Advanced Search Results

Sajjan Khaitan Proprietor Vs. Eastern India Motion Picture Association ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

P.L. Lamba (Huf) Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)90TTJ(Del)388

the appellant shall not engage directly or indirectly in marketing and selling of the ice cream products in competition with BBLIL.In terms of clause 10 of the strategic alliance agreement the appellant and other constituents of the … further noted that the legislature has, in its wisdom, amended the provisions of section 28 by the Finance Act, 2002, with effect from 1-4-2003 to insert a new clause (va). The said clause provides that any sum received

The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford, Tradi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Copyright Act - Sections 22

Reported in : 103(2003)DLT139; 2003(67)DRJ184; 2003(26)PTC186(Del)

is further alleged that plaintiff has learnt on or about 5th April 2002 that defendant No. 1 is proposing to publish series of five course … works of the plaintiff without its consent in writing for her lifetime plus 60 years as provided by Section 22 of the Copyright Act unless agreement was terminated earlier under Clauses 8 or 19. Hence, submission in regard … be released shortly in the market. It is further alleged that defendant No. 1 is a long standing competitor of the plaintiff in educational publishing, particularly school textbooks in English language course. Said volumes are on the

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

the impugned orders are perverse? Jurisdiction of CCI to entertain the complaints of Micromax and Intex under the Competition Act, 2002 84. The central challenge in these petitions is to the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints filed … the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under: … the cost of the end product were contrary to the FRAND obligations. 22. Insofar as the Ericsson's suit against Micromax was concerned, CCI held that

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … submitted that the CCI clearly passed the impugned order while exercising adjudicatory/judicial functions. It was also contended that Section 22(3) of the Act is ex facie unconstitutional. He said that the terms used, i.e. "meetings", "voting", "second" or

Chettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : MRTP

respondent and quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2016, passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.) The petitioner operates a coal handling terminal at the third respondent Port, Kamarajar Port Limited. The petitioner was … presence of the Judicial member in the meetings of the Commission. In this regard, reference was made to Section 22 of the Act, which deals with the 'Meeting of the Commission'. The learned counsel elaborately referred to the

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

India (CCI), which was envisioned to maintain adequate competition in the market and protect consumer welfare. Further, the Competition Act, 2002 was later enacted which provided certain powers of Civil Courts to the CCI for effective enquiry and adjudication.37. … First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal - with unified route for appeal.6 22. In the year 2006 the United Kingdom created a Tribunal Service, which … the High Court of Kerala. The petitioner had originally approached the High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13 (5- A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest (SARFAESI) Act,

Shri Jose C. Mundadan vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … of Director General regarding non-compliance with the said processes, the Commission through Secretary issued show cause notices on 22.09.2016 and 02.12.2016. There being no response to such notices, the Commission imposed penalty of Rs.5,00,000/- by order dated

M/S Rajasthan Cylinders & Containers Ltd vs.competition Commission ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … of Director General regarding non-compliance with the said processes, the Commission through Secretary issued show cause notices on 22.09.2016 and 02.12.2016. There being no response to such notices, the Commission imposed penalty of Rs.5,00,000/- by order dated

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1 … the Commission to the Tribunal could be useful in complete and effective adjudication of the issue before it.” 22. As could be seen, CCI which is a body corporate in terms of Section 7(2) of the Act,