Advanced Search Results

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

the impugned orders are perverse? Jurisdiction of CCI to entertain the complaints of Micromax and Intex under the Competition Act, 2002 84. The central challenge in these petitions is to the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints filed … the contention that CCI lacked the technical competence to examine issues relating to patents, Mr. Kathpalia referred to Section 21A of the Competition Act and on the strength of the provisions, argued that in cases where CCI required … the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under:

Chettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : MRTP

respondent and quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2016, passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.) The petitioner operates a coal handling terminal at the third respondent Port, Kamarajar Port Limited. The petitioner was … through its proxy/agents being abusive and extortionate charge; to make a reference to the TAMP, in terms of Section 21A of the Act; to direct the third respondent to appoint a regulator in terms of the Licence Agreement

Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Through Its Chairman - Shri Raikumar B. Guja ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 20 and 90(7); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Eighty-sixth (Amendment) Act, 2002; All India Concil for Technical Education Act; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 21, 21A, 26, 30, 41 and 226; The Secondary School Code 2002

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR1

obviously subject to such limitations as are provided in law or in accordance with law.22. By Eighty-sixth Amendment Act, 2002, Article 21A was introduced which provided for free and compulsory education to all children in the age group … Standards unauthorisedly and had started the 5th standard in their respective schools. This has resulted in an unhealthy competition and these schools are trying to attract students on the basis of caste and creed throwing all caution … some of the petitioners submitted that the power of the Board under Section 90(7) of the Act is to levy fees simpliciter. He cited the

Shishti Solkar and ors Vs. Mahavir Sr.Model School and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

and compulsory education to all children upto the age of 14 years. Later on, through the 86th Constitutional Act, 2002, Article 21A was inserted with a view to achieve the said objective of providing free and compulsory education … children are not deprived, as education has become the necessity for survival in this day of cut throat competition. Education is a right not a luxury in our country and the statutes are to abridge the gap … The petitioner no.2 has claimed that he belongs to the economically weaker section of the society and also belongs to the scheduled castes category and

Tilok Singh and ors Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Education

of fact, it is fraud on the Constitution inasmuch as Article 21A inserted vide Constitution (Eighty Sixth Amendment) Act, 2002 casts duty upon the State to provide free and compulsory education to all children of age 6 to … of Tamil Nadhu and Another' reported in 2000(7) SCC618 Learned counsel submitted that while engaging Vidhyarthi Mitra the competitive claims are not considered and the authorities concerned are making appointments by adopting 'pick and choose' method. Learned … posts in the cadre is prohibited by virtue of provisions of sub- section (2) of Section 4 of the Rajasthan (Regulation of Appointments to Public

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the second appellant, Western Coalfields Limited, a subsidiary company of the first appellant cannot be bound by the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). In other words, having regard to the very object and purpose for … Government Agencies, as indicated therein. There is no such provision in the Act. He drew our attention to Section 21A of the MRTP Act. Drawing inspiration from the preamble to the Act, he emphasizes that the center stage

Balu Dada Gabhale Vs. Zilla Parishad, Through the Chief Executive Offi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India (Eighty sixth Amendment) Act, 2002 - Schedule - Article 14

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR673

in the field of Social Welfare Legislation when it introduced Article 21A by the Constitution (Eighty sixth Amendment) Act, 2002. The object was so laudable and depicted the State'sintention to provide free education to children between the age … Corporation.3. Thirty One (31) Zilla Parishads except Pune and Solapur Zilla Parishads should decide stitching agency after inviting competitive bids at Zilla Parishad level. As per above decision, detailed orders are being given as ahead.PURCHASE OF CLOTH … to fourteen years, thus guaranteeing the primary education, particularly to the poor section of the society, whose children were not able to receive education for

Randall Vs. Sorrell

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

(concluding that Canada, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Malta-all of which have campaign expenditure limits-have more electoral competition than the United States, Jamaica, Ireland, and Australia-all of which lack such limits). Footnote 5 See Art. I, … municipal candidates. Homans v. Albuquerque, 217 F. Supp. 2d 1197, 1200 (NM 2002), aff’d, 366 F. 3d 900 (CA10), cert. denied, 543 U. S.1002 (2004). … ($500 per election); Me. Rev. Stat. Ann., Tit. 21A, §1015(1) (1993) ($500 for governor, $250 for other … states court of appeals for the second circuit No. 04-1528. Argued February 28, 2006-Decided June 26, 2006 Vermont’s Act 64 stringently limits both the amounts that candidates for state office may spend on their campaigns and the … connection between expenditure limits and a reduction in fundraising time. In a section of the opinion dealing with FECA’s public financing provisions, it wrote that

The State of Bihar Vs. The Bihar Secondary Teachers Struggle Committee ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Bihar and Ors. vs. The Bihar Secondary Teachers Struggle Committee, Munger & Ors.8. By the Constitution (86th Amendment Act, 2002) which came into effect on 01.04.2010, Article 21A dealing with right to education was inserted in the Constitution. … 2018 etc. 17 State of Bihar and Ors. vs. The Bihar Secondary Teachers Struggle Committee, Munger & Ors. competition of 3 years. Under Rule 10, the posts of Municipal Secondary and Higher Secondary Teachers were normally not … non-Government Secondary Schools were taken over by the State. In terms of Section 3, all non-Government Secondary Schools other than Minority Secondary Schools based on

Association of Registration Plates Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionMotor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(21A), 39 to 65, 109, 109(1), 109(2), 109(3) and 212(4); Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rules 50, 50(1) and 51; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 19(1); Motor Vehicles (New High Security Registration Plates) Order, 2001 - Rule 50

Reported in : AIR2005SC469; 2005(1)CTC111; 2005(1)CTLJ14(SC); JT2004(10)SC147; 2004(10)SCALE60; (2005)1SCC679

variation in quality of the material and in terms of workmanship.9. Possible duplication of Registration Plates due to competition between manufacturer of different regions and lack of aggregated security controlled database management systems.10. Non-conformity of data of … various State Governments on the guidelines circulated by the Central Government for implementing the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and the newly amended Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 (hereinafter referred … of this rule, the registration mark referred to in Sub-section (6) of Section 41 shall be displayed both at the front and at the rear