Advanced Search Results

M/S. Vikash Trading Company, Represented by Its Proprietor, C.S. Bohar ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

appeairng on behalf of the petitioner, in W.P.No.25669 of 2012, had submitted that, as per the provisions of Section 21 of the Competition Act, 2002, the Designated Authority should refer the matter pending before the said authority to … cannot render the Final Findings, without referring the matter to the Competition Commission, under the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, cannot be held to be valid in the eye of law. The issuance of the Disclosure Statement, by

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

any W.P.(C) 3044/2016 Page 7 of 27 information, and as an illustration, reference to Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002 was made. The learned Senior Counsel also referred to Section 21(2) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, which

Uttarakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing Board and Ors. Vs.competiti ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) LPA6742017 Page 1 of 8 made under Section 26(1) of The Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟) expressing prima facie opinion that the Board had restricted production by Indian

Reliance Infrastructure Limited, Mumbai Vs. the Maharahtra Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : MRTP

market and dominant position in the relevant market, in accordance with the requirements of Section 21 of the Competition Act, 2002. The issues and the decisions proposed by the Commission in the Reference dated February 1, 2011 before the

P.G. Narayanan Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by the Secretary, Mi ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Competition Act, 2002 - Sections 3; West Bengal Animal Slaughter Control Act, 1950; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 38, 39C, 142 and 226

Reported in : 2005(3)CTC582; (2005)3MLJ210; [2005]62SCL586(Mad)

bias and since there is imminent danger of the application being considered favourably violating the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, the petitioner is entitled to maintain a quia timet action. Learned counsel further submitted that though specific allegations … will have to be read into the Universal Declaration as also Article 21 of the Constitution. Similarly, in (1995) 1 S.C.C. 189 [STATE OF WEST … has been relaxed by the courts to vindicate a legal injury or a legal wrong caused to a section of the people by grave violation of any statutory and constitutional provisions. At the same time, the Supreme

Chettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : MRTP

respondent and quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2016, passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.) The petitioner operates a coal handling terminal at the third respondent Port, Kamarajar Port Limited. The petitioner was … its proxy/agents being abusive and extortionate charge; to make a reference to the TAMP, in terms of Section 21A of the Act; to direct the third respondent to appoint a regulator in terms of the Licence Agreement

Dlf Ltd Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

and Anr., (2010) 10 SCC.744. He submits that in this case, while dealing with the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, the Supreme Court has clearly drawn a distinction between the administrative/inquisitorial functions of the commission, and its adjudicatory … and cheated him of Rs. 31,09,50,000/- towards sale proceeds of certain lands. A First Information Report (FIR) under Section 420 IPC was got registered at the instance of respondent no.2 against Sudipti and a few others on … taken up for hearing by the Court simultaneously and disposed of on 21.07.2011. The observations made by the Court and the directions issued by it

Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association Vs. Nbcc (i ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … as applicable to the case at hand, particularly Section 18 relating to the duties of interim resolution professional; Section 21 specifying the composition of the Committee of Creditors and matters related with it; Section 24 laying down the

Dena Bank (now Bank Of Baroda) Vs. C. Shivakumar Reddy

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … occurred. Provided that for the financial creditors, referred to in clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (6-A) of Section 21, an application for initiating corporate insolvency resolution process against the corporate debtor shall be filed jointly by not

Vijay Kumar Jain Vs. Standard Chartered Bank

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition 18 Commission of India under … Ernst and Young was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional in both petitions. The CoC was constituted under Section 21 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [“Insolvency Code” or “Code”]., and the appellant being a member of