Advanced Search Results

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

the impugned orders are perverse? Jurisdiction of CCI to entertain the complaints of Micromax and Intex under the Competition Act, 2002 84. The central challenge in these petitions is to the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints filed … the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under: … a patentee insofar as grant of patent license is concerned, is not an 'enterprise' within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the Act. (b) That the patentee insofar as licensing of patent is concerned, is not engaged in

Chettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : MRTP

respondent and quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2016, passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.) The petitioner operates a coal handling terminal at the third respondent Port, Kamarajar Port Limited. The petitioner was … (Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in case

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1

M/S Transparent Energy Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Tecpro Systems Ltd.

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Sanjeev Pandey Vs. Mahendra and Mahendra and Others

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

K. Madhusudhan Rao Vs. M/S Lodha Healthy Constructions and Developers ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Vikrant Bhagi Vs. M/S Media Video Limited and Another

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

N. Sanjeev Rao and Mrs. Fatima Tahir Vs. Andhra Pradesh Hire Purchase ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Steel Authority of India Limited Vs. Competition Commission of India a ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Competition

Acts : Competition Act, 2002 - Section 19 read with Section 26(1)

Limited („JSPL), Respondent No. 3, invoked the provisions of Section 19 read with Section 26 (1) of the Competition Act, 2002 („CA') by providing information to the CCI alleging that the Petitioner SAIL had inter alia entered into an … Shaqib, Ms. Pallavi Shroff and Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, learned counsel accept notice on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties this petition has been heard