Advanced Search Results

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

the impugned orders are perverse? Jurisdiction of CCI to entertain the complaints of Micromax and Intex under the Competition Act, 2002 84. The central challenge in these petitions is to the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints filed … 16 of the Competition Act provides for appointment of Director General for the purposes of assisting CCI and Section 17 of the Act provides for appointment of Secretary, experts, professionals and officers and other employees of CCI. 118. … the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under:

Uttarakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing Board and Ors. Vs.competiti ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) LPA6742017 Page 1 of 8 made under Section 26(1) of The Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟) expressing prima facie opinion that the Board had restricted production by Indian … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 17, 2017 + LPA6742017 UTTARAKHAND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING BOARD & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Avtar Singh Rawat, Senior

M/S. Vikash Trading Company, Represented by Its Proprietor, C.S. Bohar ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

cannot render the Final Findings, without referring the matter to the Competition Commission, under the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, cannot be held to be valid in the eye of law. The issuance of the Disclosure Statement, by … levied at the stage prior to the Final Findings rendered, under Rule 17 of the Anti-Dumping Rules, 1995, and, as such the assessment and payment … Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, read with Section 9A and 9B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and to quash the same in respect of goods

M/S Oracle Drugs and Others Vs. Secretary, Department of Health and Fa ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Indiabulls Financial Services Limited and anr. Vs. ------------------- ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

the Petitioner Companies may be asked to give an undertaking for necessary compliance of the Provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 with regard to the proposed Scheme.13. The Petitioner Companies in response to the Representation Affidavit dated 21 November … 03 March 2011 in Company Petition No.448 of 2010 and judgment dated 17 October 2011 in Company Petition No.318 of 2011. It is accordingly submitted … CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This second motion Petition has been filed under Section 391(2) and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) by the Petitioner Companies seeking sanction and approval of

Namrata Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

General, Competition Commission of India, New Delhi under Section 41 (2) read with Section 36 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the œCompetition Act?), and further a direction has been sought for upon the Competition Commission of … in Supreme Court. A copy of the reply submitted by the petitioner is annexure-P10 to the writ petition. 17. The respondent-Commission issued another notice on 09th April, 2013 seeking complete information upto 20th April, 2013. The petitioner

Union of India Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

entertain the complaint on the basis of the information of respondent No. 2 under Section 19(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act). The Commission has rejected the stand of the petitioner that it is not an ‘enterprise’ within … observations of the Supreme Court apply with equal force in relation to the provisions of the Competition Act. 17. Before I consider the submissions of the learned ASG in relation to the meaning of the expression ‘enterprise’

Competition Commission of India Vs. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

(in short, “the Tribunal”) setting aside the order passed by the Competition Commission under section 43A of the Competition Act, 2002 (in short, referred to as “the Act”) whereby penalty of Rupees One Crore 2 was imposed on the … enterprise subject to certain threshold requirement that is minimum asset valuation or turn over within or outside India. 17. Under Section 5(b) of the Act the combination is formed if the acquisition of control by a person

Ms Anuradha Sharma & Anr. vs Jiva Ayurvedic Pharmacy Limited & ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

Appellants have been restrained from engaging in any act that may amount to infringement, passing off, or unfair competition in relation to the Plaintiff9s trademarks.3. For the sake of convenience and consistency, the parties hereinwill be referred … such exclusive rights granted in the Plaintiffs9 trademark registration. In support of this argument, reliance was placed on Section 17 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, which grants exclusive rights to the registered proprietor of a mark, to

Ultra Tech Cement Limited Vs. the Secretary to Government, Commercial ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 - Sections 31, 32, 33 and 33(1); Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 17(4); Central Sales Tax Act; Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 84 and 85; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 - Rule 48A; Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007 - Rule 16(4)

Reported in : (2008)16VST481(Mad)

by order in O. P. No. 669 of 2001, dated January 4, 2002 in the case of V.V.K. Packaging Private Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner (CT), … of manufactured port land cement. The non-collection of tax by the unit is in order to maintain the competitive advantage and this provision is incorporated in Rule 48A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959. … dated May 14, 1990 and the relevant notifications G.O. P. No. 396/dated September 10, 1991 is governed under Section 17(4) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. As per Rule 48A of the TNGST Rules, 1959,