Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: competition act 2002 section 16 · Page 1 of about 2,302 results (0.070 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 30 2016

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2016

Subject : MRTP

the impugned orders are perverse? Jurisdiction of CCI to entertain the complaints of Micromax and Intex under the Competition Act, 2002 84. The central challenge in these petitions is to the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints filed … Section 7 of the Competition Act provides for establishment of CCI and Section 8 provides for its composition. Section 16 of the Competition Act provides for appointment of Director General for the purposes of assisting CCI and Section … the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under:

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2012

M/S. Vikash Trading Company, Represented by Its Proprietor, C.S. Bohar ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-30-2012

Subject : Education

cannot render the Final Findings, without referring the matter to the Competition Commission, under the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, cannot be held to be valid in the eye of law. The issuance of the Disclosure Statement, by … the law and issue a fresh disclosure statement in term of Rule 16 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on … Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, read with Section 9A and 9B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and to quash the same in respect of goods

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2013

Namrata Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-04-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

General, Competition Commission of India, New Delhi under Section 41 (2) read with Section 36 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the œCompetition Act?), and further a direction has been sought for upon the Competition Commission of … 4 of the Competition Act. Pertinently, the Director General is appointed by the Central Government in terms of Section 16 of the Competition Act to assist the Commission in conducting inquiry into contravention of the provisions of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 09 2010

Competition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-09-2010

Subject : MRTP

made recommendations and submitted its report on 22nd of May, 2002. After completion of the consultation process, the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the `Act') as Act 12 of 2003, dated 12th December, 2003, was enacted. As per the … functions, including passing of interim orders and even awarding compensation and imposing penalty. The Director General appointed under Section 16(1) of the Act is a specialized investigating wing of the Commission. In short, the establishment of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2019

Competition Commission of India vs.m/s. Grasim Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-12-2019

Subject : MRTP

of the CCI, stating that GIL had abused its dominant position, in terms of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 („Act‟). 1.3 The learned Single Judge has, in the impugned judgment, held that inasmuch as the direction issued … CCI would not take up the matter for hearing till the following date. LPA1372014 Page 9 of 38 16. Ultimately, orders were reserved on 6th December, 2013 and the impugned judgment was passed by the learned Single

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 2013

M/S Oracle Drugs and Others Vs. Secretary, Department of Health and Fa ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Decided on : Jul-01-2013

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2015

Union of India Through Executive Engineer, Mumbai Central Division No. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-20-2015

Subject : Arbitration

provided otherwise was a clear abuse of dominant position. The respondent placed reliance on Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 in support of this contention. In the said letter, the respondent alleged that the respondent had always shown … respondent replied to the said show cause notice vide letter dated 27th October 2010. By a letter dated 16th November 2010, the petitioner issued a letter thereby determining the contract and informing the respondent that the earnest

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2016

Chettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-29-2016

Subject : MRTP

respondent and quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2016, passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.) The petitioner operates a coal handling terminal at the third respondent Port, Kamarajar Port Limited. The petitioner was … Ltd and Anr., vs. Competition Commission of India and Ors., reported in(2010) 4 Company Law Journal 557 (Bombay). 16. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and perused the materials placed on record. 17. When this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2019

Shri Jose C. Mundadan vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … on 13.09.2013, there being no response or compliance.5. The Director General made a report to the Commission on 16.01.2014 seeking imposition of penalty under Section 43 of the Competition Act. In the wake of decision of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2019

M/S Rajasthan Cylinders & Containers Ltd vs.competition Commission ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … on 13.09.2013, there being no response or compliance.5. The Director General made a report to the Commission on 16.01.2014 seeking imposition of penalty under Section 43 of the Competition Act. In the wake of decision of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial