Advanced Search Results
Union of India Through Executive Engineer, Mumbai Central Division No. ...
Mumbai
Apr-20-2015
Arbitration
dominant position and thus question of applicability of provisions of the said Competition Act, 2002 did not arise. 15. Learned counsel also invited my attention to the findings of the learned arbitrator that Income Tax Department had … provided otherwise was a clear abuse of dominant position. The respondent placed reliance on Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 in support of this contention. In the said letter, the respondent alleged that the respondent had always shown
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Oracle Drugs and Others Vs. Secretary, Department of Health and Fa ...
Competition Commission of India CCI
Jul-01-2013
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Jose C. Mundadan vs.state & Anr.
Delhi
Mar-29-2019
Land Acquisition
a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … ―and‖. As we have noted earlier in Vimla AIR1963SC1572it was held that the term Crl.M.C. 4363/2018 etc. Page 15 of 24 ―fraudulently‖ is wider than the term ―dishonestly‖ which however, requires a wrongful gain and a wrongful
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S Rajasthan Cylinders & Containers Ltd vs.competition Commission ...
Delhi
Mar-29-2019
Land Acquisition
a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … ―and‖. As we have noted earlier in Vimla AIR1963SC1572it was held that the term Crl.M.C. 4363/2018 etc. Page 15 of 24 ―fraudulently‖ is wider than the term ―dishonestly‖ which however, requires a wrongful gain and a wrongful
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJose C Mundadan vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Delhi
Mar-29-2019
Land Acquisition
a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … ―and‖. As we have noted earlier in Vimla AIR1963SC1572it was held that the term Crl.M.C. 4363/2018 etc. Page 15 of 24 ―fraudulently‖ is wider than the term ―dishonestly‖ which however, requires a wrongful gain and a wrongful
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and O ...
Competition Appellate Tribunal
May-19-2014
Land Acquisition
the above-said clauses were described as ex-facie unfair and discriminatory attracting the provisions of section 4(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter "Act"). It was urged that this amounted to abuse of dominant position by the Appellant. A complaint … Representation "F", the Appellant, could unilaterally reduce the earmarked land of 6.67 acres for the multi storied apartments. 15. It was also submitted that the Clauses "J" and "K" were inserted to the effect that the apartment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCompetition Commission of India vs.m/s. Grasim Industries Ltd.
Delhi
Sep-12-2019
MRTP
of the CCI, stating that GIL had abused its dominant position, in terms of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 („Act‟). 1.3 The learned Single Judge has, in the impugned judgment, held that inasmuch as the direction issued … and evidence filed by GIL with its objections to the report of the DG. Single Judge’s impugned judgment 15. W.P.(C) No.4159/2013 challenging the aforementioned order of the CCI was then filed by GIL in this Court. When
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNamrata Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India and Ot ...
Allahabad
Dec-04-2013
Land Acquisition
General, Competition Commission of India, New Delhi under Section 41 (2) read with Section 36 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the œCompetition Act?), and further a direction has been sought for upon the Competition Commission of … writ petitions and held that Sections 3-C and 3-D were beyond the legislative competence of the State Legislature. 15. Feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid judgement and order of the Division Bench, the respondent no. 5, namely, Sri
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...
Delhi
Mar-30-2016
MRTP
the impugned orders are perverse? Jurisdiction of CCI to entertain the complaints of Micromax and Intex under the Competition Act, 2002 84. The central challenge in these petitions is to the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints filed … the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under: … other senior executives from Ericsson global". Ericsson had also placed letter dated 15th June, 2015 addressed to the Additional Director General, CCI which indicates that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSajjan Khaitan Proprietor Vs. Eastern India Motion Picture Association ...
Competition Commission of India CCI
Aug-09-2012
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »