Advanced Search Results

M/S. Vikash Trading Company, Represented by Its Proprietor, C.S. Bohar ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

cannot render the Final Findings, without referring the matter to the Competition Commission, under the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, cannot be held to be valid in the eye of law. The issuance of the Disclosure Statement, by … respondent from proceeding further with the investigation, based on the said statement. 13. The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3, … Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, read with Section 9A and 9B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and to quash the same in respect of goods

M/S Oracle Drugs and Others Vs. Secretary, Department of Health and Fa ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … for the chairperson is 65 years and the members is 62 years.109. The functions of AERA include, under Section 13, determination of tariff for the aeronautical services, in all major airports, taking into consideration several factors, i.e. the

Sajjan Khaitan Proprietor Vs. Eastern India Motion Picture Association ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

any W.P.(C) 3044/2016 Page 7 of 27 information, and as an illustration, reference to Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002 was made. The learned Senior Counsel also referred to Section 21(2) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, which … alleged bribery of officials in India by WIPL.6. WIPL responded to the said summons by a letter dated 13.11.2015, inter alia, stating that the newspaper reports referred to in the summons did not ―provide any details as

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

the impugned orders are perverse? Jurisdiction of CCI to entertain the complaints of Micromax and Intex under the Competition Act, 2002 84. The central challenge in these petitions is to the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints filed … the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under: … our notice the meanings of the term "property" set out in Chapter 13, "The Law of Property", in Salmond's Jurisprudence (12th Edition, 1966). In this

All India Tyre Dealers’ Federation Vs. Tyre Manufacturers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited Vs. u.o.i and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

indulged in cartilisation, thereby influencing and rigging the prices, thus, violating the provisions of Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the ‘Act’). The CCI, as a result, imposed severe penalties in the form of fines under … group companies controlled by single management.13) The CCI in its detailed order began with considering the scope of 13 constructed bid rigging agreement and cartel. In that the CCI also considered the 18 famous observations by Lord

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

in proceedings initiated suo moto by it since it is a dominus litus in such proceedings;49 47 The Competition Act 2002; Section 53S; Also see the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009; Regulation 51 48 (2010) 10 SCC744[104]. 49 … date of commencement of the Act. By a notification dated 12 May 2009, the Central Government established AERA. Section 13 of the AERA Act prescribes the functions of AERA. AERA must perform the following functions in respect of

M/S. Muthoot Finance Limited, vs Competition Commission of India,

Court : Kerala

the extent to which it finds that there is a prima facie violation of Section 45 of the Competition Act, 2002.2. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of the writ petition are as follows: Petitioner is apublicly listed company … the issuance of Ext.P10 show cause notice against the petitioner by the 1st respondent was W.P.(C).No.15627 of 2022 13 its submission of Ext.P8 letter to the 2nd respondent bringing to its attention the potential cartelization by debenture