Advanced Search Results

All India Tyre Dealers’ Federation Vs. Tyre Manufacturers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Ramakant Kini Vs. Hiranandani Hospital

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

East Line Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute and o ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ConstitutionContract

Acts : Competition Act, 2003 - Sections 1 and 54; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 299

amount to abuse of dominant position which will be violative of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The dominant position has been defined under the Competition Act, 2002 as a position of strength enjoyed by … that effect in the minutes of the meeting. This is admitted by the petitioner in Annexure 'C dated 12-3-2004. The petitioner; however, now claims that he gave his signature without free consent and it was extraneous consideration

Colgate-palmolive (India) Limited Vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Media and CommunicationCivil

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1987; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 36A, 36(1) and 55; Lanham Act; Federal Trade Commission Act - Sections 5(1), 12, 15 and 15(1); Broadcasting Act, 1981; Cable Broadcasting Act, 1984; European Communities Act; Young Persons (Harmful Publications) Act, 1956; Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use)Act, 1950; Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986; Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994; Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Prize Competition Act, 1955; Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978; Cigarettes and other Tobacco Product

Reported in : (2008)7MLJ1119; 2009(40)PTC653(Mad)

unfair trade practice.55. However, The MRTP Act, 1969 is sought to be repealed by Section 66 of The Competition Act, 2002 ( Section 66 does not appear to have been notified so far). But fortunately, the power to enquire … European Convention on Human Rights protecting freedom of expression includes the protection of information of a commercial nature. Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, 1998, also laid emphasis on the right to freedom of expression.64. Thus, on

Prabhat Agri Biotech Ltd. And Anr. Vs.registrar of Plant Varieties and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

it affects its business. The only enactment which uses the term “abusive” is Section 4 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002, which employs it while defining what constitutes “abuse of dominant position” by a business or corporate entity, taking … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 04.2016 Pronounced on:02. 12.2016 + W.P.(C) 250/2009 PRABHAT AGRI BIOTECH LTD. AND ANR. ……Petitioners REGISTRAR OF PLANT VARIETIES AND ORS.…..Respondents Versus +

Rci Power Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 11, 11(1), 12, 12(3), 15(4), 26, 26(5), 54(2), 56(2) and 56(3); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 22, 22(1) and 29; Transfer Scheme Rules

Reported in : AIR2004AP60; 2003(3)ALD762

of Reform and Restructure is to create conditions for the sustainable development of its Power Sector through promoting competition, efficiency, transparency and attracting the much needed private finances into the Power Sector. The ultimate goal of the … Swamy, J. 1. Petitioners in Writ Petition Nos. 4770 and 4771 of 2002 are the appellants in CMA Nos. 1351 and 1356 of 2001. These … while determining the tariff or charges for wheeling, since the same is reimbursable by the State Government under Section 12(3) of the Reforms Act.176. A reading of the impugned order shows how the Commission went out of the

Sajjan Khaitan Proprietor Vs. Eastern India Motion Picture Association ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Chettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : MRTP

respondent and quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2016, passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.) The petitioner operates a coal handling terminal at the third respondent Port, Kamarajar Port Limited. The petitioner was … for which purpose, this Court may remand the matter to the Commission to reconsider on the above contentions. 12. Mr.G.Rajagopalan, learned Additional Solicitor General of India appearing for the Commission submitted that at this stage of the

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1 … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA7152014 Pronounced on:02. 12.2014 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA ... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar, Mr. Abhimanyu Chopra,

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1 … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA7152014 Pronounced on:02. 12.2014 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA ... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar, Mr. Abhimanyu Chopra,