Advanced Search Results

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electricity Act, 2003; Section 27 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997; Section 61 of the Competition Act, 2002. 24Section 9 of the Civil Procedure Code 12 legislature wishes those disputes arising from such new legislation not … was of the firm opinion that the tribunals should be a real substitute to High Courts. While scrutinizing Chapter II of the Act which dealt with the establishment of tribunals, this Court expressed its view that a

Forum For Peoples Collective Efforts (fpce) Vs. The State Of West Beng ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the has effect of monopoly situation, suo-motu reference to the Regulatory the authority has power to make Competition Commission of Authority suo-motu reference to the India. Competition Commission of India in certain cases. It may also … issued under which the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (“SARFAESI Act”) were applied to certain non-banking financial institutions, including the respondent. The respondent issued a notice under … Union law throughout the country, Parliament enacted the Amendment Act by inserting Chapter IVA in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. This object, the Court ruled, … with or 62 - Penalty for non-registration contravenes the provisions of section 9 or section non-registration and contravention 10, he shall be liable to a

In Re: Alleged Cartelization by Steel Producers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986); (iii) Which are within the purview of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003); (iv) relating to an order of eviction which is appealable under section 28K of the … Authority of India Act, 1997 (24 of 1997) shall, on and from the commencement of Part XIV of Chapter VI of the Finance Act, 2017 (7 of 2017), be the Appellate Tribunal for the purposes of this

M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd. versus the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.1525

The Central Goods And Services Tax Act, 2017; The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; The Customs Act, 1962; Competition Act, 2002; The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; The Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006; The Bureau of Indian … enhance their efficiency and since these articles are components/accessories of BTS/antenna which are admittedly “capital goods” falling under Chapter 85 within sub-clause (i) of Rule 2(a)(A) of CENVAT Rules, these items consequently are covered by the definition … Commr. of Customs v. Rupa and Co. Ltd. [2004] Supp. 3 SCR 99 : (2004) 6 SCC 408; Commr. of C.Ex., Jaipur v. Rajasthan Spinning

Cellular Operators Association of India and Ors. Vs. Telecom Regulator ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Counsel have also argued, based on Section 402 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 27(d) of the Competition Act, 2002, that no power is given by the TRAI Act for interference with licence conditions, which amount to a … the network of the service provider;”; (bc) “calling consumer” means a consumer who initiates a voice call;”; After Chapter IV of the principal regulations, the following chapter shall be inserted, namely :- |“CHAPTER V” | | | … ensure that coverage of a district headquarters/town would mean that at least 90% of the area bounded by municipal limits should get the required street

Sgivs Global LLC vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

is wholly misconceived. The concept of predatory pricing is argued to be covered under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. Inorder to invoke Section 4, the essential ingredient is argued to be theexistence of a dominant position in … 2, has made the following submissions:14.1 Learned Counsel has made a reference to Clause B (II) (e) of Chapter XV of the RFP titled Selection of Bidders/Award of Contract read with Annexure K titled Financial Bid, to … (surplus) 15,25,036) Surplus / (Deficit) deficit per month Total 3-Year Revenue AED 9,98,29,600 AED 3,64,76,200 Total 3-Year Operating AED 9,13,77,512 AED Cost (incl. VAT) 9,13,77,512

Union of India Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

entertain the complaint on the basis of the information of respondent No. 2 under Section 19(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act). The Commission has rejected the stand of the petitioner that it is not an ‘enterprise’ within … the Act. If it is an ‘enterprise’ under Section 2(h) of the Act, the Commission gets jurisdiction under Chapter IV of the Act. 20. The Commission has taken note of Section 54 of the Act, which provides … railway transport is being undertaken by the petitioner as a sovereign function. 9. Mr. Parasaran also refers to Clause 3.2 of the Concession Agreement dated

Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association Vs. Nbcc (i ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … at the meetings of the committee of creditors; (j) file application for avoidance of transactions in accordance with Chapter III, if any; and (k) such other actions as may be specified by the Board. 47Section 25A. Rights … the homebuyers was that only 8% of them were seeking refund whereas 92% had asked for possession of the flats and, in order to avoid

Vijay Kumar Jain Vs. Standard Chartered Bank

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition 18 Commission of India under … at the meetings of the committee of creditors; (j) file application for avoidance of transactions in accordance with Chapter III, if any; and (k) such other actions as may be specified by the Board.” (emphasis supplied) “29. … resolution plan of one Adani Wilmar Limited was approved by majority of 96.86% of the committee of creditors. On 24.08.2018, the resolution professional submitted its