Advanced Search Results

Thiru. R. Gandhi President, Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 50, 226 and 323; Companies Act 1956 - 10FB, 10FD(2), 10FD (3), 10FD(3), 10FE, 10FF, 10FK(2), 10FO, 10FR(3), 10FX, 79(1), 79(3), 117B, 118(3), 144(4), 163(6), 167, 188(5), 196(4), 219 (4), 225(3), 284(4), 304 (2)(b), 307 (9) and 621A; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : [2004]120CompCas510(Mad); (2004)2CompLJ274(Mad); 2004(2)CTC561; [2004]52SCL79(Mad)

Tribunal in the manner now provided, when considered along with the provisions concerning the Competition Commission under the Competition Act 2002, seems to indicate a pattern of an aggressive executive seeking to take over gradually the judicial power traditionally … manner and entitled to the same security of tenure as the holder of the judicial office named in Chapter 7 of the Constitution which entitled him to exercise the jurisdiction at the time when the Constitution came into

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … but not under Section 3 of the Act. Hearing on penalty is extended to all other cases under Chapter VI of the Act including for non-cooperation and gun-jumping, but not for penalties in respect of contraventions under … ORS + W.P.(C) 6610/2014 + W.P.(C) 6634/2014, CM APPL. 20409/2014 + W.P.(C) 7087/2014, CM APPL. 16614/2014, CM APPL. 39827/2018 + W.P.(C) 7121/2014, CM APPL. 16680/2014,

In Re: Alleged Cartelization by Steel Producers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986); (iii) Which are within the purview of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003); (iv) relating to an order of eviction which is appealable under section 28K of the … Authority of India Act, 1997 (24 of 1997) shall, on and from the commencement of Part XIV of Chapter VI of the Finance Act, 2017 (7 of 2017), be the Appellate Tribunal for the purposes of this

Cellular Operators Association of India and Ors. Vs. Telecom Regulator ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Counsel have also argued, based on Section 402 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 27(d) of the Competition Act, 2002, that no power is given by the TRAI Act for interference with licence conditions, which amount to a … the network of the service provider;”; (bc) “calling consumer” means a consumer who initiates a voice call;”; After Chapter IV of the principal regulations, the following chapter shall be inserted, namely :- |“CHAPTER V” | | | … - excess charging and inconvenience caused to them. In paragraphs 6 and 7, the arguments of service providers have been noted, in which service providers

Premlata Gupta Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : ConstitutionCommercial

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 89; Bihar Excise Rules - Rules 44, 45 and 46; Constitution of India - Article 14

of only one person, then that would speak bad against the administration and would show that the fair competition even in the excise matters is not allowed to be raised. It is also contended that in other … necessary to see the contents of Section 30 to Section 36 of Chapter VI of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915. From a perusal … be contended that the Collector was getting himself in touch with everything and was trying to take immediate action. The petitioner says that under some wrong advice he had filed the civil suit but the same was … settled and sent a proposal to the Collector, Begusarai for the year 2002-2003. The Collector. Begusarai approved the aforesaid list prepared by the Excise Superintendent … certificate of solvency to the extent of Rs. 75 lacs and has filed the income tax return

M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd. versus the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.1525

The Central Goods And Services Tax Act, 2017; The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; The Customs Act, 1962; Competition Act, 2002; The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; The Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006; The Bureau of Indian … enhance their efficiency and since these articles are components/accessories of BTS/antenna which are admittedly “capital goods” falling under Chapter 85 within sub-clause (i) of Rule 2(a)(A) of CENVAT Rules, these items consequently are covered by the definition … Ltd. Vs. CCE [2004] Supp. 2 SCR 659 : (2004) 4 SCC 751 - distinguished. Triveni Engineering & Industries Ltd. & Anr v. Commissioner of

Sgivs Global LLC vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

is wholly misconceived. The concept of predatory pricing is argued to be covered under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. Inorder to invoke Section 4, the essential ingredient is argued to be theexistence of a dominant position in … 2, has made the following submissions:14.1 Learned Counsel has made a reference to Clause B (II) (e) of Chapter XV of the RFP titled Selection of Bidders/Award of Contract read with Annexure K titled Financial Bid, to … 5286/2026 Page 5 of 18quoted by the Petitioner, AED 68 and AED 79, quoted by other two bidders. It is the case of the Petitioner