Advanced Search Results
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-18-2024
MRTP
9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986); (iii) Which are within the purview of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003); (iv) relating to an order of eviction which is appealable under section 28K of the … Authority of India Act, 1997 (24 of 1997) shall, on and from the commencement of Part XIV of Chapter VI of the Finance Act, 2017 (7 of 2017), be the Appellate Tribunal for the purposes of this … be necessary to carry out the provisions of the Act [Section 13(1)(f)].. 6 AERA Act; Section 1(3)(b) 7 AERA Act; Section 1(3)(c) 8 AERA Act;
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jul-14-2021
Land Acquisition
Electricity Act, 2003; Section 27 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997; Section 61 of the Competition Act, 2002. 24Section 9 of the Civil Procedure Code 12 legislature wishes those disputes arising from such new legislation not … was of the firm opinion that the tribunals should be a real substitute to High Courts. While scrutinizing Chapter II of the Act which dealt with the establishment of tribunals, this Court expressed its view that a … Courts under Article 226.” 1 (2010) 11 SCC12 (2014) 10 SCC13 (2020) 6 SCC14 (2020) SCC Online SC9622 | Pa ge 3. The vires of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Jose C. Mundadan vs.state & Anr.
Delhi
Mar-29-2019
Land Acquisition
a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … in the other case (No.62/2012) before Competition Appellate Crl.M.C. 4363/2018 etc. Page 6 of 24 Tribunal (“the appellate tribunal”, for short), the said appeal having … the Commission.18. The duties, powers and functions of the Commission are spelt out by the legislation (in the Chapter IV), the same including the authority to issue orders of certain nature viz., orders by Commission after inquiry
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jose C Mundadan vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Delhi
Mar-29-2019
Land Acquisition
a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … in the other case (No.62/2012) before Competition Appellate Crl.M.C. 4363/2018 etc. Page 6 of 24 Tribunal (“the appellate tribunal”, for short), the said appeal having … the Commission.18. The duties, powers and functions of the Commission are spelt out by the legislation (in the Chapter IV), the same including the authority to issue orders of certain nature viz., orders by Commission after inquiry
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Rajasthan Cylinders & Containers Ltd vs.competition Commission ...
Delhi
Mar-29-2019
Land Acquisition
a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … in the other case (No.62/2012) before Competition Appellate Crl.M.C. 4363/2018 etc. Page 6 of 24 Tribunal (“the appellate tribunal”, for short), the said appeal having … the Commission.18. The duties, powers and functions of the Commission are spelt out by the legislation (in the Chapter IV), the same including the authority to issue orders of certain nature viz., orders by Commission after inquiry
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others
Delhi
Feb-23-2012
MRTP
entertain the complaint on the basis of the information of respondent No. 2 under Section 19(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act). The Commission has rejected the stand of the petitioner that it is not an ‘enterprise’ within … the Act. If it is an ‘enterprise’ under Section 2(h) of the Act, the Commission gets jurisdiction under Chapter IV of the Act. 20. The Commission has taken note of Section 54 of the Act, which provides … 03.05.2011 passed by the Competition Commission of India (Commission) in Case No. 64/2010, whereby the said Commission has rejected the petitioner’s challenge to jurisdiction of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDena Bank (now Bank Of Baroda) Vs. C. Shivakumar Reddy
Supreme Court of India
Aug-04-2021
Land Acquisition
that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … initiate corporate insolvency resolution process in respect of such corporate debtor in the manner as provided under this Chapter. 267. Initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process by financial creditor.-(1) A financial creditor either by itself or jointly … Shivakumar Reddy and Anr. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This Appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) is against a judgment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...
Delhi
Mar-30-2016
MRTP
order' or 'impugned orders') passed by the Competition Commission of India (hereafter 'CCI') under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter referred to as 'the Competition Act'). The impugned order dated 12th November, 2013 was passed pursuant to … is a body established under Section 7 of the Competition Act and performs the functions as mandated under Chapter IV of the Competition Act. CCI being a creature of the statute has to perform its functions and … 20,000 employees across 25 offices located in various parts of the country. 6. Micromax is an Indian company and its registered office is situated in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.
Delhi
Apr-10-2019
MRTP
all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … but not under Section 3 of the Act. Hearing on penalty is extended to all other cases under Chapter VI of the Act including for non-cooperation and gun-jumping, but not for penalties in respect of contraventions under … MOTORS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS + W.P.(C) 6610/2014 + W.P.(C) 6634/2014, CM APPL. 20409/2014 + W.P.(C) 7087/2014, CM APPL. 16614/2014,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Alleged Cartelization by Steel Producers
Competition Commission of India CCI
Jan-09-2014
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »