Advanced Search Results
Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Private Ltd & Anr. Vs.competition ...
Delhi
Dec-18-2018
MRTP
CCI may, in a given case, be entitled to invoke provisions of Chapter VI of the 2002 Act if the pre-condition of the various Sections … 14 of 42 contravention of orders of the CCI or DG under Section 42 to 44 of the Competition Act and not for contravention of Section 3 and 4 of the Competition Act by the Company is misconceived. … the learned Single Judge with respect to the scope, ambit and applicability of Section 48 of the Companies Act, 2002 were never raised before and / or dealt by the Division Bench in Cadila (Supra). It is stated … with Mr. Vaibhav Choukse & Ms. Akansha Mehta, Advs. for R-3 to 5 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others
Delhi
Feb-23-2012
MRTP
entertain the complaint on the basis of the information of respondent No. 2 under Section 19(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act). The Commission has rejected the stand of the petitioner that it is not an ‘enterprise’ within … the Act. If it is an ‘enterprise’ under Section 2(h) of the Act, the Commission gets jurisdiction under Chapter IV of the Act. 20. The Commission has taken note of Section 54 of the Act, which provides … Commission itself and the said issues shall be decided by the Commission. 5. Thereafter the petitioner moved an application dated 30.03.2011 before the Director General
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUttarakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing Board and Ors. Vs.competiti ...
Delhi
Oct-17-2017
MRTP
of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) LPA6742017 Page 1 of 8 made under Section 26(1) of The Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟) expressing prima facie opinion that the Board had restricted production by Indian … the Act. If it is an „enterprise‟ under Section 2(h) of the Act, the Commission gets jurisdiction under Chapter IV of the Act.20. The Commission has taken note of Section 54 of the Act, which provides that … Chapter IV of the Act.20. The Commission has taken note of Section 54 of the Act, which provides that the Central Government may, by notification,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jul-14-2021
Land Acquisition
Electricity Act, 2003; Section 27 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997; Section 61 of the Competition Act, 2002. 24Section 9 of the Civil Procedure Code 12 legislature wishes those disputes arising from such new legislation not … was of the firm opinion that the tribunals should be a real substitute to High Courts. While scrutinizing Chapter II of the Act which dealt with the establishment of tribunals, this Court expressed its view that a … Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021 as ultra vires Articles 14, 21 and 50 of the Constitution of India inasmuch as these are violative of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...
Delhi
Mar-30-2016
MRTP
order' or 'impugned orders') passed by the Competition Commission of India (hereafter 'CCI') under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter referred to as 'the Competition Act'). The impugned order dated 12th November, 2013 was passed pursuant to … is a body established under Section 7 of the Competition Act and performs the functions as mandated under Chapter IV of the Competition Act. CCI being a creature of the statute has to perform its functions and … Act. This, essentially, is the principal controversy involved in these petitions. Introduction 5. Ericsson was founded in 1876 and is a flagship company of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.
Delhi
Apr-10-2019
MRTP
all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … but not under Section 3 of the Act. Hearing on penalty is extended to all other cases under Chapter VI of the Act including for non-cooperation and gun-jumping, but not for penalties in respect of contraventions under … “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, 53F and 61 (“the impugned provisions” hereafter) of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCoal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jun-15-2023
Land Acquisition
the second appellant, Western Coalfields Limited, a subsidiary company of the first appellant cannot be bound by the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). In other words, having regard to the very object and purpose for … prohibits anti-competitive agreements and also abuse of dominant position. It also regulates combinations as explained in Section 6. Chapter 3 deals with the establishment of the CCI. Section 9 provides that the Selection Committee for appointment of … appellant is the holding company and there are subsidiary companies under it. 5 This is contemplated under the Nationalisation Act. The mantle of operating the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCompetition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.
Delhi
Dec-02-2014
MRTP
are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1 … property both movable and immovable and to contract and shall by the said name sue or be sued. Chapter IV of the Act deals with the duties, powers and functions of CCI. As held in CCI vs. … passed by the CCI under Section 26(2) is made appealable under Section 53-A. It was made clear in CCI v. SAIL (supra) that the directions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCompetition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.
Delhi
Dec-02-2014
MRTP
are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1 … property both movable and immovable and to contract and shall by the said name sue or be sued. Chapter IV of the Act deals with the duties, powers and functions of CCI. As held in CCI vs. … passed by the CCI under Section 26(2) is made appealable under Section 53-A. It was made clear in CCI v. SAIL (supra) that the directions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Alleged Cartelization by Steel Producers
Competition Commission of India CCI
Jan-09-2014
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »