Advanced Search Results

Monsanto Technology Llc and Ors. Vs.nuziveedu Seeds Limited & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

without prejudice to termination notice. CS (Comm) 132/2016 Page 50 of 96 65. The Parliament had enacted the Competition Act, 2002, some of the provisions of which came into force on 31.3.2003, its objective being to provide, keeping in … the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to sub-serve the common good. The first Chapter in Part XI of the Constitution deals with legislative powers, Article 246, referring, inter alia, to the Seventh

Uttarakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing Board and Ors. Vs.competiti ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) LPA6742017 Page 1 of 8 made under Section 26(1) of The Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟) expressing prima facie opinion that the Board had restricted production by Indian … the Act. If it is an „enterprise‟ under Section 2(h) of the Act, the Commission gets jurisdiction under Chapter IV of the Act.20. The Commission has taken note of Section 54 of the Act, which provides that … respondent No.2 is represented through counsel. Caveat is discharged. LPA6742017 & C.M. 37420-21/2017 1. The Uttrakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing Board impugnes an order of the

Sri Devi Hotels Private Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director and anr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 29, 29(1), 31 and 31(1); Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act; Transfer of Property Act, 1881 - Sections 69; State Financial Corporations (Amendment) Act, 1956; State Financial Corporations (Amendment) Act, 1962; State Financial Corporations (Amendment) Act, 1985

Reported in : 2007(3)ALT446

157 and Jasbir Kaur v. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation Limited AIR 2002 P & H 74 as well as in Thresiamma (3 supra), High … was not preceded by due and adequate publicity and notice so as to fetch the best possible and competitive market price and the process should therefore be invalidated. Reliance for this contention is placed on the decisions … and Mr. J. Pardhasarathi, learned Standing Counsel for the A.P. State Financial Corporation.2. The petitioner claims that the action of the Andhra Pradesh State Finance Corporation ('the Corporation') in calling for sealed tender-cum-bid for the sale of … acceptance by this Court.41. The scheme of the Act, the provisions in Chapter-III, in particular Section 25 are clearly indicative of the purposes and functions

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

order' or 'impugned orders') passed by the Competition Commission of India (hereafter 'CCI') under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter referred to as 'the Competition Act'). The impugned order dated 12th November, 2013 was passed pursuant to … is a body established under Section 7 of the Competition Act and performs the functions as mandated under Chapter IV of the Competition Act. CCI being a creature of the statute has to perform its functions and … these petitions are similar and, therefore, these petitions were taken up together. 3. Both Micromax and Intex have alleged that Ericsson, which has a large

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … but not under Section 3 of the Act. Hearing on penalty is extended to all other cases under Chapter VI of the Act including for non-cooperation and gun-jumping, but not for penalties in respect of contraventions under

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the second appellant, Western Coalfields Limited, a subsidiary company of the first appellant cannot be bound by the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). In other words, having regard to the very object and purpose for … prohibits anti-competitive agreements and also abuse of dominant position. It also regulates combinations as explained in Section 6. Chapter 3 deals with the establishment of the CCI. Section 9 provides that the Selection Committee for appointment of Members

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1 … property both movable and immovable and to contract and shall by the said name sue or be sued. Chapter IV of the Act deals with the duties, powers and functions of CCI. As held in CCI vs. … the CCI into any alleged contravention of the provisions contained in Section 3(1) or Section 4(1) on its own motion or on receipt of any

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1 … property both movable and immovable and to contract and shall by the said name sue or be sued. Chapter IV of the Act deals with the duties, powers and functions of CCI. As held in CCI vs. … the CCI into any alleged contravention of the provisions contained in Section 3(1) or Section 4(1) on its own motion or on receipt of any

In Re: Alleged Cartelization by Steel Producers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986); (iii) Which are within the purview of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003); (iv) relating to an order of eviction which is appealable under section 28K of the … Authority of India Act, 1997 (24 of 1997) shall, on and from the commencement of Part XIV of Chapter VI of the Finance Act, 2017 (7 of 2017), be the Appellate Tribunal for the purposes of this … INSC791IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos. 3098-3099 of 2023 Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India …Appellant Versus Delhi International