Advanced Search Results

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited Vs. u.o.i and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

indulged in cartilisation, thereby influencing and rigging the prices, thus, violating the provisions of Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the ‘Act’). The CCI, as a result, imposed severe penalties in the form of fines under … of the Act which prohibits three kinds of practices as anti-competitive, was taken note of as follows:51. “20. Chapter II of the Act deals with three kinds of practices which are treated as anti-competitive and prohibited. These … A.K. SIKRI, J.4 All these appeals are filed against the orders dated 20th December, 2013 passed by the Competition Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

C. Venkatachalam Vs. Ajitkumar C. Shah and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 32, 33; Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 - Sections 29, 31, 32 - Rule 2(b); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 302, 303, 304; Merchandise Marks Act, 1887; Immigration and Asylum Act - Section 84; Constitution of India - Article 19

the impugned judgment the High Court aptly observed that many statutes, such as, Sales Tax, Income Tax and Competition Act also permit non-advocates to represent the parties before the authorities and those non-advocates cannot be said to practise … delivered by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition Nos. 1147 and 1425 of 2002. We propose to dispose of these appeals by a common judgment because same questions of law are involved … to permit appearances in particular cases - Notwithstanding anything contained in this Chapter, any court, authority, or person may permit any person, not enrolled as … the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition Nos. 1147 and 1425 of 2002. We propose to dispose of these appeals by a common judgment because

Union of India Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Union of India Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others

Uttarakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing Board and Ors. Vs.competiti ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Uttarakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing Board and Ors. Vs.competition Commission of India and Anr.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of India and Another

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … but not under Section 3 of the Act. Hearing on penalty is extended to all other cases under Chapter VI of the Act including for non-cooperation and gun-jumping, but not for penalties in respect of contraventions under … OF INDIA & ORS + W.P.(C) 6610/2014 + W.P.(C) 6634/2014, CM APPL. 20409/2014 + W.P.(C) 7087/2014, CM APPL. 16614/2014, CM APPL. 39827/2018 + W.P.(C) 7121/2014,

Intel Technology India Pvt Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties Intel Technology India Pvt Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India