Advanced Search Results

Act1: competition act 2002 chapter 1 · Page 1 of about 776 results (0.058 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Oct 17 2017

Uttarakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing Board and Ors. Vs.competiti ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-17-2017

Subject : MRTP

of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) LPA6742017 Page 1 of 8 made under Section 26(1) of The Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟) expressing prima facie opinion that the Board had restricted production by Indian … the Act. If it is an „enterprise‟ under Section 2(h) of the Act, the Commission gets jurisdiction under Chapter IV of the Act.20. The Commission has taken note of Section 54 of the Act, which provides that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2012

Union of India Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-23-2012

Subject : MRTP

entertain the complaint on the basis of the information of respondent No. 2 under Section 19(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act). The Commission has rejected the stand of the petitioner that it is not an ‘enterprise’ within … the Act. If it is an ‘enterprise’ under Section 2(h) of the Act, the Commission gets jurisdiction under Chapter IV of the Act. 20. The Commission has taken note of Section 54 of the Act, which provides

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2021

Dena Bank (now Bank Of Baroda) Vs. C. Shivakumar Reddy

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-04-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … initiate corporate insolvency resolution process in respect of such corporate debtor in the manner as provided under this Chapter. 267. Initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process by financial creditor.-(1) A financial creditor either by itself or jointly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Jul 14 2021

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-14-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electricity Act, 2003; Section 27 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997; Section 61 of the Competition Act, 2002. 24Section 9 of the Civil Procedure Code 12 legislature wishes those disputes arising from such new legislation not … was of the firm opinion that the tribunals should be a real substitute to High Courts. While scrutinizing Chapter II of the Act which dealt with the establishment of tribunals, this Court expressed its view that a … Bar Association has filed this Writ Petition seeking a declaration that Sections 12 and 13 of the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2016

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2016

Subject : MRTP

order' or 'impugned orders') passed by the Competition Commission of India (hereafter 'CCI') under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter referred to as 'the Competition Act'). The impugned order dated 12th November, 2013 was passed pursuant to … is a body established under Section 7 of the Competition Act and performs the functions as mandated under Chapter IV of the Competition Act. CCI being a creature of the statute has to perform its functions and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : MRTP

all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … but not under Section 3 of the Act. Hearing on penalty is extended to all other cases under Chapter VI of the Act including for non-cooperation and gun-jumping, but not for penalties in respect of contraventions under … IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 12.2018 Pronounced on:10. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 11467/2018, CM APPL. 44376-44378/2018 MAHINDRA ELECTRIC MOBILITY

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 2023

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-15-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

the second appellant, Western Coalfields Limited, a subsidiary company of the first appellant cannot be bound by the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). In other words, having regard to the very object and purpose for … prohibits anti-competitive agreements and also abuse of dominant position. It also regulates combinations as explained in Section 6. Chapter 3 deals with the establishment of the CCI. Section 9 provides that the Selection Committee for appointment of … of dominant position was ascribed to the appellants. The appeal was dismissed. 12. The second respondent had provided information to the CCI which the CCI

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2014

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-02-2014

Subject : MRTP

are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1 … property both movable and immovable and to contract and shall by the said name sue or be sued. Chapter IV of the Act deals with the duties, powers and functions of CCI. As held in CCI vs.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2014