Advanced Search Results
Edpuganti Bapanaiah Vs. Sri K.S. Raju and Two ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-03-2007
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 17, 20, 29(2), 40, 48 and 57; Contempt of Courts (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 10 to 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3) and 12(4); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10E(1), 10E(4), 10E(4C), 10E(4D), 10E(5), 10E(6), 10F, 58(9), 58A(9), 58A(10), 111, 111A, 155, 224, 269, 397, 398, 402, 408 and 634A; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Bihar and Orissa Co-operative Societies Act - Sections 6(2) and 48; Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 3(2), 9A, 9A(1) and 9A(2); Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Contempt of Courts (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 10, 100A and 151; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 196; Indian Penal Cod
2007(5)ALD380; 2007(5)ALT236; [2007]139CompCas545(AP); [2007]79SCL468(AP)
contempt by interfering in the course of administration of justice, by violating and disobeying the orders of the Company Law Board, Southern Region Bench at Chennai in C.P.35 of 2000, dated 29.02.2000 and order in C.A. 344/634-A/SRB/2001, dated … dated 29.02.2000 and order in C.A. 344/634-A/SRB/2001, dated 21.08.2001 and also for breach of affidavits filed before the Company Law Board and this Court in Company Appeal No. 7 of 2001, and to pass such other order or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri A.P. JaIn Vs. Faridabad Metal Udyog (P) Ltd.
Delhi
Mar-10-2003
Company
Companies Act - Sections 397 and 398; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1998 - Sections 68; Limitation Act
2003IIIAD(Delhi)624; [2005]123CompCas785(Delhi); 104(2003)DLT909; 2003(71)DRJ523; [2004]50SCL268(Delhi)
the order dated 27th July, 1998 by which while holding other pleas in favor of the appellant, the Company Law Board has dismissed the petition on the ground of laches of seven years and the indulgence in forum … 397 and 398 relating to oppression and mismanagement under Chapter VI were required to be heard by the Company Law Board. The proceedings in this Court were transferred to Company Law Board on 10th September, 1996 by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSundaresh Bhatt Vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs
Supreme Court of India
Aug-26-2022
Land Acquisition
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) arises out of the impugned judgment dated 22.11.2021 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (“NCLAT”) in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.236 of 2021. Vide the impugned judgment, the … impugned judgment, the NCLAT has allowed the appeal filed by the respondent against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad (“NCLT”) /Adjudicating Authority whereby the Adjudicating Authority directed the release of certain goods lying in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Liberty House Group Pte Ltd. Vs.state Bank of India & Ors.
Delhi
Feb-22-2019
Land Acquisition
into motion by the SBI under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code). The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Chandigarh, on 20th December, 2017 admitted the said application and the defendant no.4 Mr. Dinkar T. … the Code bars jurisdiction of the Civil Court in respect of any matter on which NCLT or National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has jurisdiction under the Code. NCLT Chandigarh has jurisdiction over the CIR Process of Castex
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Hoffland Finance Ltd.
Company Law Board CLB
May-12-1997
Company
Matched in: Court Company Law Board CLB
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGlas Trust Company Llc Vs. Byju Raveendran
Supreme Court of India
Oct-23-2024
Right to Information
57 F. Conclusion ............................................................................................... 60 Page 3 of 611. This appeal arises from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai1 dated 2 August 2024.2 The National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru,3 admitted the application instituted by … arises from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai1 dated 2 August 2024.2 The National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru,3 admitted the application instituted by the second respondent under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Principal Chief Conservator Of Forests Vs. M/s. Wind World India L ...
Karnataka
Apr-13-2023
Land Acquisition
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS; QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED0607.2022 PASSED BY THE HONBLE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD DIVISION BENCH IN I.A. 473(AHM) 2022 IN CP (IB) No.14/2018 (ANNEXURE - A). 3 THIS WRIT … Chief Conservator of Forests, Government of Karnataka. The State calls in question an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad (‘the Tribunal’ for short) on an application filed under Section 60 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Consultancy Services Limited Vs. Vishal Ghisulal Jain
Supreme Court of India
Nov-23-2021
Service Tax
Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1 This appeal arises from a judgment dated 24 June 2020 of the National 1 Company Law Appellate Tribunal . The NCLAT upheld the interim order dated 18 2 December 2019 of the National Company … Law Appellate Tribunal . The NCLAT upheld the interim order dated 18 2 December 2019 of the National Company Law Tribunal which stayed the termination by the appellant of its Facilities Agreement dated 1 December 2016 3 with
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaptist Church Trust Association and anr. Vs. Member, Company Law Boar ...
Kolkata
Jan-18-1985
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Section 186
[1986]60CompCas381(Cal)
trust association.16. In such background, that trust association some time in June, 1982, made an application before the Company Law Board under Section 186 of the Companies Act, 1956, for, inter alia, the following orders :(a) An enquiry … order a meeting of the trust association to be called, held and conducted in such manner as the Company Law Board thinks fit. 17. Petitioner No. 2 opposed the application of the trust association and affirmed an affidavit
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPramod Gupta and anr. Vs. Anz Grindlays Bank and anr.
Delhi
Mar-11-1999
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 111;Special Courts (Transfer of Security) Act, 1992
1999IIIAD(Delhi)180; 79(1999)DLT16; 1999(49)DRJ803
array of parties in the application filed by the ANZ Grindlays Bank, hereinafter called the 'Bank', before the Company Law Board. In Co.A.6/94, the Bank has filed the appeal challenging the order passed by the Company Law Board … the Company Law Board. In Co.A.6/94, the Bank has filed the appeal challenging the order passed by the Company Law Board dated 15/16.3.1994. In Co.A.8/94 the order dated 15/16.3.1994 passed by the Company Law Board is challenged by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »