Advanced Search Results

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

1B and 1C of the Companies Act, 1956. These parts were inserted into the Companies Act, by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002. Thereby, provision was made for the constitution of the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law … issue adjudicated upon, pertained to the constitutional validity of the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, and more particularly, Sections 4 and 55 thereof, whereby Articles 31C and 368 of the Constitution, came to be amended. The majority

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

take note of 3 developments that have taken place, one in the year 2002 in the form of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the second in the same year 2002 in the form of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, … High Court went to the extent of holding that in the light of Section 35 of the Securitisation Act, 2002, Section 22 of SICA does not survive anymore. (vi) In Nabha Industries Ltd vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Chapters 1-B and 1-C of the Companies Act, 6 (2010) 11 SCC112 PART A1956as inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act 2002 which provided for the constitution of a National Company Law Tribunal7 and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal8 … Tribunal by virtue of Section 184 of Finance Act, 2017. Nevertheless, such 98 uniformity cannot be attained at the cost of discouraging meritorious candidates from … demonstrate an apparent disparity in 96 age of superannuation of Members and Chairpersons/Presiding Officers of different Tribunals. Illustratively, Section 14D of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 provides a Member of Telecom Disputes Settlement and

Tellabs, Inc. Vs. Makor Issues and Rights, Ltd.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Private securities fraud actions, however, if not adequately contained, can be employed abusively to impose substantial costs on companies and individuals whose conduct conforms to the law. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Dabit … true. See Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit , 507 U. S. 163 , 164. Second , courts must consider the complaint in its entirety, as well as other sources courts ordinarily examine when … a court’s comparative assessment of plausible inferences would impinge upon the Seventh Amendment right to jury trial. Congress, as creator of federal statutory claims, has … low of $15.87. Ibid . On December 3, 2002, the Shareholders filed a class action in the … knew the opposite was true. Id., at 94-95, 98. From December 2000 until the spring of 2001, … 21, 2007 As a check against abusive litigation in private securities fraud actions, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) includes exacting pleading … 2 ] 549 U. S. ___ (2007). II Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. Vs. Reliance Industries Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Oil Fields (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 3; Economic Zone and other Maritime Zone Act, 1976; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 36, 39, 235 to 251, 391 to 394, 433 and 643; Evidence Act - Sections 57 to 62; Income Tax Act - Sections 2(19AA), 2(19AAA) and 2(41A); Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002; Board of Directors Act; Contract Act - Sections 17; U.K. Act - Sections 206; Constitution of India - Article 297; Petroleum and Natural Gas Rules, 1959; Companies Rules

Reported in : [2009]149CompCas129(Bom); [2008]82SCL303(Bom)

to a company in respect of which an order has been made before the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002 sanctioning a compromise or an arrangement.393. Information as to compromises or arrangements with creditors and members. -(1) where … gas under the PSC.39. On 7.11.2006/8.11.2006, a Company Application No. 1122/06 under Section 392 of the Companies Act, 1956 (the Act) has been filed before … and directions given to MDA personally under the MOU to ensure that the gas supply contract is robust. Secondly, what, if any, are the appropriate changes that could be made in order to give meaning and effect … to express them.Thus in Reardon-Smith Line Ltd. v. Hansen-Tangen [1976] 1 W.L.R. 989 Lord Wilberforce said:When one speaks of the intention of the parties to

Shri Vishram Jaya Shetkar Alias Manohar Jaya Shetkar and Others Vs. Sh ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Civil Procedure by virtue of section 5 r/w section 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002? 11. Mr. D. J. Pangam, learned Advocate, argued on behalf of the plaintiffs whereas, Mr. Galileo Teles, learned … This Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 30/4/2003 passed by the learned First Additional District Judge, … Goa, Margao (First Appellate Court, for short) in Regular Civil Appeal No. 98/1999. 2. The said Regular Civil Appeal was filed by the defendant of

Novartis AG Vs Venkata Narayana Active Ingredients Pvt Ltd

Court : Chennai

to the provisions of this Act, the term of every patent granted, after the commencement of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (38 of 2002), and the term of every patent which has not expired and has not ceased to … the answers to questions 12 to 14 and 31 to 58 regarding supplies made by the defendant to companies in Egypt. Referring to the Advocate Commissioner’s reports (Exs.P11 and P20), he pointed out that the defendant had … that the above mentioned products are best selling pharmaceutical products of the second plaintiff, which is a subsidiary of the first plaintiff and the user … VII Rules 1 and 2 of CPC read with Proviso 1 to Section 7 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of … to which application was abandoned. Referring to WO 98/19998, learned counsel contended that the only change between

Shri Vishram Jaya Shetkar Alias Manohar Jaya Shetkar and Others Vs. Sh ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Civil Procedure by virtue of section 5 r/w section 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002? 11. Mr. D. J. Pangam, learned Advocate, argued on behalf of the plaintiffs whereas, Mr. Galileo Teles, learned … This Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 30/4/2003 passed by the learned First Additional District Judge, … Goa, Margao (First Appellate Court, for short) in Regular Civil Appeal No. 98/1999. 2. The said Regular Civil Appeal was filed by the defendant of

Sachish Chandra JaIn and anr. Vs. Shri Bhagwan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 and 100A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 16; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2002(4)MPHT360; 2002(3)MPLJ504

Matched in: Citation 2002(4)MPHT360; 2002(3)MPLJ504

Arun Kumar Jagatramka Vs. Jindal Steel And Power Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

second amendment was made to various provisions of IBC, including Section 29A, under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2018, effective from 6 June 2018. A proviso was added to sub-Section (g) of Section 29A. Section 29A … scheme of compromise and arrangement under Section 230 of 4 5 the Companies Act, 2013 . The judgment was rendered in an appeal filed by … of India under Section 3 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (54 of 2002); (e) an Alternate Investment Fund registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India; (f) … between section 23 of the Travancore Cochin High Court Act and section 98(3) Civil Procedure Code resolved by holding the latter to be special law);