Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: companies second amendment act 2002 section 96 · Page 1 of about 677 results (0.110 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 25 2014

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-25-2014

Subject : Direct Taxation

1B and 1C of the Companies Act, 1956. These parts were inserted into the Companies Act, by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002. Thereby, provision was made for the constitution of the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law … issue adjudicated upon, pertained to the constitutional validity of the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, and more particularly, Sections 4 and 55 thereof, whereby Articles 31C and 368 of the Constitution, came to be amended. The majority … that of constitutional interpretation, is equally to be avoided. xxx xxx xxx 96. It has been brought to our notice that one reason why these

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2026

Pannalal Bhansali versus Bharti Telecom Limited & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-10-2026

Reported in : [2026] 3 S.C.R. 493

running foul of the mandate declared in 2010-MBA3. The Constitution Bench in 2010-MBA3 considered the challenge against the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, constituting the NCLT & NCLAT; pointedly for our purpose, with reference to Section 10-FL insofar as the constitution … of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in CAAT No. 340 of 2019. With Civil Appeal No(s). 9862, 9601, 9797, 7666, 9478, 9599, 9849, and 13824 of 2025Appearances for PartiesAdvs. for the Appellant(s): K. Parameshwar, Sr. Adv.,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2002

Rajabhau Mahadeorao Rahate Vs. Dinkar Shantaram Ingole

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-16-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 2002(4)ALLMR281

Matched in: Citation 2002(4)ALLMR281

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 04 2003

Nasik Hing Supplying Company Vs. Annapurna Gruh Udyog Bhandar

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-04-2003

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4, 4(1), 96, 100, 100A, 104, 104(1), 104(2) and 105 - Order 43, Rule 1; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 97, 109(5) and 109(8); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 and 2002

Reported in : AIR2003Guj275; (2003)2GLR926; (2003)2PLR926; [2003]46SCL118(Guj)

Judge of the High Court in writ proceedings has been done away with, consequently now with the C.P.C. Amendment Act, 2002, abolition of Letters Patent Appeals is confined to appeals against the judgment of a single Judge exercising his … Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 or Section 202 of the Companies Act and other similar local or special Acts. If these special Acts … of Section 100A of the C.P.C. that it prohibits any kind of second appeal. 7. On the other hand, Mr. G.N. Shah, learned Counsel appearing … ... ... ... ... Part VII of the Code contains the provisions for appeals. 'Appeals from original decrees Section 96. Appeal from original decree - (1) Save as otherwise expressly provided in the body of this Code or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2002

Rajabhau S/O Mahadeorao Rahate Vs. Dinkar S/O Shantaram Ingole

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-16-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 41, Rule 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 32(2)

Reported in : 2003(1)BomCR40; (2001)1BOMLR87; 2002(3)MhLj921

Matched in: Citation 2003(1)BomCR40; (2001)1BOMLR87; 2002(3)MhLj921

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2003

Bhenoy G. Dembla Vs. Prem Kutir (P) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-30-2003

Subject : CivilCompany

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F and 111

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR575; 2004(2)BomCR280; [2003]117CompCas643(Bom); 2003(4)MhLj883; [2003]47SCL372(Bom)

allowed an appeal filed by the Respondent under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 against an order of the Company Law Board. The maintainability … in certain cases against the decision of a Single Judge in a second appeal. Such an appeal in effect amounted to a third appeal. Consequently, … necessary intendment and not otherwise.6. Section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure was initially inserted by an Amendment Act of 1976. The Statement of Objects and Reasons indicated that Letters Patents Appeals lie in certain cases against … The amended provisions of Section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure came into force on 1st July, 2002. Section 100A as amended provides as follows :'No further appeal in certain cases.--Notwithstanding anything contained in any Letters Patent … noted that Section 4(1) as well as Sections 96, 100, 104 and 105 of the Cr.PC. preserve

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2002

Jagdishchandra Bhulabhai Patel (Decd.) Through His Heirs Rekhaben and ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-11-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Order 43, Rule 1; General Clauses Act - Sections 6

Reported in : (2003)1GLR789

the same order of the Mamlatdar and A.L.T. passed in 1960.'9. The second limb of the argument of Mr. Vyas is that Section 32(2) of … Code and effect of repeal and, savings provisions contained in Section 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999. Mrs. K.A. Mehta has further submitted that the amended provisions are equally applicable to the pending revisions … dated 24-7-2002 in the case of Parakramsinh Vikramsinh Jadeja v. Yogi Corporation, 2002 (3) GLR 2040, had an occasionto examine a Revision Application in the … may not intervene in the order passed by the authorities below. It has been further submitted that in Section 96 as well as in Section 100 which deal with appeals, the word 'shall' is used whereas in Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 2003

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Forward Seamen Union and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-22-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 95, 96, 97 and 97A; ;Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : 2004(3)CHN509

considered in the light of the amended provisions of Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 as amended by Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002. The bazarmen could claim the benefit of seamen or seafarers only if they could satisfy the test of … the Shipping Corporation of India for the vessel MV Akbar and the second one for 79 bazarmen, who were allotted duties by FSUI for MV … any capacity on board of sea-going ship other than a Government ship used for military or non-commercial purposes. Section 96 prohibits supply or engagement of seamen in contravention of the said Act and Section 97 prohibits receipt of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2018

State Bank of India Vs. V. Ramakrishnan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-14-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

provisions of Sections 15 to 21 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Interestingly, the Companies Amendment Act, 2002 omitted a provision similar to Section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Consequently, creditors … his assets or his legal rights or beneficial interest therein; (3) Where an order admitting the application under Section 96 has been made in relation to a firm, the 15 moratorium under sub-section (1) shall operate against all … guarantors against whom insolvency resolution processes may be initiated under Part III. Secondly, the protection of the moratorium under these Sections is far greater than

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2002

Sachish Chandra JaIn and anr. Vs. Shri Bhagwan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-05-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 and 100A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 16; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2002(4)MPHT360; 2002(3)MPLJ504

Matched in: Citation 2002(4)MPHT360; 2002(3)MPLJ504

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial