Advanced Search Results

Arcelormittal India Private Limited Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

provisions of Sections 15 to 21 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Interestingly, the Companies Amendment Act, 2002 omitted a provision similar to Section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Consequently, creditors … and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2017, together with the amendment made by the Insolvency and 40 Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2018. Section 29A, as introduced by the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance, 2017, on 23.11.2017, reads as … the NCLT extended the duration of the corporate insolvency resolution process by 90 days beyond the initial period of 180 days, i.e., upto 3 29.4.2018.

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Chapters 1-B and 1-C of the Companies Act, 6 (2010) 11 SCC112 PART A1956as inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act 2002 which provided for the constitution of a National Company Law Tribunal7 and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal8 … Judges, the Members appointed to the tribunal should be possessed of equivalent 90 qualifications and commensurate stature of District Judges. The conditions of service of … demonstrate an apparent disparity in 96 age of superannuation of Members and Chairpersons/Presiding Officers of different Tribunals. Illustratively, Section 14D of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 provides a Member of Telecom Disputes Settlement and

Pannalal Bhansali versus Bharti Telecom Limited & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 3 S.C.R. 493

running foul of the mandate declared in 2010-MBA3. The Constitution Bench in 2010-MBA3 considered the challenge against the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, constituting the NCLT & NCLAT; pointedly for our purpose, with reference to Section 10-FL insofar as the constitution … 1 SCR 284 : AIR 1952 SC 75; LIC v. Escorts Ltd and Others [1985] Supp. 3 SCR 909 : (1986) 1 SCC 264; Claude-Lila Parulekar (SMT.) v. Sakal Papers (P) Ltd. and Others [2005] 2 SCR

In Re: Ritesh Polysters Limited a

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2005)123CompCas348

contentious issue, it would be necessary to extract the provisions of Section 621A as stood prior to the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, which reads as under: - "621A: Composition of certain offences: - (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code

P.Kumar Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

for the petitioner would submit that Chapter IV A of the Companies Act was introduced by means of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002. He would further submit that as per the said amendment, in the place of ".Company Law Board"., ".Tribunal". … Government Arts College, Nandanam. This Court had the benefit of hearing them also. According to them, as per Section 388-E of the Act, which was introduced by means of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the ".Tribunal". alone … to award full marks with reference to Question Nos.55, 61, 73, 77, 90, 102, 103, 111 and 150 for the Booklet Series B in the

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

1B and 1C of the Companies Act, 1956. These parts were inserted into the Companies Act, by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002. Thereby, provision was made for the constitution of the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law … issue adjudicated upon, pertained to the constitutional validity of the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, and more particularly, Sections 4 and 55 thereof, whereby Articles 31C and 368 of the Constitution, came to be amended. The majority … competence under the appropriate entry in the Seventh Schedule. xxx xxx xxx 90. But when we say that the legislature has the competence to make

Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. Vs. Reliance Industries Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Oil Fields (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 3; Economic Zone and other Maritime Zone Act, 1976; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 36, 39, 235 to 251, 391 to 394, 433 and 643; Evidence Act - Sections 57 to 62; Income Tax Act - Sections 2(19AA), 2(19AAA) and 2(41A); Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002; Board of Directors Act; Contract Act - Sections 17; U.K. Act - Sections 206; Constitution of India - Article 297; Petroleum and Natural Gas Rules, 1959; Companies Rules

Reported in : [2009]149CompCas129(Bom); [2008]82SCL303(Bom)

to a company in respect of which an order has been made before the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002 sanctioning a compromise or an arrangement.393. Information as to compromises or arrangements with creditors and members. -(1) where … gas under the PSC.39. On 7.11.2006/8.11.2006, a Company Application No. 1122/06 under Section 392 of the Companies Act, 1956 (the Act) has been filed before … total petroleum produced and saved in any contract year, in this case 90%. 10% of the production of petroleum is treated as profit petroleum. In … and directions given to MDA personally under the MOU to ensure that the gas supply contract is robust. Secondly, what, if any, are the appropriate changes that could be made in order to give meaning and effect

P.S. Sathappan (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Andhra Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9), 3, 4, 4(1), 35A, 96 to 103, 104, 104(1), 104(2), 105, 105(2), 115, 117, 135, 217(1), 218D, 278 and 282 - Order 7, Rules 10 and 11 - Order 10, Rule 3 - Order 16, Rule 2 - Order 18, Rules 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 16 - Order 20, Rules 1 and 8 - Order 21, Rules 72, 90 and 92 - Order 33, Rule 7 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 35 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 49, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 136, 225, 329 and 372; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; ;Indian High Courts Act, 1861; Legislative Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 223; India (Adaptation of Existing Laws) Order, 1949; Independence Act, 1947 - Section

Reported in : AIR2004SC5152; 2004(5)CTC209; JT2004(8)SC464; (2005)1MLJ105(SC); RLW2005(1)SC19; 2004(8)SCALE601; (2004)11SCC672

in the Code by reason of Code of Civil Procedure amendment Act, 1976 or Code of Civil Procedure Amendment Act, 2002. In any event the provision of Section 100A of the Code being not retrospective in operation, the right … in Shankarlal Aggarwal's case : [1964]1SCR717 this Court while construing the provisions of Section 202 of the Indian Companies Act observed as follows : There was no doubt either that most of the orders or decisions in … Patent of the Madras High Court would govern the forum for a second appeal therefrom; the only restriction being that such an order must be … It was urged that as an order passed under Order XXI, Rule 90 of the Code can be appealed against only in terms of Sub-section

Videocon International Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Board of India (Amendment) Ordinance, 2002. The Ordinance was replaced by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Amendment) Act, 2002. Section 15Z, as amended is reproduced hereunder:- "15Z. Appeal to Supreme Court- Any person aggrieved by any decision or … law arising out of such order." (emphasis is ours) A perusal of Section 15Z reveals, that when the second appellate remedy was made available to an aggrieved party for the first time, the forum for the second … for Rs.1,600. On 19.12.1928, an application was made, under O. XXI, R. 90, Civil PC, by the present petitioner, who was one of the judgment-debtors,

Arunachalam Muthu Vs. Nafan Bv and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … 1. The Appellant has filed the above Appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the Act”) impugning the order dated 31st May 2012 passed by the … Nos. 3 and 4 during the arguments in sur-rejoinder as well. About 90 hours of judicial time was spent in hearing Company Petition No. 62