Advanced Search Results

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Vs. Amit Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Courts.4. It is stated that the recommendations of the Eradi Committee were accepted by the Government and Company (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 was passed providing for establishment of NCLT and NCLAT to take-over the functions which are being performed by … discharge the function of adjudicating ―the disputes between the licensees, and generating companies and to refer any dispute for arbitration‖. Therefore, any issue in relation … Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 20167. On 15 October 2019, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal by the appellant8 under Section 61 of the IBC. The decision by the NCLAT is called into question. 2 The appellant assails the order

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

take note of 3 developments that have taken place, one in the year 2002 in the form of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the second in the same year 2002 in the form of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, … High Court went to the extent of holding that in the light of Section 35 of the Securitisation Act, 2002, Section 22 of SICA does not survive anymore. (vi) In Nabha Industries Ltd vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation … 23 19 ==================================================================”155. 2”60. 30 13 ==================================================================”177. 4”54. 42 21 ==================================================================”152. 2”42. 61 15 ==================================================================”193. 4”65. 34 30 ==================================================================”115. 1”48. 21 22 ==================================================================”97. 1”39. 17

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

1B and 1C of the Companies Act, 1956. These parts were inserted into the Companies Act, by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002. Thereby, provision was made for the constitution of the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law … issue adjudicated upon, pertained to the constitutional validity of the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, and more particularly, Sections 4 and 55 thereof, whereby Articles 31C and 368 of the Constitution, came to be amended. The majority … constitutional and is to be interpreted in the manner we have indicated.” 61. Reference was then made to Union of India v. Madras Bar Association,

Sharath Rukmangada and Another Vs. Cauvery Papers Limited (In Liqn), R ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Company

or before or after commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960] (65 of 1960) (3) ***Omitted by the Companies (Second Amendment Act) Act, 2002 (4) Nothing in sub-section (1) or sub- section (3) shall apply to any proceeding pending in

C.Mangala Vijayalakshmi vs K.S.Kasimaris

Court : Chennai

‘Any person aggrieved by any decisionor order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … CKJ) Prayer in O.S.A.No.430 & 431 of 2001: Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent read with Section 483 of Companies Act 1/1956 to set aside the order passed in C.P.Nos.274, 199 of 1998 dated 19.10.2001 … Rajan 53.Ms.S.Annalakshmi Jansi 54.Mr.R.Munusamy 55.Ms.P.Valliammal 56.Mr.R.Arunachalam 57.Mr.J.Karunakaran 58.Mr.M.Akbar Basha 59.Thirugnanam Mothilal 60.P.Sathyapriya 61.M.Nandinidevi 62.M.Deepa Sundaram (RR59 to 62 brought on record as LRs Of the

Arcelormittal India Private Limited Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

provisions of Sections 15 to 21 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Interestingly, the Companies Amendment Act, 2002 omitted a provision similar to Section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Consequently, creditors … and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2017, together with the amendment made by the Insolvency and 40 Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2018. Section 29A, as introduced by the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance, 2017, on 23.11.2017, reads as … the resolution plan shall be in the manner and on the grounds laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 61. xxx xxx xxx 33. Initiation of liquidation.-(1) Where the Adjudicating Authority,- (a) before the expiry of the insolvency

P.Kumar Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

for the petitioner would submit that Chapter IV A of the Companies Act was introduced by means of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002. He would further submit that as per the said amendment, in the place of ".Company Law Board"., ".Tribunal". … Government Arts College, Nandanam. This Court had the benefit of hearing them also. According to them, as per Section 388-E of the Act, which was introduced by means of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the ".Tribunal". alone … the 3rd respondent to award full marks with reference to Question Nos.55, 61, 73, 77, 90, 102, 103, 111 and 150 for the Booklet Series

M/S. Olive Lifesciences Private Limited vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

as follows: -The petitioner is a Company incorporated and registered under the Companies Act, 1956. It is engaged in the business of manufacturing consumer products … Section 29-A: Provided also that nothing in the second proviso shall be construed as extension of period … it is hereby declared that on and from the date of commencement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2019, the provisions of this clause shall also apply to the corporate insolvency resolution process of a corporate … its property including any action under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (54 of 2002);(d) the recovery of any property by an owner or lessor where such property is occupied … plan has not been approved or rejected by the Adjudicating Authority;(ii) where an appeal has been preferred under Section 61 or Section 62 or such an appeal is not time barred under any provision of law for the

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

or decree of the Supreme Court.” 73. Relying on Section 6(2), which was introduced by way of the Amendment Act, 2002 (Act 14 of 2002) that came into force from 6-8-2002, it is submitted by Mr Rohatgi that the … any proprietary technology and is outsourced to foreign entities or entities under the ownership and control of foreign companies and corporations. The entire framework and working of the authentication procedure in terms of Section 8 is an … to be eligible for government subsidies and social safety net programmes. The second error arises because of the inability to cross-verify lists of eligible persons … of Mathew, J., in Gobind v. State of M.P. [1969 UJ (SC) 616]. While analysing the right to privacy as an ingredient of Article 21,

Santosh Maize Through Its Manager Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu Represen ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

1970 dated 14th March, 1970 4 The TNGST (Amendment) Act, 1993 (Act No.24 of 1993) 5 The TNGST (Second Amendment) Act, 1996 (Act No.37 of 1996) 2 (“Taxation Entry No.61”, hereafter) and the tax rate was reduced to 4% … the appellant is entitled to exemption from tax on maize starch in accordance with 15 The TNGST (Fourth Amendment) Act, 2002 9 Exemption Entry No.8, Mr. Mani prayed that the orders under challenge be set aside by declaring the … subsequent developments - the latter being crucial for the present purpose. Firstly, Section 28-A was inserted w.e.f. 6th November, 1997 by way of an amendment7