Advanced Search Results

Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Others. Vs. Securitie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Companies

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 55A(b), 55A(c), 56, 57, 58, 60B, 60B(1), (2), 2(19A), 60B(9), 235 to 241, 73, 73(1)(2A), 209-A , 68A(1)(a), 2(45AA), 81(1A), 234(1), 234(4)(a), 67(3), 62, 63, 108A, 109, 110, 117A, 117B, 117C, 56, 62, 63, 642, 642(4), 2(19A); Securities and Exchange Board of India (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 ; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 - Regulations 3, 6, 2(zc), 2(p), 2(n), 4(2), 5(1), 6, 7, 16(1), 20(1), 25, 26, 36, 37, 46, 57; Securities and Exchange Board of India(SEBI) Act 1992 - Section 11C, 11A, 15Z, 55A, 68A, 77A, 80A, 108, 109, 110 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 206, 206A, 207, 59 to 81,; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, Form No. 2A,; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act(SCR), 1956 - Section 2(h), 21, 73(1)(3), 28, 28(1)(b), 20; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Section 55A, 67(3); Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 2(19B), 60B(9), 60B(1)(2)(3), ; Constitution of India - Articles 129, ; Companies Act, 2006 - Sections 755, 760,; Food Safety Modernization(FSMA), Act 2000 - Section 85; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Section 45I(f) ; Companies Amendment Act 53 of 2000 - Section 81(1A); Insurance Act, 1938 - Section 2; Securities Laws (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 13, 16, 28(1)(b), 28(2); Indian Evidence Act - Section 114 ; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, 4D; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Rules, 2003 - Rule 2,; UPC (PA) Amendment Rules 2011 ; SCR Rules - Rule 19; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Amendment Rules 2011

Reported in : (2013)1SCC1

a recognized stock exchange. Section 60B, as already indicated, refers to IM. Section 2(19B) was inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1.4.2003, which reads as follows:“2(19B) "information memorandum" means a process undertaken prior to the filing of a … RHPs at different places over a period of nine years. Registrars of Companies could have refused registration under Section 60(3) of the Companies Act as well, if there was non-compliance of the provisions of the Companies Act. Learned

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Vs. Amit Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Courts.4. It is stated that the recommendations of the Eradi Committee were accepted by the Government and Company (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 was passed providing for establishment of NCLT and NCLAT to take-over the functions which are being performed by … discharge the function of adjudicating ―the disputes between the licensees, and generating companies and to refer any dispute for arbitration‖. Therefore, any issue in relation … of the respondents H Issues arising from the dispute I Jurisdiction of the NCLT/NCLAT over contractual disputes I.1 Section 60(5)(c): ―arising out of‖ and ―in relation to‖ I.2 Jurisdiction of NCLT and GERC I.3 Residuary jurisdiction of the

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

take note of 3 developments that have taken place, one in the year 2002 in the form of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the second in the same year 2002 in the form of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, … High Court went to the extent of holding that in the light of Section 35 of the Securitisation Act, 2002, Section 22 of SICA does not survive anymore. (vi) In Nabha Industries Ltd vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

1B and 1C of the Companies Act, 1956. These parts were inserted into the Companies Act, by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002. Thereby, provision was made for the constitution of the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law … issue adjudicated upon, pertained to the constitutional validity of the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, and more particularly, Sections 4 and 55 thereof, whereby Articles 31C and 368 of the Constitution, came to be amended. The majority … when it spoke of an alternative mechanism in Minerva Mills' case (supra).” 60. Reference may also be made to the decision rendered by this Court

Duroflex Ltd. Vs. Johnny Mathew

Court : Kerala

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 10, 10E(1), (1A), (4B) to (4D), 10F, 18, 111, 111(1), 111(2), 111(3), 111(4), 111(5), 111(7), 111(10), 113(4), 155 and 155(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29(2) and 137 - Article 137; Maharashtra Rent Control Act - Sections 18; Telangana Area Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 8A; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Securities Act, 1992; Special Court Act - Sections 9A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 196; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21

Reported in : (2008)2CompLJ314(Ker); [2007]75SCL569(Ker)

exercise and discharge such powers and functions as may be conferred on it before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 by or under this Act or any other law, and shall also exercise and discharge such other powers … An application (appeal) was filed by the first respondent before the Company Law Board, South Region Bench under Section 111(2) of the Companies Act (for short 'the Act') as the company refused to register the transaction of … 4to 24 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and so, the period of 60 days limitation prescribed in Section 8A has to be computed by applying

Subhash JaIn Vs. Pioneer Shopping Complex (P.) Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F, 397, 398, 402 and 634A; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : [2008]142CompCas533(Ker); [2007]79SCL289(Ker)

for gain:Provided that the provisions of this section shall not apply on and after the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002.Section 634A has conferred power on the Company Law Board to enforce its orders. Section 634A says that … to the interests of the company and also against public interest. Company petition was numbered as C.P. No. 60 of 1994 by the Company Law Board which came up for hearing on 18-9-1996 and the Company Law

Sharath Rukmangada and Another Vs. Cauvery Papers Limited (In Liqn), R ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Company

or before or after commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960] (65 of 1960) (3) ***Omitted by the Companies (Second Amendment Act) Act, 2002 (4) Nothing in sub-section (1) or sub- section (3) shall apply to any proceeding pending in … on 24.06.2015 itself without even issuing a notice to the applicants herein above mentioned as contemplated under Rule 60 of the Income Tax (Certificate Proceedings) Rules, 1962, which requires issuance of notice in Form ITCP-29 to the

Pawan Goel Vs. Kmg Milk Food Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CompanyLimitation

Reported in : [2008]142CompCas441(P& H); (2008)2CompLJ213(P& H); (2008)149PLR98; [2009]89SCL121(Punj& Har)

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board (made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002) may file an appeal to the High Court within 60 days from the date of communication of the … of filing the appeal, an application (C. M. No. 109 of 2007) was filed by the appellant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay of 140 days in preferring the appeal against

The Customs Superintendent, Central Excise Vs. Punjab Wireless System ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2007)4PLR4

in the custody of the Court (Tribunal), as has been sought to be substituted by way of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, from the date of the order for the winding of Company. For reference the aforesaid provision is reproduced … The claim of the Liquidator has been contested. The stand of respondent No. 1 is that pursuant to Section 71 of the Customs Act, 1962, no warehoused goods can be taken out of a warehouse except on

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

or decree of the Supreme Court.” 73. Relying on Section 6(2), which was introduced by way of the Amendment Act, 2002 (Act 14 of 2002) that came into force from 6-8-2002, it is submitted by Mr Rohatgi that the … any proprietary technology and is outsourced to foreign entities or entities under the ownership and control of foreign companies and corporations. The entire framework and working of the authentication procedure in terms of Section 8 is an … to be eligible for government subsidies and social safety net programmes. The second error arises because of the inability to cross-verify lists of eligible persons … certain transactions above specified threshold value in Rule 114-B of the Rules. 60.3. For achieving the objective of one PAN to one assessee, it is