Advanced Search Results

Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Others. Vs. Securitie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Companies

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 55A(b), 55A(c), 56, 57, 58, 60B, 60B(1), (2), 2(19A), 60B(9), 235 to 241, 73, 73(1)(2A), 209-A , 68A(1)(a), 2(45AA), 81(1A), 234(1), 234(4)(a), 67(3), 62, 63, 108A, 109, 110, 117A, 117B, 117C, 56, 62, 63, 642, 642(4), 2(19A); Securities and Exchange Board of India (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 ; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 - Regulations 3, 6, 2(zc), 2(p), 2(n), 4(2), 5(1), 6, 7, 16(1), 20(1), 25, 26, 36, 37, 46, 57; Securities and Exchange Board of India(SEBI) Act 1992 - Section 11C, 11A, 15Z, 55A, 68A, 77A, 80A, 108, 109, 110 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 206, 206A, 207, 59 to 81,; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, Form No. 2A,; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act(SCR), 1956 - Section 2(h), 21, 73(1)(3), 28, 28(1)(b), 20; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Section 55A, 67(3); Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 2(19B), 60B(9), 60B(1)(2)(3), ; Constitution of India - Articles 129, ; Companies Act, 2006 - Sections 755, 760,; Food Safety Modernization(FSMA), Act 2000 - Section 85; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Section 45I(f) ; Companies Amendment Act 53 of 2000 - Section 81(1A); Insurance Act, 1938 - Section 2; Securities Laws (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 13, 16, 28(1)(b), 28(2); Indian Evidence Act - Section 114 ; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, 4D; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Rules, 2003 - Rule 2,; UPC (PA) Amendment Rules 2011 ; SCR Rules - Rule 19; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Amendment Rules 2011

Reported in : (2013)1SCC1

a recognized stock exchange. Section 60B, as already indicated, refers to IM. Section 2(19B) was inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1.4.2003, which reads as follows:“2(19B) "information memorandum" means a process undertaken prior to the filing of a … been listed on any recognized stock exchange in India, being Public Issue under Section 73 read with Section 60B and allied provisions of the Companies Act and whether they had violated the Securities and Exchange Board of

Shri Vishram Jaya Shetkar Alias Manohar Jaya Shetkar and Others Vs. Sh ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Civil Procedure by virtue of section 5 r/w section 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002? 11. Mr. D. J. Pangam, learned Advocate, argued on behalf of the plaintiffs whereas, Mr. Galileo Teles, learned … This Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 30/4/2003 passed by the learned First Additional District Judge, … on the said sum of Rs.18,800/-, calculated at quarterly rests as from 6/10/1992 till the actual payment. 5. Case of the plaintiffs was as follows:

Mohd. Riyazur Rehman Siddiqui Vs. Deputy Director of Health Services

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 110, 110C, 140, 163A, 165 to 174, 175 and 176; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10F, 397, 398 and 483; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 71, 107 and 108; Specific Relief Act - Sections 6 and 6(3); Contempt of Courts Act - Sections 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Limitation Act - Sections 4 to 24; Defence of India Act; General Clauses Act, 1897; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 127(1), 217, 217(1), 218D and 218D(1); Kerala High Court Act - Sections 5; Indian Succession Act - Sections

Reported in : 2009ACJ585; 2008(6)MhLj941

under:483. Appeals from orders - Appeals from any order made or decision given before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, in the matter of the winding up of a company by the Court shall lie to the same … charter under which the High Court of Bombay functions, is not whittled down by the statutory provisions of Section 6(3) of the Specific Relief Act. In that case, the Supreme Court stated that any statutory provision barring an

Shri Vishram Jaya Shetkar Alias Manohar Jaya Shetkar and Others Vs. Sh ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Civil Procedure by virtue of section 5 r/w section 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002? 11. Mr. D. J. Pangam, learned Advocate, argued on behalf of the plaintiffs whereas, Mr. Galileo Teles, learned … This Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 30/4/2003 passed by the learned First Additional District Judge, … on the said sum of Rs.18,800/-, calculated at quarterly rests as from 6/10/1992 till the actual payment. 5. Case of the plaintiffs was as follows:

National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales TaxCompany

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 33C; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 and 394; Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy and Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : [2004]118CompCas556(Bom); (2004)2CompLJ160(Bom); [2004]51SCL629(Bom); [2004]135STC50(Bom)

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. By the Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy and Amendment) Act, 2002, published on May 4, 2002, Section 33C has been inserted into the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 ('the … is not competent to declare that for the purposes of sales tax, the date of amalgamation of the companies shall not be from the date declared by the court or the Central Government under the Companies Act, … by the court or the Central Government under the above Act and secondly, assuming the State has such legislative competence, then, such power cannot be … to PIL, during April 1, 1993, to November 10, 1994, was Rs. 64.57 crores and the sales tax provisionally collected pending approval of the scheme

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

take note of 3 developments that have taken place, one in the year 2002 in the form of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the second in the same year 2002 in the form of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, … High Court went to the extent of holding that in the light of Section 35 of the Securitisation Act, 2002, Section 22 of SICA does not survive anymore. (vi) In Nabha Industries Ltd vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation … Workers Union, Affiliated to ATP, Registration No.2935/SLM, Selliampalayam, Narasinghapuram (PO), Salem District. 6.Salem Textiles, Textile Workers Union, Selliampalayam, Narasinghapuram (PO), Salem District. (R-3 to R-6

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

or decree of the Supreme Court.” 73. Relying on Section 6(2), which was introduced by way of the Amendment Act, 2002 (Act 14 of 2002) that came into force from 6-8-2002, it is submitted by Mr Rohatgi that the … any proprietary technology and is outsourced to foreign entities or entities under the ownership and control of foreign companies and corporations. The entire framework and working of the authentication procedure in terms of Section 8 is an … to be eligible for government subsidies and social safety net programmes. The second error arises because of the inability to cross-verify lists of eligible persons

U.P. Cement Vetanbhogi Sahkari RIn Samiti Ltd. Vs. Official Liquidator

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilCompany

Reported in : [2010]97SCL196(All)

provides as follows:Appeals from orders.- Appeals from any order made or decision given before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, in the matter of the winding up of a company by the Court shall lie to the same … in Section 104(1) and incorporated Section 4 in the CPC. Thus now a specific exclusion was provided. After 2002, Section 100A reads as follows:100A. No furtherappealin certain cases.- Notwithstanding anything contained in any Letters Patent for any High … Section 483 was maintainable or not.10.1 Following was laid down in paragraphs 6, 7 and 8 of the judgment which is quoted below:6. The Court

Anju Timblo, Managing Director of Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Company

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board [made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002] may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … respondents. 4. Heard finally with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. 5. These appeals under Section 10F of Companies Act, 1956 (the Act, for short) arise out of the order dated 18/05/2015, passed by … and as such, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. 6. The facts, necessary for the disposal of the appeals, may be stated

Mr. Vijay Sharma and Mrs. Kirti Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Preconception and Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3A, 4(5), 6 and 31A; Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Amendment Act, 2002 - Sections 2; Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1997 - Sections 3 and 3(2); Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 - Sections 4, 4(2) and 5(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 39, 51A and 226

Reported in : AIR2008Bom29; 2007(6)ALLMR336; 2007(5)BomCR710

1994 (for short, 'the said Act') as amended by The Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Amendment Act, 2002 (for short, 'the Amendment Act, 2002'). 2. Before dealing with the contentions raised in the petition, it must … would be caused to a prospective mother who conceives a female child or a male child for the second or third time. The legislature has not appreciated that such anguish must also be termed as grave injury … the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 2, 3A, 4(5) and 6(c) of the Preconception and Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques