Advanced Search Results

Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Others. Vs. Securitie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Companies

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 55A(b), 55A(c), 56, 57, 58, 60B, 60B(1), (2), 2(19A), 60B(9), 235 to 241, 73, 73(1)(2A), 209-A , 68A(1)(a), 2(45AA), 81(1A), 234(1), 234(4)(a), 67(3), 62, 63, 108A, 109, 110, 117A, 117B, 117C, 56, 62, 63, 642, 642(4), 2(19A); Securities and Exchange Board of India (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 ; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 - Regulations 3, 6, 2(zc), 2(p), 2(n), 4(2), 5(1), 6, 7, 16(1), 20(1), 25, 26, 36, 37, 46, 57; Securities and Exchange Board of India(SEBI) Act 1992 - Section 11C, 11A, 15Z, 55A, 68A, 77A, 80A, 108, 109, 110 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 206, 206A, 207, 59 to 81,; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, Form No. 2A,; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act(SCR), 1956 - Section 2(h), 21, 73(1)(3), 28, 28(1)(b), 20; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Section 55A, 67(3); Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 2(19B), 60B(9), 60B(1)(2)(3), ; Constitution of India - Articles 129, ; Companies Act, 2006 - Sections 755, 760,; Food Safety Modernization(FSMA), Act 2000 - Section 85; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Section 45I(f) ; Companies Amendment Act 53 of 2000 - Section 81(1A); Insurance Act, 1938 - Section 2; Securities Laws (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 13, 16, 28(1)(b), 28(2); Indian Evidence Act - Section 114 ; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, 4D; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Rules, 2003 - Rule 2,; UPC (PA) Amendment Rules 2011 ; SCR Rules - Rule 19; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Amendment Rules 2011

Reported in : (2013)1SCC1

a recognized stock exchange. Section 60B, as already indicated, refers to IM. Section 2(19B) was inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1.4.2003, which reads as follows:“2(19B) "information memorandum" means a process undertaken prior to the filing of a … for easy reference:“55A. Powers of Securities and Exchange Board of India.- The provisions contained in sections 55 to 58, 59 to 81, (including Sections 68A, 77A and 80A)108, 109, 110, 112, 113, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120,

Ranga Reddy District Sarpanches' Association and Ors. Vs. Government o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 1(1), 40, 226, 243E, 243G, 245, 246 and 246(3); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 153, 181, 249 and 250

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD1; 2004(1)ALT659

'the 1951 Act') was amended initially by an ordinance, later replaced by the Representation of the People (3rd Amendment) Act, 2002. Sections 33A and 33B were incorporated providing a right to information to the voter and obligating a candidate … the Supreme Court in PUCL and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr., : [2003]2SCR1136 , - the second Democratic Reforms case. The Supreme Court held the concept of freedom of speech and expression is not static. … few provisions that require no elaboration of the constitutional purpose. When Article 58 enacts that no person shall be eligible for election as President unless … reasons including absence of regular elections prolonged supersessions, insufficient representation of weaker sections like Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and women, inadequate devolution of powers and

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Vs. Amit Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Courts.4. It is stated that the recommendations of the Eradi Committee were accepted by the Government and Company (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 was passed providing for establishment of NCLT and NCLAT to take-over the functions which are being performed by … provides that the State Commission shall discharge the function of adjudicating ―the disputes between the licensees, and generating companies and to refer any dispute for arbitration‖. Therefore, any issue in relation to the PPA must be raised … of multiplicity of fora and a timely resolution of the insolvency process. 58 In Sudharshan Chits (I) Ltd. vs O Sukumaran Pillar52, a three judge … JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. They are: A The appeal B The genesis of

Arunachalam Muthu Vs. Nafan Bv and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … 1. The Appellant has filed the above Appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the Act”) impugning the order dated 31st May 2012 passed by the … Chittoor vs. Chittoor District Groundnut Traders Association and Ors. (1989) 2 SCC 58), Mr. Khambata has submitted that it is well settled that the powers

Masusmi Sa Investment Llc Vs. Keystone Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board [made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002] may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … by a common order. FACTS IN COMPANY APPEAL (L) NO. 47 OF 2012: 2. By this appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, the appellant challenges the order dated 12th October, 2012 passed by the … Act, 1996”) and referred the parties to arbitration as contemplated under Article 58 of the Articles of Association and clause 20.4 contained in the agreement

Uttam Chand Kothari Vs. Gauri Shankar Jalan and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

been Incorporated In the provisions of Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code, byway of Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Act, 2002, which came into force on 1-7-2002. Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code reads as follows:VI 17. Amendment … 12-5-1999. The plaintiffs, then, examined their first witness on 1-9-2001 and their second witness was examined on 30-11-2004. Without, however, cross-examining these two witnesses, the … are by far the best proof of the facts admitted. Admissions in pleadings or judicial admissions, admissible under Section 58 of the Evidence Act, made by the parties or their agents at or before the hearing of the

Shri Vishram Jaya Shetkar Alias Manohar Jaya Shetkar and Others Vs. Sh ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Civil Procedure by virtue of section 5 r/w section 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002? 11. Mr. D. J. Pangam, learned Advocate, argued on behalf of the plaintiffs whereas, Mr. Galileo Teles, learned … This Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 30/4/2003 passed by … be brought on record during the course of cross examination of defendant's witness? 2) Whether in terms of Section 58 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the admissions made by parties during the hearing/trial can be accepted as

C.Mangala Vijayalakshmi vs K.S.Kasimaris

Court : Chennai

‘Any person aggrieved by any decisionor order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … CKJ) Prayer in O.S.A.No.430 & 431 of 2001: Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent read with Section 483 of Companies Act 1/1956 to set aside the order passed in C.P.Nos.274, 199 of 1998 dated 19.10.2001 … Babu 50.Ms.Malleswari Nayagam 51.Mr.P.Raju 52.Mr.R.S.Soundar Rajan 53.Ms.S.Annalakshmi Jansi 54.Mr.R.Munusamy 55.Ms.P.Valliammal 56.Mr.R.Arunachalam 57.Mr.J.Karunakaran 58.Mr.M.Akbar Basha 59.Thirugnanam Mothilal 60.P.Sathyapriya 61.M.Nandinidevi 62.M.Deepa Sundaram (RR59 to 62 brought on

Pawan Goel Vs. Kmg Milk Food Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CompanyLimitation

Reported in : [2008]142CompCas441(P& H); (2008)2CompLJ213(P& H); (2008)149PLR98; [2009]89SCL121(Punj& Har)

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board (made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002) may file an appeal to the High Court within 60 days from the date of communication of the … 17, 2007 and withdrawn on April 16, 2007. This period comes to 58 days.6. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, advocate, appearing on behalf of respondents Nos. 1 … of filing the appeal, an application (C. M. No. 109 of 2007) was filed by the appellant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay of 140 days in preferring the appeal against

Brunton Developers vs United Breweries (Holdings) Limited (in Liquidat ...

Court : Karnataka

recovery of any tax or impost or any dues payable to the Government.1. Substituted by the Companies (SecondAmendment) Act, 2002 (w.e.f. a date yet to be notified). Prior to its substitution, section 537 read as under: "537. Avoidance … the declaration that the sale deed is void. The period of limitation - 10 -for seeking declaration under Section 58 of the Limitation Act is 3 years, and the same period applies for seeking cancellation. When that is