Advanced Search Results

Variety Entertainment (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : AIR2008Ori172

under Order 43, Rule1 of C.P.C., - Held, After introduction of Section 110A in the C.P.C., by 2002 Amendment Act, no Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable against judgment/order/decree passed by a Single Judge of a High Court. A … distribution companies which are in charge of electrical supports/assets in their control and further that, in terms of Section 51 of the Electricity Act, 2003 the distribution companies have the mandate to optimally utilize their assets in order … already has subsisting agreements and, therefore, there is no possibility of a second operator using the poles for the purpose of cable network business.30. Learned

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Chapters 1-B and 1-C of the Companies Act, 6 (2010) 11 SCC112 PART A1956as inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act 2002 which provided for the constitution of a National Company Law Tribunal7 and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal8 … with the provisions of Section 11-B. This is for the reason that 51 (1997) 5 SCC536122 the power under Article 226 has to be exercised … demonstrate an apparent disparity in 96 age of superannuation of Members and Chairpersons/Presiding Officers of different Tribunals. Illustratively, Section 14D of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 provides a Member of Telecom Disputes Settlement and

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

take note of 3 developments that have taken place, one in the year 2002 in the form of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the second in the same year 2002 in the form of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, … High Court went to the extent of holding that in the light of Section 35 of the Securitisation Act, 2002, Section 22 of SICA does not survive anymore. (vi) In Nabha Industries Ltd vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation … In Paschim Petrochem Ltd vs. Authorised Officer, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd {(2010) 51 GLR 1075}, a learned Judge of the Gujarat High Court held, while

Arunachalam Muthu Vs. Nafan Bv and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … 1. The Appellant has filed the above Appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the Act”) impugning the order dated 31st May 2012 passed by the … which expressly conferred the power of constitution of Benches upon the President. 51. Even if we proceed on the basis that the Chairman of the

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Vs. Amit Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Courts.4. It is stated that the recommendations of the Eradi Committee were accepted by the Government and Company (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 was passed providing for establishment of NCLT and NCLAT to take-over the functions which are being performed by … provides that the State Commission shall discharge the function of adjudicating ―the disputes between the licensees, and generating companies and to refer any dispute for arbitration‖. Therefore, any issue in relation to the PPA must be raised … to” is an expression of expansion and not of contraction.” (emphasis supplied) 51 While the phrases ―arising out of‖‖ and ―relating to‖ have been given … JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. They are: A The appeal B The genesis of

Bar Council of India Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 22-A, 22-B, 22-C, 22-D, 22-E, 22-E(1), 22-C(8); Legal Services Authorities (Amendment) Act, 2002, 227Constitution of India - Articles 226

the matters wherein the constitutional validity of Parts I-B and I-C of the Companies Act, 1956 inserted by Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 providing for the Constitution of National Company Law Tribunal and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal was under challenge. … this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has raised challenge to the vires of Sections 22-A, 22-B, 22-C, 22-D and 22-E of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (for short, ‘1987 Act’) as

The State Of Telangana Vs. M/s Tirumala Constructions

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

the State legislature approving the terms of the ordinance in Telangana and embodying it in terms of the second amendment which was brought into force on 02.12.2017, its terms related back. Therefore, the State power to legislate has … urged, on behalf of the Maharashtra state that the amendment to Section 26 of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (hereafter as “MVAT Act”) requiring a pre-deposit is not inconsistent with the Amendment. It is procedural in nature … are aggrieved by the judgments of Bombay High Court. I. Background and relevant provisions 2. The Constitution (101st Amendment) Act, 2016, (hereafter referred to as “the Amendment”) introduces a fundamental re-ordering of the constitutional premise of taxation by … demand is in any case barred by limitation. 28 (1976) 1 SCR627 51. The intention behind Section 19 was to stipulate a timeframe for subsuming

M/S. Goutham Enterprises,represented by Vs. M/S. Icatch Communications ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

inability to pay its debts are: (i) that the company is indebted in a sum exceeding Rs.500/ (The Companies Second (Amendment) Act, 2002, enhancing the amount from Rs.500/- to Rs.1 lakh has not been notified); and that despite service of notice … Director is always entitled to represent the company and such acts are recognized as legal and valid under Section 290 of the Act. Moreover, as noted hereinbefore in State Bank of Travancore (1-supra), the objection was relating

Vijay Kumar Karwa Vs. Official Liquidator, Rohtas Inds. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 483; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : AIR2008SC1613; 2008(3)ALLMR(SC)431; [2008]142CompCas438(SC); (2008)2CompLJ28(SC); JT2008(3)SC325; (2008)3MLJ941(SC); (2008)5MysLJ(SC)775; 2008(3)SCALE311; (2008)4SCC222; 2008AIRSCW1791; 2008(2)Supreme213; 2008(4)KCCRSN257

reads as follows:483. Appeals from orders.-Appeals from any order made, or decision given before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, in the matter of the winding up of a company by the Court shall lie to the same … the Patna High Court summarily dismissing the Company Appeal No. 4 of 2006 filed by the appellant under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956 (in short 'the Act').3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:Company

Purnima Manthena and Anr. Vs. Dr. Renuka Datla and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board [made before the commencement of the companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002]. may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … Pradesh, in Company Appeal No.17 of 2014 preferred by the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 herein, under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short hereinafter to be referred to as “the Act”) assailing the