Advanced Search Results

Sumitomo Corporation Vs. Cdc Financial Services (Mauritius) Ltd. and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 10(1), 10F, 397, 398, 399 and 402; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 8, 37, 44, 45, 47, 47(2), 48 and 50; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16 to 20

Reported in : AIR2008SC1594; 2008(1)ARBLR452(SC); (2008)1CompLJ393(SC); JT2008(3)SC32; 2008(4)MhLj31; 2008(3)SCALE92; (2008)4SCC91; [2008]82SCL495(SC); 2008AIRSCW1766; MANU/SC/1101/2008

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … an action in a matter in respect of which the parties have made an agreement referred to in Section 44, shall, at the request of one of the parties or any person claiming through or under him, refer

Arunachalam Muthu Vs. Nafan Bv and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … 1. The Appellant has filed the above Appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the Act”) impugning the order dated 31st May 2012 passed by the … 275 of 2012 moved by the Appellant under Regulation 4 and Regulation 44 of the Company Law Board Regulations, 1991 (“the CLB Regulations”). The said

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

take note of 3 developments that have taken place, one in the year 2002 in the form of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the second in the same year 2002 in the form of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, … High Court went to the extent of holding that in the light of Section 35 of the Securitisation Act, 2002, Section 22 of SICA does not survive anymore. (vi) In Nabha Industries Ltd vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation

Masusmi Sa Investment Llc Vs. Keystone Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board [made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002] may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … an action in a matter in respect of which the parties have made an agreement referred to in section 44, shall, at the request of one of the parties or any person claiming through or under him, refer

New Bridge Holdings B.V. Vs. Ttk-lig Limited and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act - Section 406; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 10; Land Revenue Act - Section 40; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 195(1)(b); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39 Rule 2(3)

gain. [Provided that the provisions of this section shall not apply on and after the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002.]” 11. Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 confers a power on the High Court to … also averred that alleging disobedience, the petitioner filed C.A.No.113 of 2011 before the Company Law Board under Regulations 44 and 47 of the Company Law Board Regulations read with Section 406 of the Companies Act. By order

M/S United Breweries (Holdings) Limited vs Offilical Liquidator

Court : Karnataka

filed, the provision relevant for that purpose was Section 391(7) of the Act. Although in terms of the Companies (Second Amendment Act) 2002 (‘2002 Amendment’), Section 391(7) stood omitted, the said amendment was to take effect only from date notified by … SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI.MRINAL SHANKAR SRI.DHARMA TEJ KONERU, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R4-R6) THIS APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 446 (2) (a) &(b) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 R/W RULES 6 AND 9 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES,

Vivek Hire Purchase and Leasing Limited Rep. by Its Vice President, Mr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434

Reported in : [2006]129CompCas343(Mad); 2005(1)CTC524; (2005)2MLJ8; [2005]62SCL245(Mad)

to whom the company is indebted in a sum exceeding rupees one lakh (substituted for Rs. 500 by Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002) then due, has served on the company, by, causing it to be delivered at its registered office, by … entitled to seize the assets and the same is pending. On 22.6.2002, the petitioner issued a notice under Section 434 of the Companies Act, calling upon the petitioner to pay the sum of Rs. 9,46,503 due as … respondent surrendered 2 laptops to the petitioner. The petitioner also paid Rs. 44,082 payable by the respondent to VSNL, as requested by the respondent company,

C.Mangala Vijayalakshmi vs K.S.Kasimaris

Court : Chennai

‘Any person aggrieved by any decisionor order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … CKJ) Prayer in O.S.A.No.430 & 431 of 2001: Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent read with Section 483 of Companies Act 1/1956 to set aside the order passed in C.P.Nos.274, 199 of 1998 dated 19.10.2001 … 36.Mr.P.Palanivel 37.Ms.M.K.Devi38.Mr.K.Kapil Dev 39.Ms.Anitha Lakshmi 40.Mr.Surya Pratap Reddy 41.Ms.Manoja Lakshmi 42.Mr.N.Jayachandran 43.Ms.E.Latha 44.Mr.J.Elumalai 45.Mr.S.Ramakrishnan 46.Ms.Vijaya Sudha 47.Mr.G.Satyanarayana 48.Mrs.R.Sharada 49.Mr.P.Rajendra Prasad Babu 50.Ms.Malleswari Nayagam 51.Mr.P.Raju 52.Mr.R.S.Soundar

Bayer Corporation Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

rights.” 20. Significantly the text of section107A of the Act, as introduced by section 44 of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, was materially different from the one proposed under the 1999 Bill. The said section as brought in force … rights conferred by a patent. The safe harbor exception was first contemplated under clause 51 of the Patents (Second Amendment) Bill, 1999, which provided for introduction of Section 107A in the Act. Section 107A as proposed under the … is commonly known as “Bolar Exemption”. The use of patented inventions by companies to make generic versions for submission to the Food and Drug Administration

Vijay Sekhri and Another Vs M/S. Tinna Oils and Chemicals and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Companies Act

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F , 50 ; Arbitration Act - 8 ; 45

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board 2[made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002] may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … an action in a matter in respect of which the parties have made an agreement referred to in Section 44, shall, at the request of one of the parties or any person claiming through or under him, refer