Advanced Search Results

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

take note of 3 developments that have taken place, one in the year 2002 in the form of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the second in the same year 2002 in the form of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, … (Regulation) Act, 1956, and (iii) The Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. It is, by virtue of Section 41 of the Securitisation Act, 2002, read with the Schedule thereto that two provisos were inserted under the already … High Court went to the extent of holding that in the light of Section 35 of the Securitisation Act, 2002, Section 22 of SICA does not survive anymore. (vi) In Nabha Industries Ltd vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation

M/S. Uniword Telecom Ltd. and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Education

law for the time being in force or any instrument having effect by virtue of any such law." Section 41 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 provides for amendment in certain enactments as specified in the schedule. Section 41 … the Bank under Section 13(4) of the Act, 2002 has filed the second writ petition. We have heard Shri R.Venkatramani, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by … writ petitions are: The petitioner no.1 is a registered company under the Companies Act, 1956, and has been carrying out its activities since 1995. The … dated 01/8/2012, under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter called the "Act, 2002") to the petitioners to discharge in full all liabilities to the consortium of

Arcelormittal India Private Limited Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

provisions of Sections 15 to 21 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Interestingly, the Companies Amendment Act, 2002 omitted a provision similar to Section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Consequently, creditors … and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2017, together with the amendment made by the Insolvency and 40 Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2018. Section 29A, as introduced by the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance, 2017, on 23.11.2017, reads as … a corporate debtor under insolvency resolution process or liquidation under this Code; 41 (i) Where any connected person in respect of such person meets any

Vivek Hire Purchase and Leasing Limited Rep. by Its Vice President, Mr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434

Reported in : [2006]129CompCas343(Mad); 2005(1)CTC524; (2005)2MLJ8; [2005]62SCL245(Mad)

to whom the company is indebted in a sum exceeding rupees one lakh (substituted for Rs. 500 by Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002) then due, has served on the company, by, causing it to be delivered at its registered office, by … entitled to seize the assets and the same is pending. On 22.6.2002, the petitioner issued a notice under Section 434 of the Companies Act, calling upon the petitioner to pay the sum of Rs. 9,46,503 due as

New Bridge Holdings B.V. Vs. Ttk-lig Limited and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act - Section 406; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 10; Land Revenue Act - Section 40; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 195(1)(b); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39 Rule 2(3)

gain. [Provided that the provisions of this section shall not apply on and after the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002.]” 11. Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 confers a power on the High Court to … before the Allahabad High Court. In the judgment in Satdeo Pandey v. Baba Raghav Das, AIR 1953 All. 419, the question was considered by a Division Bench and as there was a difference of opinion on the

C.Mangala Vijayalakshmi vs K.S.Kasimaris

Court : Chennai

‘Any person aggrieved by any decisionor order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … CKJ) Prayer in O.S.A.No.430 & 431 of 2001: Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent read with Section 483 of Companies Act 1/1956 to set aside the order passed in C.P.Nos.274, 199 of 1998 dated 19.10.2001 … 32.Ms.A.Anuradha 33.Ms.G.Leelavathi 34.Mr.K.Karthikeyan 35.Ms.P.Chandra 36.Mr.P.Palanivel 37.Ms.M.K.Devi38.Mr.K.Kapil Dev 39.Ms.Anitha Lakshmi 40.Mr.Surya Pratap Reddy 41.Ms.Manoja Lakshmi 42.Mr.N.Jayachandran 43.Ms.E.Latha 44.Mr.J.Elumalai 45.Mr.S.Ramakrishnan 46.Ms.Vijaya Sudha 47.Mr.G.Satyanarayana 48.Mrs.R.Sharada 49.Mr.P.Rajendra Prasad Babu

M/s. Raj Shipping and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through th ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Miscellaneous

purchase order/nomination of the same quantity on any of the Oil Marketing Companies such as M/s. Indian Oil Company Ltd., M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, … recovery notices impugned therein were passed without assessment; second, that the sales of High Speed Diesel are … be acquired â? (Emphasis Supplied) 50.2) Further, Article 366(30) defines a â˜Union territoryâ™ (as introduced by Seventh Constitution Amendment Act, 1956) as follows: âUnion territory means any Union territory specified in the First Schedule and includes any other … Petition are within the State of Maharashtra so as to be taxable under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (for short âthe MVAT Actâ?) and therefore the action of the Respondents treating it as such can be … the MVAT Act. 18. The Respondent No. 1 has issued Notification No.VAT.1506/ CR-135-B/Taxation-1 dated 30.11.2006 in terms of Section 41(4)(b) of the MVAT Act, 2002 exempting the sales of motor spirit made at the retail outlet. Accordingly, the

Shri Vijay Kumar Narang, Smt Neeta Vs. Prakash Coach Builders Private

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2005)128CompCas976

that it was to increase the paid up capital in statutory compliance of the provisions of the Companies Amendment Act, 2000. Further more, the Company was in need of funds and therefore, offered to allot shares at a … the petitioners. All the earlier proceedings before the various Courts/Forums, wherein the second respondent was a party establish the conduct of the respondent. The parties … had rejected the application of the petitioners on the ground that they did not fulfil the requirements of Section 41 of the Act. At the same time the Company had allotted on 13.12.2002, 1125 shares each to the

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

by this Court in State of U.P. vs. Sitapur Packing Wood Suppliers, 2002 (4) SCC 566. The Court upheld the 2004 Amendment. The High Court … writ petitioners for quashing the levy of transit fee were allowed. The second group of appeals consists of appeals filed by the State of U.P. … Pradesh, State of Uttarakhand and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different … occasion to consider a pre­constitutional law, i.e., Travancore­Cochin High Court Act in the context of Code of Civil Procedure(Amendment) Act, 1976. In the above case an earlier judgment of this Court, namely, Kulwant Kaur and 79 others vs.

M/S. Svpcllimited,d. No.11-13-173/11and12 Vs. The State Bank ofindia a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

its Schedule (Act 54 of 2002) provide for amendment of SICA, by insertion of the second and … be taken on 28.03.2014, as violative of the provisions of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (for short SICA).The petitioner was initially constituted as … that the order passed by the DRAT on 17.06.2011 contravened the fiRs.and second provisos to Section 18(1) of the SARFAESI Act. Three weeks, after granting … notice issued under the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (Act 54 of 2002).(for short the SARFAESI Act).and the notice of the Advocate Commissioner dated 21.03.2014 intimating that … requesting for grant of further time on the ground that the matter was pending before the BIFR; by Section 41 of the SARFAESI Act, and its Schedule, Section 15(1) of SICA was amended by insertion of the 2nd