Advanced Search Results

Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Others. Vs. Securitie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Companies

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 55A(b), 55A(c), 56, 57, 58, 60B, 60B(1), (2), 2(19A), 60B(9), 235 to 241, 73, 73(1)(2A), 209-A , 68A(1)(a), 2(45AA), 81(1A), 234(1), 234(4)(a), 67(3), 62, 63, 108A, 109, 110, 117A, 117B, 117C, 56, 62, 63, 642, 642(4), 2(19A); Securities and Exchange Board of India (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 ; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 - Regulations 3, 6, 2(zc), 2(p), 2(n), 4(2), 5(1), 6, 7, 16(1), 20(1), 25, 26, 36, 37, 46, 57; Securities and Exchange Board of India(SEBI) Act 1992 - Section 11C, 11A, 15Z, 55A, 68A, 77A, 80A, 108, 109, 110 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 206, 206A, 207, 59 to 81,; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, Form No. 2A,; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act(SCR), 1956 - Section 2(h), 21, 73(1)(3), 28, 28(1)(b), 20; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Section 55A, 67(3); Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 2(19B), 60B(9), 60B(1)(2)(3), ; Constitution of India - Articles 129, ; Companies Act, 2006 - Sections 755, 760,; Food Safety Modernization(FSMA), Act 2000 - Section 85; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Section 45I(f) ; Companies Amendment Act 53 of 2000 - Section 81(1A); Insurance Act, 1938 - Section 2; Securities Laws (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 13, 16, 28(1)(b), 28(2); Indian Evidence Act - Section 114 ; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, 4D; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Rules, 2003 - Rule 2,; UPC (PA) Amendment Rules 2011 ; SCR Rules - Rule 19; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Amendment Rules 2011

Reported in : (2013)1SCC1

a recognized stock exchange. Section 60B, as already indicated, refers to IM. Section 2(19B) was inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1.4.2003, which reads as follows:“2(19B) "information memorandum" means a process undertaken prior to the filing of a … read, clearly spells out the powers of SEBI and the Central Government. Tribunal also considered the scope of Section 28(1)(b) of the SCR Act and held that the exclusion in the said Act is not available to OFCDs

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

take note of 3 developments that have taken place, one in the year 2002 in the form of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the second in the same year 2002 in the form of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, … High Court went to the extent of holding that in the light of Section 35 of the Securitisation Act, 2002, Section 22 of SICA does not survive anymore. (vi) In Nabha Industries Ltd vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation … but the same was set aside by the Appellate Authority (AAIFR), on 28.4.2000 and the case was remanded back to BIFR. (iv) By a fresh

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

1B and 1C of the Companies Act, 1956. These parts were inserted into the Companies Act, by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002. Thereby, provision was made for the constitution of the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law … Constitution and bar of the jurisdiction of the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 as contained in Section 28 of the Act cannot be sustained; [pic].(2) Even if the bar of jurisdiction is upheld, the Tribunal being

Arunachalam Muthu Vs. Nafan Bv and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … 1. The Appellant has filed the above Appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the Act”) impugning the order dated 31st May 2012 passed by the … the CLB Regulations, which is 1 KPP -9- Company Appeal (L) No. 28 of 2012 the inherent power of the CLB. The exercise or refusal

Anju Timblo, Managing Director of Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Company

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board [made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002] may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … respondents. 4. Heard finally with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. 5. These appeals under Section 10F of Companies Act, 1956 (the Act, for short) arise out of the order dated 18/05/2015, passed by … in a Company Petition. The point is accordingly answered in the affirmative. 28. POINT NOS. 2 AND 3 :- The main thrust of the challenge

Santosh Maize Through Its Manager Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu Represen ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

1970 dated 14th March, 1970 4 The TNGST (Amendment) Act, 1993 (Act No.24 of 1993) 5 The TNGST (Second Amendment) Act, 1996 (Act No.37 of 1996) 2 (“Taxation Entry No.61”, hereafter) and the tax rate was reduced to 4% … the appellant is entitled to exemption from tax on maize starch in accordance with 15 The TNGST (Fourth Amendment) Act, 2002 9 Exemption Entry No.8, Mr. Mani prayed that the orders under challenge be set aside by declaring the … subsequent developments - the latter being crucial for the present purpose. Firstly, Section 28-A was inserted w.e.f. 6th November, 1997 by way of an amendment7

S. Pattabhiraman Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 43A, 159, 160, 161, 162, 166, 167, 167(1), 168, 169, 220, 220(1), 220(2), 220(3), 222, 397, 398, 610, 621A(1), 633, 633(1) and 633(2); Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : [2009]148CompCas705(Mad); [2009]96SCL305(Mad)

a mandatory duty cast on every company. Under Section 167 of the Companies Act, as amended by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 See [2003] 113 Comp Cas 201, the Central Government on the application of any of the members of

E.Bapanaiah Vs. K.S.Raju Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contempt of Court

as under:- “Provided that the provision of this section shall not apply on and after commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002.” As such, on the date (3.8.2007) order passed by learned single Judge, the depositor had no option of … lakhs) each for a period of 45 months on 20.7.1997 and was due for repayment on maturity on 28.4.2001. However, when the NFL failed to re-pay the sum to the depositors, an application (CP No.35 of 2000)

Md.MoiuudIn Vs. Most.Haliman Nisa and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contempt of Court

as under:- “Provided that the provision of this section shall not apply on and after commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002.” As such, on the date (3.8.2007) order passed by learned single Judge, the depositor had no option of … lakhs) each for a period of 45 months on 20.7.1997 and was due for repayment on maturity on 28.4.2001. However, when the NFL failed to re-pay the sum to the depositors, an application (CP No.35 of 2000)

Bank of Maharashtra Vs. Pandurang Keshav Gorwardkar and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

framed the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993. 37. The Companies Act has undergone substantial amendments by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act 2002 (11 of 2003) but no notification has been issued so far bringing Act 11 of 2003 into effect. … that Section which includes attachment and sale of the movable or immovable property/properties of the certificate debtor. Under Section 28, the Recovery Officer may recover the amount of debt under the certificate by one or more of the