Advanced Search Results

Smt. Hetal Alpesh Muchhala Vs. Adityesh Educational Institute and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ArbitrationCompany

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 33, 34 and 34(3); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35 and 35(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10E(4C), 10E(4D), 10F, 397 and 398; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1963; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1974; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 252; Evidence Act; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2)

Reported in : [2009]152CompCas75(Bom)

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board (made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002) may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … company application, the applicant/appellant seeks condonation of delay of 105 days in lodging the company appeal filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956. The question which arises for determination in this application is whether the … Alpesh Muchhala v. Adityesh Educational Institute P. Ltd. [2009] 149 Comp Cas 241), was received by the applicant on February 16, 2009. However, the company

Raghunath Rai Bareja and anr. Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : BankingLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 136; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446, 446(1) and 446(3); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18, 19, 24, 31, 31(1) and 34; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 34, Rule 11; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9, 10 and 117; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(2)ALT114(SC); 2007(1)AWC507(SC); [2007]135CompCas163(SC); (2007)1CompLJ108(SC); 2007(5)CTC642; 2007(3)MhLj83; 2007MPLJ306(SC); 2006(13)SCALE511; (2007)2SCC230; 2006AIRSCW6446

16. In this connection, it may be mentioned that Section 446(3) of the Companies Act was omitted by Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 and evidently the High Court has overlooked this Amendment. As a result in our opinion the High Court … adjudication and execution is a procedure clearly inconsistent with realization of these debts in any other manner. Since Section 24 of the RDB Act applies the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963, to applications filed before the Tribunal,

Duroflex Ltd. Vs. Johnny Mathew

Court : Kerala

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 10, 10E(1), (1A), (4B) to (4D), 10F, 18, 111, 111(1), 111(2), 111(3), 111(4), 111(5), 111(7), 111(10), 113(4), 155 and 155(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29(2) and 137 - Article 137; Maharashtra Rent Control Act - Sections 18; Telangana Area Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 8A; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Securities Act, 1992; Special Court Act - Sections 9A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 196; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21

Reported in : (2008)2CompLJ314(Ker); [2007]75SCL569(Ker)

exercise and discharge such powers and functions as may be conferred on it before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 by or under this Act or any other law, and shall also exercise and discharge such other powers … An application (appeal) was filed by the first respondent before the Company Law Board, South Region Bench under Section 111(2) of the Companies Act (for short 'the Act') as the company refused to register the transaction of … computation of the period of limitation are contained in Sections 12 to 24 included in Part. III of the Limitation Act, 1963. Section 5 is

Mineria Nacional Limitada, a Partnership Firm and Shri Anil Vasudeva S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CompanyLimitation

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 4(2), 10F, 10(3), 10(12), 13, 14 and 260A; Companies(Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24, 29(2), 34 and 34(2); Uttar Pradesh Sales-Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3B and 10; Sales Tax Act - Sections 10 and 10(3B); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A; Special Court(Trial of Offences Relating to transactions in Securities) Act, 1992; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 43

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR789

aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies(Second Amendment Act, 2002) may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … 2. The applicant has filed an application dated 16-1-2006 for condonation of delay to file an appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act, for short) against the Order dated 26-9-2005 of the Company Law … filed before the Delhi High Court on 18-10-2005, being Company Appeal No. 24/2005 and that when the matter came up for hearing before the Delhi

Mohd. Riyazur Rehman Siddiqui Vs. Deputy Director of Health Services

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 110, 110C, 140, 163A, 165 to 174, 175 and 176; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10F, 397, 398 and 483; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 71, 107 and 108; Specific Relief Act - Sections 6 and 6(3); Contempt of Courts Act - Sections 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Limitation Act - Sections 4 to 24; Defence of India Act; General Clauses Act, 1897; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 127(1), 217, 217(1), 218D and 218D(1); Kerala High Court Act - Sections 5; Indian Succession Act - Sections

Reported in : 2009ACJ585; 2008(6)MhLj941

under:483. Appeals from orders - Appeals from any order made or decision given before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, in the matter of the winding up of a company by the Court shall lie to the same … the Tribunal constituted under the M.V. Act is a Court subordinate to the High Court in terms of Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, The Karnataka High Court in Mrs. Noreen R. Srikantaiah v. L. Dasarath

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

take note of 3 developments that have taken place, one in the year 2002 in the form of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the second in the same year 2002 in the form of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, … High Court went to the extent of holding that in the light of Section 35 of the Securitisation Act, 2002, Section 22 of SICA does not survive anymore. (vi) In Nabha Industries Ltd vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation … the decision in Noble Aqua, the Bombay High Court rejected in paragraph 24 of its decision, the contention that the expression "reference" is referable only

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

1B and 1C of the Companies Act, 1956. These parts were inserted into the Companies Act, by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002. Thereby, provision was made for the constitution of the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law … issue adjudicated upon, pertained to the constitutional validity of the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, and more particularly, Sections 4 and 55 thereof, whereby Articles 31C and 368 of the Constitution, came to be amended. The majority … 1981 filed in this Court and Transferred Cases Nos. 2, 6 and 24 of 1981 were listed to be heard along with the present batch

Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Others. Vs. Securitie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Companies

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 55A(b), 55A(c), 56, 57, 58, 60B, 60B(1), (2), 2(19A), 60B(9), 235 to 241, 73, 73(1)(2A), 209-A , 68A(1)(a), 2(45AA), 81(1A), 234(1), 234(4)(a), 67(3), 62, 63, 108A, 109, 110, 117A, 117B, 117C, 56, 62, 63, 642, 642(4), 2(19A); Securities and Exchange Board of India (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 ; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 - Regulations 3, 6, 2(zc), 2(p), 2(n), 4(2), 5(1), 6, 7, 16(1), 20(1), 25, 26, 36, 37, 46, 57; Securities and Exchange Board of India(SEBI) Act 1992 - Section 11C, 11A, 15Z, 55A, 68A, 77A, 80A, 108, 109, 110 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 206, 206A, 207, 59 to 81,; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, Form No. 2A,; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act(SCR), 1956 - Section 2(h), 21, 73(1)(3), 28, 28(1)(b), 20; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Section 55A, 67(3); Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 2(19B), 60B(9), 60B(1)(2)(3), ; Constitution of India - Articles 129, ; Companies Act, 2006 - Sections 755, 760,; Food Safety Modernization(FSMA), Act 2000 - Section 85; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Section 45I(f) ; Companies Amendment Act 53 of 2000 - Section 81(1A); Insurance Act, 1938 - Section 2; Securities Laws (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 13, 16, 28(1)(b), 28(2); Indian Evidence Act - Section 114 ; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, 4D; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Rules, 2003 - Rule 2,; UPC (PA) Amendment Rules 2011 ; SCR Rules - Rule 19; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Amendment Rules 2011

Reported in : (2013)1SCC1

a recognized stock exchange. Section 60B, as already indicated, refers to IM. Section 2(19B) was inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1.4.2003, which reads as follows:“2(19B) "information memorandum" means a process undertaken prior to the filing of a … prospectus as required under Section 60B(9) of the Companies Act.14. SEBI, in the meanwhile, issued a notice dated 24.11.2010 informing both SIRECL and SHICL that the issuance of OFCDs was a public issue and, therefore, securities were

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

powers relating to winding up vested in the High Courts. The Government accepted the recommendations and passed the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002. The reason for the said amendment was to avoid multiplicity of litigation before various fora and to reduce … particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing.” 28 | Pa ge 24. Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary were adopted by the … JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.1. The Madras Bar Association has filed this Writ Petition seeking a declaration that Sections 12 and 13 of the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021 and Sections 184 and

M/S United Breweries (Holdings) Limited vs Offilical Liquidator

Court : Karnataka

filed, the provision relevant for that purpose was Section 391(7) of the Act. Although in terms of the Companies (Second Amendment Act) 2002 (‘2002 Amendment’), Section 391(7) stood omitted, the said amendment was to take effect only from date notified by … UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT. 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 12TH FLOOR, UB TOWER, LEVEL 12 UB CITY, 24, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD BANGALORE-560 0012. IAE INTERNATIONAL AERO ENGINES AG, HOMBURGER AG, PRIME TOWER, HARSTRASSE 201, CH 8005