Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: companies second amendment act 2002 section 134 · Page 1 of about 233 results (0.059 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 07 2014

E.Bapanaiah Vs. K.S.Raju Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-07-2014

Subject : Contempt of Court

as under:- “Provided that the provision of this section shall not apply on and after commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002.” As such, on the date (3.8.2007) order passed by learned single Judge, the depositor had no option of … opportunity to defend themselves before the conviction was recorded by the learned Single Judge in its concluding paragraph 134 of the judgment in the aforementioned Contempt Case No.915 of 2002.4. It is only in respect of conviction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2014

Md.MoiuudIn Vs. Most.Haliman Nisa and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-07-2014

Subject : Contempt of Court

as under:- “Provided that the provision of this section shall not apply on and after commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002.” As such, on the date (3.8.2007) order passed by learned single Judge, the depositor had no option of … opportunity to defend themselves before the conviction was recorded by the learned Single Judge in its concluding paragraph 134 of the judgment in the aforementioned Contempt Case No.915 of 2002.4. It is only in respect of conviction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 2010

S.P.M. Employees Union and Others. Vs. Union of India and Others.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Decided on : Oct-13-2010

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Section 23 ; Indian Coinage Act, 1906 - Sections 6, 6(2) ;

The said Company has been incorporated as fully owned Government company with limited liability by shares under the Companies Act, 1956, with its registered and corporate office in New Delhi. By another office memorandum (annexure P/2) of … to as "the Act") impugning the judgment dated 14.8.2007 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Lucknow rejecting the second appeal of the appellant/assessee. The interest charge on the tax could not have been charged under Section 8(1) … has drawn our attention to the statement of object and reasons of amendment incorporated in the Coinage Act, 1906, by way of amending Act No.33 … the Supreme Court in Balco employees Union v. Union of India, AIR 2002 SC 350, Prasar Bharti v. Amarjeet Singh and Others, AIR 2007 SC … Mathur v. Union of India, (1998) 4 SCC 134 to contend that printing of bank note is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 05 2011

Ms Aarti Sponge and Power Vs. Bimal Kumar and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Dec-05-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board [made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002] may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … (APPEAL UNDER SECTION 10-F OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956) Dr. I.M. QUDDUSI, J, 1. The instant appeal has been filed u/s … out was subject to certain conditions. By way of Company Applications No. 134/10 and 178/10 the respondents have sought setting aside of the valuation done

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 2009

Raj Kumar Bansal and ors. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-21-2009

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 9; Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 405, 406 and 498A

Reported in : 164(2009)DLT508

husband. This Section had been incorporated pursuant to an amendment in the Indian Penal Code by Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act 1983 w.e.f. 25th December, 1983. The object of this provision was to prevent torture to a woman by … Surjit Kaur Chopra v. State and Anr. 144 (2007) DLT 483iii. Desh Depak Kapoor v. State (Delhi Administration) 134 (2006) DLT 246 (DB)iv. Suraj Prakash v. State of Delhi 135 (2006) DLT 135v. Surender Kumar and Anr.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2008

One Stop Airline Mro Support Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Decided on : Jan-21-2008

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)(126)ECC216

For BMR and Associates, Sujit Ghosh, D.K. Ranaand and Sudipta Bhattacharjee, Advs., Stephan Lorenzen, MD, One Stop Airline Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act - Section 3(1) Customs Act - Section 25(1); Central Excise Act - Section … included in raw materials." (Reference is made to the Statement on the amendments to Schedule-VI to the Companies Act, 1956). In the same book, another … Duty under Entry No. 348 of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated March 1, 2002 (as amended) Held, it is only the basic material that is associated … maintenance/repair of aircraft or its engine but it is undertaken by LHT - a foreign based company and secondly because a foreign airline does not come within the ambit of the expression scheduled air transport service or … 108; Indian Aircraft Rules - Rules 2(49), 30, 134(1) and 134(1)(1A); Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2021

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

particularly on two grounds - (i) violation of the constitution; and (ii) violation of the enabling act. The second ground includes not only cases of violation of substantive provisions of the enabling act but also cases of … administrative orders or executive instructions without any statutory backing.14. It has been argued before us that formulation or amendment/ modification of a city’s Master Plan is not an administrative but a legislative exercise. Relying on the decisions … buildings or even buildings within Transfer Case (C) No.229 of 2020 Page 134 of 179 the listed streets/precincts etc. is required to invite suggestions/objections from … Authority of India and Others,20the dictum in Cynamide India Ltd. was followed. Section 11(4) of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997, it was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2014

Michael John Milne Vs. the Queen

Court : Australia High Court

Decided on : Feb-14-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

in a structure which would facilitate their sale to off-shore investors and defer liability to tax. Five off-shore companies were incorporated on 3 June 2004[17] and five entities known under Dutch law as "Stichtings"[18] were established on … dealing, the value of the property was $1,000,000 or more." 5. The second count, upon which the appellant was also convicted, alleged that on or … Code by Sched 1, item 1 of the Proceeds of Crime (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2002 (Cth). That Act replaced offences of money … into the Code by Sched 1, item 1 of the Proceeds of Crime (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2002 (Cth). That Act replaced offences of money laundering created by ss 81 and 82 of the Proceeds of … they stood between April 2004 and September 2005[8]. Section 400.3(1) provided: "A person is guilty of an … to Barat Advisory was that created by s 134.2 of the Code[11], namely obtaining a financial advantage

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2010

Sukh Dev Vs. Prakash Chandra

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-16-2010

Subject : Civil

but it is akin to appellate, revisional or corrective jurisdiction', in first part of para 29 itself, in second part of para 29, specifically held that 'judgments/orders passed by the Single Judge in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction … in any court of civil jurisdiction. The Explanation to that section inserted by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976, provides as follows:Explanation.- In this section, the expression 'proceedings' includes proceedings under Order IX, but does not … Lal Chand 2001 (1) WLC 129; Punjab National Bank v. Purewell : 2002 (1) WLC (Raj.) 67; Sher Singh Meena v. Chief Engineer 2004 (4) … Acharya who appeared as intervenors have argued that in view of Rule 134 (1) as amended by notification dated 28th June, 2005, the present intra-court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : MRTP

judicial review power under Article 226- in the wake of enactment of Article 324A (inserted by the forty second amendment to the Constitution) was permissible. The court held as follows: ―Though judicial review is a basic and essential … that have wide ranging repercussions, including prohibiting individuals and entities (i.e directors, companies etc) for specified periods from buying, selling or dealing in securities in … and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (Section 18); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (Section 34); Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (Section15) etc. This Court notices that firstly, the Act creates … and vital disclosures under this section: W.P.(C) 11467/2018 & connected matters Page 134 of 152 Provided also that the Commission may, if it is satisfied

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial