Advanced Search Results

Sharma Realty Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Vinod Muktinath Sharma

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board 2[made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002] may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … (the detailed description of the property is available at pages 122 and 123 of C.P.) The aforesaid order has been necessitated to safeguard the interest … construction for flats has commenced so far and the site plan is awaiting sanction from the authorities. 2 Section 10F reads as under: 10F. Appeals against the order of the Company Law Board. Any person aggrieved by

Ranga Reddy District Sarpanches' Association and Ors. Vs. Government o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 1(1), 40, 226, 243E, 243G, 245, 246 and 246(3); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 153, 181, 249 and 250

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD1; 2004(1)ALT659

'the 1951 Act') was amended initially by an ordinance, later replaced by the Representation of the People (3rd Amendment) Act, 2002. Sections 33A and 33B were incorporated providing a right to information to the voter and obligating a candidate … the Supreme Court in PUCL and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr., : [2003]2SCR1136 , - the second Democratic Reforms case. The Supreme Court held the concept of freedom of speech and expression is not static. … reasons including absence of regular elections prolonged supersessions, insufficient representation of weaker sections like Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and women, inadequate devolution of powers and … the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of the Parliament Article 123(2)(a); other provisions of the Constitution are not, and they are the ones

Eastwood and Another (Appellants) Vs. Magnox Electric Plc (Respondents ...

Court : House of Lords

Subject : Land Acquisition

Mr Williams is claiming in his court proceedings. There can be no justification for allowing Mr Williams a second bite of the cherry. In Mr Eastwood's case there has been no hearing in the employment tribunal. But … Collins, Claim for Unfair Dismissal, 2001, 30 ILJ 305; Professor Bob Hepple QC and Gillian Morris, The Employment Act 2002 and the Crisis of Individual Employment Rights, 2002, 31 ILJ 245, 253; Douglas Brodie, Legal Coherence and the … in response to the decision in Johnson's case Mr McCabe sought to amend his statement of claim by limiting the focus of his complaint to … employee has the right not to be unfairly dismissed by his employer: section 94. The remedies for unfair dismissal are set out in Chapter II … 1971 (the ultimate precursor of the current section 123(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996): ". .

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

powers relating to winding up vested in the High Courts. The Government accepted the recommendations and passed the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002. The reason for the said amendment was to avoid multiplicity of litigation before various fora and to reduce … ordinances which is the same as that of a legislative act. Article 123 of the Constitution empowers the President to promulgate an ordinance during recess … JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.1. The Madras Bar Association has filed this Writ Petition seeking a declaration that Sections 12 and 13 of the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021 and Sections 184 and

National Westminster Bank Plc (Respondents) Vs. Spectrum Plus Limited ...

Court : House of Lords

Subject : Land Acquisition

includes a floating charge within the meaning of section 462 of the Companies Act (Scottish floating charges)." Section 462(1) of the Companies Act 1985, which … was wrong and should be overruled. 2. The respondent bank had a second string to its bow. The bank contended that if the House considered … 1986, re-enacting a rule that was first introduced over 100 years ago by the Preferential Payments in Bankruptcy Amendment Act 1897, (60 and 61 Vict, c 19), provides that, so far as the assets of the company available … is unaffected by the changes in the classes of preferential creditors made by section 251 of the Enterprise Act 2002. 142. In my opinion Slade J did not, in Siebe Gorman, make any significant error in stating the … cases: Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234. It promotes the degree of certainty that is

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

take note of 3 developments that have taken place, one in the year 2002 in the form of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the second in the same year 2002 in the form of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, … High Court went to the extent of holding that in the light of Section 35 of the Securitisation Act, 2002, Section 22 of SICA does not survive anymore. (vi) In Nabha Industries Ltd vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation

Aligarh Muslim University versus Naresh Agarwal & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.1647

must point towards one member of the minority or a group from the community. [Para 135] 3.2. The second indicia is the purpose for which the educational institution was established - Though it is not necessary that … Studies - referred to. List of Acts Constitution of India; Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920; Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1951; Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1965; Entry 63 of List I of the Seventh Schedule to the … 1981, Section 4 1686 [2024] 11 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports 7. In 2002, an eleven-Judge Bench of this Court in TMA Pai Foundation v. State … S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports Government of India, Central Publication Branch (1929) pp. 123, available at https://archive.org/details/dli.csl.1000/page/ n157/mode/2up?view=theaterDr. Vishwanath Pandey (editor), Founder of Banaras Hindu University:

State Of U.p. . Vs. M/s. Lalta Prasad Vaish And Sons

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

In the State of Bihar vs. Industrial Corporation (P) Ltd., (2003) 11 SCC465(“Industrial Corporation (P) Ltd.”), the respondent companies were engaged in the manufacture of rectified spirit from molasses allotted to them by the Controller of Molasses … the appellant therein, who had composite and multiple licences to manufacture potable liquor, was outside the sweep of second part of Rule 9 of the aforesaid Rules. That to such distilleries the first part of the Rule … State of Andhra Pradesh had prohibited the manufacture of liquor by an amendment in the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act, 1995. The appellants therein who were … denuded of its power to enact the Kerala Finance Act 7 of 2002. 18.7 Thus, when the State of Kerala intended to amend the State … the Civil Appeal No.151 of 2007 Etc. Page 123 of 241 Central Provinces and Berar, Assam and … be committing an offence which is punishable under Section 49 of the aforesaid Act. Therefore, it was

Krishna S/O Panchamrao Khopade Vs. Satish S/O Jhaulal Chaturvedi and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 30, 31, 33, 33(1), 34, 36, 36(2), 36(4), 77, 77(1), 77(2), 77(3), 78, 80, 83(1), 100(1), 103, 123(1) and 123(6); Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 14; Representation of the People (3rd Amending) Act, 2002 - Sections 33A, 33B and 75A; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 90; Conduct of Elections (Amendment) Rules, 2002 - Rule 19(1); Constitution of India - Articles 32, 84, 102, 141, 142, 145(3), 173, 191, 246, 286, 324, 327, 329; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR96

laying down the parameters of that right. (5) Section 33-B inserted by the Representation of the People (3rd Amendment) Act, 2002 does not pass the test of constitutionality firstly for the reason that it imposes blanket ban on dissemination … the need of the hour and the future exigencies and expedients and secondly for the reason that the ban operates despite the fact that the … 1961. The incurring of expenditure in contravention to Section 77 is a corrupt practice within the meaning of Section 123(6) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short 'the Act') and the election of R-1 is

Lok Prahari, Through Its General Secretary s.n. Shukla Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

The Representation of the People (Third Amendment) Act, 1951 (Act No.72 of 2002) 17 Democratic Reforms & Another, (2002) 5 SCC294need not be given.25. The … and (ii) the sources of their income.49. The obligation to make the second of the above- mentioned two declarations arises as a corollary to the … contains with provisions dealing with local bodies including elections bodies came to be introduced by the Constitution (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992. 2 Under Article 324 2 an Election Commission was established for the overall superintendence and control of … be disqualified for a period not exceeding six years as may be determined by the President of India. Section 123 of the RP Act of 1951 defines corrupt practices. Ten corrupt practices are enumerated therein. By definition each