Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: companies second amendment act 2002 section 117 · Page 1 of about 247 results (0.097 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 31 2012

Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Others. Vs. Securitie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-31-2012

Subject : Companies

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 55A(b), 55A(c), 56, 57, 58, 60B, 60B(1), (2), 2(19A), 60B(9), 235 to 241, 73, 73(1)(2A), 209-A , 68A(1)(a), 2(45AA), 81(1A), 234(1), 234(4)(a), 67(3), 62, 63, 108A, 109, 110, 117A, 117B, 117C, 56, 62, 63, 642, 642(4), 2(19A); Securities and Exchange Board of India (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 ; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 - Regulations 3, 6, 2(zc), 2(p), 2(n), 4(2), 5(1), 6, 7, 16(1), 20(1), 25, 26, 36, 37, 46, 57; Securities and Exchange Board of India(SEBI) Act 1992 - Section 11C, 11A, 15Z, 55A, 68A, 77A, 80A, 108, 109, 110 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 206, 206A, 207, 59 to 81,; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, Form No. 2A,; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act(SCR), 1956 - Section 2(h), 21, 73(1)(3), 28, 28(1)(b), 20; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Section 55A, 67(3); Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 2(19B), 60B(9), 60B(1)(2)(3), ; Constitution of India - Articles 129, ; Companies Act, 2006 - Sections 755, 760,; Food Safety Modernization(FSMA), Act 2000 - Section 85; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Section 45I(f) ; Companies Amendment Act 53 of 2000 - Section 81(1A); Insurance Act, 1938 - Section 2; Securities Laws (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 13, 16, 28(1)(b), 28(2); Indian Evidence Act - Section 114 ; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, 4D; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Rules, 2003 - Rule 2,; UPC (PA) Amendment Rules 2011 ; SCR Rules - Rule 19; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Amendment Rules 2011

Reported in : (2013)1SCC1

a recognized stock exchange. Section 60B, as already indicated, refers to IM. Section 2(19B) was inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1.4.2003, which reads as follows:“2(19B) "information memorandum" means a process undertaken prior to the filing of a … 108 to 110. Further, the Legislature never wanted the inclusion of Sections 117A to C, hence it used Section 117 alone, not Sections 116 to 122. If it has used so, then Sections 117A to C also would

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2006

Raghunath Rai Bareja and anr. Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-06-2006

Subject : BankingLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 136; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446, 446(1) and 446(3); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18, 19, 24, 31, 31(1) and 34; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 34, Rule 11; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9, 10 and 117; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(2)ALT114(SC); 2007(1)AWC507(SC); [2007]135CompCas163(SC); (2007)1CompLJ108(SC); 2007(5)CTC642; 2007(3)MhLj83; 2007MPLJ306(SC); 2006(13)SCALE511; (2007)2SCC230; 2006AIRSCW6446

16. In this connection, it may be mentioned that Section 446(3) of the Companies Act was omitted by Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 and evidently the High Court has overlooked this Amendment. As a result in our opinion the High Court … another Company Petition No. 236 of 1998 under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rule 117 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 seeking leave of the Company Court to commence the Execution proceedings before

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2003

Nasik Hing Supplying Company Vs. Annapurna Gruh Udyog Bhandar

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-04-2003

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4, 4(1), 96, 100, 100A, 104, 104(1), 104(2) and 105 - Order 43, Rule 1; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 97, 109(5) and 109(8); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 and 2002

Reported in : AIR2003Guj275; (2003)2GLR926; (2003)2PLR926; [2003]46SCL118(Guj)

Judge of the High Court in writ proceedings has been done away with, consequently now with the C.P.C. Amendment Act, 2002, abolition of Letters Patent Appeals is confined to appeals against the judgment of a single Judge exercising his … Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 or Section 202 of the Companies Act and other similar local or special Acts. If these special Acts … of Section 100A of the C.P.C. that it prohibits any kind of second appeal. 7. On the other hand, Mr. G.N. Shah, learned Counsel appearing … of the C.P.C. and Letters Patent. (ii) The Bombay High Court had completely overlooked the legal effect of Section 117 and Order 49, Rule 3. (iii) Far from excluding the Code, there could be other special Acts which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 06 2012

Masusmi Sa Investment Llc Vs. Keystone Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-06-2012

Subject : Arbitration

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board [made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002] may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … by a common order. FACTS IN COMPANY APPEAL (L) NO. 47 OF 2012: 2. By this appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, the appellant challenges the order dated 12th October, 2012 passed by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2026

Harjit Singh vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-12-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

been incorporated under a Parliamentary enactment known as Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 and the Institutes of Technology (Amendment) Act, 2002. Since, IIT-Roorkee has been incorporated under the aforesaid enactments, it will be ‘a public’ entity within the meaning … 737, Pocket-I, Janta Flats, Paschim Puri, West, Delhi (“Subject Premises”) whereLPA 117/2026 Page 1 of 9she occupies first, second and third floors. The Subject Premises comprises of four floors namely ground plus 3 floors. Initially, the entire … though not been defined in the Telecom Rules, however, in terms of Section 10(1)(b) of the Act, public entity would mean: (i) the Central Government;

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 2010

Vijay Sekhri and Another Vs M/S. Tinna Oils and Chemicals and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-02-2010

Subject : Companies Act

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F , 50 ; Arbitration Act - 8 ; 45

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board 2[made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002] may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … have been filed by ADM Interoceanic Limited, the respondent No. 2, for dismissal of the present appeals under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as Companies Act, for short) filed by Vijay Sekhri

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2019

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-13-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Chapters 1-B and 1-C of the Companies Act, 6 (2010) 11 SCC112 PART A1956as inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act 2002 which provided for the constitution of a National Company Law Tribunal7 and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal8 … defeated. This view has been resonated by this Court since it was 117 highlighted by Justice P.N. Bhagwati in Bihar Legal Support Authority vs. Chief … demonstrate an apparent disparity in 96 age of superannuation of Members and Chairpersons/Presiding Officers of different Tribunals. Illustratively, Section 14D of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 provides a Member of Telecom Disputes Settlement and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2008

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-24-2008

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

list' (List III). Entry 17A reads thus:'Entry 17A:- (F) Forest' This has been inserted by the Constitution (Forty Second Amendment) Act, 1976, Section 57 ( with effect from 3rd January, 1977). The net result of this is that by … of the villages stipulated therein. A reference is made to this Court's order in PIL No. 17 of 2002 and it is stated that the area which has been stipulated in the notice against the village and … 1967 and in the said Development Plan the lands bearing survey Nos. 117, 118 and 120 were shown as falling within the residential zone. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2004

P.S. Sathappan (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Andhra Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-07-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9), 3, 4, 4(1), 35A, 96 to 103, 104, 104(1), 104(2), 105, 105(2), 115, 117, 135, 217(1), 218D, 278 and 282 - Order 7, Rules 10 and 11 - Order 10, Rule 3 - Order 16, Rule 2 - Order 18, Rules 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 16 - Order 20, Rules 1 and 8 - Order 21, Rules 72, 90 and 92 - Order 33, Rule 7 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 35 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 49, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 136, 225, 329 and 372; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; ;Indian High Courts Act, 1861; Legislative Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 223; India (Adaptation of Existing Laws) Order, 1949; Independence Act, 1947 - Section

Reported in : AIR2004SC5152; 2004(5)CTC209; JT2004(8)SC464; (2005)1MLJ105(SC); RLW2005(1)SC19; 2004(8)SCALE601; (2004)11SCC672

in the Code by reason of Code of Civil Procedure amendment Act, 1976 or Code of Civil Procedure Amendment Act, 2002. In any event the provision of Section 100A of the Code being not retrospective in operation, the right … this Court while construing the provisions of Section 202 of the Indian Companies Act observed as follows : There was no doubt either that most … Patent of the Madras High Court would govern the forum for a second appeal therefrom; the only restriction being that such an order must be … ought to have been made. (2) No appeal shall lie from any order passed in appeal under this section.''117. Application of Code to High Court.-Save as provided in this Part or in Part X or in rules,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2010

Ucb Farchim Sa Vs. Cipla Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-08-2010

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 15, 25(1), 25(2), 25(4), 64, 116, 117A and 117G; Constitution of India - Article 226; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Patents (Amendment) Act, 1999; Patents Rules - Rule 55

Reported in : LC2010(1)278

from the date of the publication of the grant of patent. A second significant difference, after the amendment of 2005, is that a pre-grant opposition … before the High Court under Section 116 of the Patents Act (it must be clarified here that although Section 117 A was inserted in the Patents Act in 2002, it was not notified till 2nd April 2007 and … the scheme of the Patents Act, particularly after the amendment to the relevant provisions by way of Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Amendment Act.) as well as the judgment of the Supreme Court in J. Mitra & Company v.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial