Advanced Search Results

Duroflex Ltd. Vs. Johnny Mathew

Court : Kerala

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 10, 10E(1), (1A), (4B) to (4D), 10F, 18, 111, 111(1), 111(2), 111(3), 111(4), 111(5), 111(7), 111(10), 113(4), 155 and 155(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29(2) and 137 - Article 137; Maharashtra Rent Control Act - Sections 18; Telangana Area Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 8A; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Securities Act, 1992; Special Court Act - Sections 9A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 196; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21

Reported in : (2008)2CompLJ314(Ker); [2007]75SCL569(Ker)

exercise and discharge such powers and functions as may be conferred on it before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 by or under this Act or any other law, and shall also exercise and discharge such other powers … An application (appeal) was filed by the first respondent before the Company Law Board, South Region Bench under Section 111(2) of the Companies Act (for short 'the Act') as the company refused to register the transaction of 67,300

Shree Mahabaleswara Auto Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Repre ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Reported in : 2012(7)MLJ805

standard and hence the same need to be quashed. 20. It is to be pointed out that the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, which was to take effect from 1.4.2003 with reference to the National Company Law Tribunal had not been … all necessary steps to recover the said amount. Consequently, M.P.No.2 of 2010 is also dismissed. Companies Act - Section 111, Section 235, Section 397, Section 398 and Section 402 -

Gopal Krishan vs.super Cassettes Industries Ltd. & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

since in fact the repeal of the said provision had not been notified till April 2015. (b) The Companies (Second Amendment) Act 2002, the Press Note No.2/2003 dated 4th April 2003, the notification dated 10th July, 2012 of the Ministry of … the Applicant. According to the contesting... RESPONDENTS at the time that the application was filed on 22nd July 2002 Section 391 (7) of the Act had not been repealed and an appeal could have been filed thereunder. This … numbers of the shares were missing in the form. There was a remedy available to the Appellant under Section 111(2) by way of an appeal before the Company Law Board in the Co. App. No.15/2013 Page 5 of

E.Bapanaiah Vs. K.S.Raju Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contempt of Court

as under:- “Provided that the provision of this section shall not apply on and after commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002.” As such, on the date (3.8.2007) order passed by learned single Judge, the depositor had no option of … Corporation of India Ltd. and others[1]., this Court has held that CLB in the proceedings before it under Section 111 of the Companies Act since performs curial functions, hence it is a “court” within the meaning of Section

Md.MoiuudIn Vs. Most.Haliman Nisa and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contempt of Court

as under:- “Provided that the provision of this section shall not apply on and after commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002.” As such, on the date (3.8.2007) order passed by learned single Judge, the depositor had no option of … Corporation of India Ltd. and others[1]., this Court has held that CLB in the proceedings before it under Section 111 of the Companies Act since performs curial functions, hence it is a “court” within the meaning of Section

India Switch Company Private Vs. Aci (India) Inc.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2007)136CompCas470

the register of members of the company. The Notes on clauses in the Bill which preceded the Companies Amendment Act, 1988 relating to Section 111 states that there is no limitation period provided for making the application for … of Rs. 100/- each, to be held by the petitioner (30%), the second respondent (51%), the third respondent (4%) and the fourth respondent (15%). Accordingly, … the provisions of Section 17 of the Securitisation & Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 held that the word used therein though was "Appeal" actually was in the nature of a "Suit", as

Auduth Modu Timblo and Another Vs. Dilip Modu Timblo and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Section 111 as set out in the notes on clauses in the Bill which preceded the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988 says that âthere is no limitation period provided for making the application for rectification of Register of … been heard on the same. 22. My answer to the first question is in the affirmative and the second, in the negative. Here are the reasons: 23. The CLB is constituted under Section 10E of the Act. … of his shareholding of 6,666 shares for the years ended March 31, 2002 and March 31, 2006. It was thus, contended that the Company Petition

P.Kumar Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

for the petitioner would submit that Chapter IV A of the Companies Act was introduced by means of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002. He would further submit that as per the said amendment, in the place of ".Company Law Board"., ".Tribunal". … Government Arts College, Nandanam. This Court had the benefit of hearing them also. According to them, as per Section 388-E of the Act, which was introduced by means of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the ".Tribunal". alone … marks with reference to Question Nos.55, 61, 73, 77, 90, 102, 103, 111 and 150 for the Booklet Series B in the Commerce Subject more

Arunachalam Muthu Vs. Nafan Bv and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … 1. The Appellant has filed the above Appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the Act”) impugning the order dated 31st May 2012 passed by the … powers of the Company Court under the Act, inter alia, under Sections 111, 397 and 398 of the Act. Thus the CLB was effectively a

Subhash Chander Vs. Fathay Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

defence-appeal dismissed with costs of Rs. 2,00,000/- (B) Transfer of Property Act, 1882-Section 106 (3)-Notice terminating tenancy -By amendment of 2002, by sub-section (3), raising of technical defences as to validity of 15 days notice to terminate … Valmiki J. Mehta, J. (Oral) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/plaintiff/landlord against … of landlord and tenant. (F) Transfer of Property Act, 1882-Section 108 (g), 111 (a)- Termination of lease-Mere acceptance of rent by landlord from tenant in