Advanced Search Results

Shri Vishram Jaya Shetkar Alias Manohar Jaya Shetkar and Others Vs. Sh ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Civil Procedure by virtue of section 5 r/w section 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002? 11. Mr. D. J. Pangam, learned Advocate, argued on behalf of the plaintiffs whereas, Mr. Galileo Teles, learned … This Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 30/4/2003 passed by … question of law at serial no. 4 is concerned, Mr. Pangam, learned Advocate for the plaintiffs, argued that section 102 of the Code of Civil Procedure(C.P.C.), which has been amended by virtue of section 5 of the Code

P.Kumar Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

for the petitioner would submit that Chapter IV A of the Companies Act was introduced by means of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002. He would further submit that as per the said amendment, in the place of ".Company Law Board"., ".Tribunal". … Government Arts College, Nandanam. This Court had the benefit of hearing them also. According to them, as per Section 388-E of the Act, which was introduced by means of Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, the ".Tribunal". alone … award full marks with reference to Question Nos.55, 61, 73, 77, 90, 102, 103, 111 and 150 for the Booklet Series B in the Commerce

Mohd. Riyazur Rehman Siddiqui Vs. Deputy Director of Health Services

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 110, 110C, 140, 163A, 165 to 174, 175 and 176; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10F, 397, 398 and 483; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 71, 107 and 108; Specific Relief Act - Sections 6 and 6(3); Contempt of Courts Act - Sections 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Limitation Act - Sections 4 to 24; Defence of India Act; General Clauses Act, 1897; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 127(1), 217, 217(1), 218D and 218D(1); Kerala High Court Act - Sections 5; Indian Succession Act - Sections

Reported in : 2009ACJ585; 2008(6)MhLj941

under:483. Appeals from orders - Appeals from any order made or decision given before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, in the matter of the winding up of a company by the Court shall lie to the same … Code, no appeal is provided from an appellate decree which is passed by the High Court itself. Under Section 102 of the Code which was also amended by the Code of Civil Procedure Amendment Act, 2002 with effect

Shri Chandreshwar Bhuthanath Devastan of Paroda by Its Special Attorne ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (2003)105BOMLR915

100A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which has been amended by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 will be prospective in operation or retrospective in operation. The aforesaid Amendment was brought into force on 1st … clearly emerge:(i) That the legal pursuit of a remedy, suit, appeal and second appeal are really but steps in a series of proceedings all connected … of the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897).(a) the provisions of Section 102 of the principal Act as substituted by Section 5 of this Act, shall not apply to or affect,

Shri Vishram Jaya Shetkar Alias Manohar Jaya Shetkar and Others Vs. Sh ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Civil Procedure by virtue of section 5 r/w section 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002? 11. Mr. D. J. Pangam, learned Advocate, argued on behalf of the plaintiffs whereas, Mr. Galileo Teles, learned … This Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 30/4/2003 passed by … question of law at serial no. 4 is concerned, Mr. Pangam, learned Advocate for the plaintiffs, argued that section 102 of the Code of Civil Procedure(C.P.C.), which has been amended by virtue of section 5 of the Code

Food Corporation of India and anr. Vs. Munnilal Singh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 89, 100, 102 and 115 - Order 41, Rule 3; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 16(2) - Order 41, Rule 11 - Order 42, Rule 2; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1999 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2003MP66; [2003(4)JCR320(MP)]; 2003(2)MPLJ290

the subject matter of the original suit does not exceed three thousand rupees.' By Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act. 2002, Section 102 substituted as under :'102. No second appeal in certain No second appeal shall lie from any decree, when

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Chapters 1-B and 1-C of the Companies Act, 6 (2010) 11 SCC112 PART A1956as inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act 2002 which provided for the constitution of a National Company Law Tribunal7 and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal8 … of delivery of justice through tribunals. After analysing the success story of 102 Tribunals in U.K., this Court noticed a contrast in India and expressed … demonstrate an apparent disparity in 96 age of superannuation of Members and Chairpersons/Presiding Officers of different Tribunals. Illustratively, Section 14D of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 provides a Member of Telecom Disputes Settlement and

Videocon International Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Board of India (Amendment) Ordinance, 2002. The Ordinance was replaced by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Amendment) Act, 2002. Section 15Z, as amended is reproduced hereunder:- "15Z. Appeal to Supreme Court- Any person aggrieved by any decision or … law arising out of such order." (emphasis is ours) A perusal of Section 15Z reveals, that when the second appellate remedy was made available to an aggrieved party for the first time, the forum for the second

Pannalal Bhansali versus Bharti Telecom Limited & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 3 S.C.R. 493

running foul of the mandate declared in 2010-MBA3. The Constitution Bench in 2010-MBA3 considered the challenge against the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, constituting the NCLT & NCLAT; pointedly for our purpose, with reference to Section 10-FL insofar as the constitution … were not supplied. There are serious procedural infractions and inadequate, misleading disclosures, in violation of the mandate of Section 102 of the Act of 2013, which vitiates the entire process of reduction of shareholding. On a summing up

Novartis AG Vs Venkata Narayana Active Ingredients Pvt Ltd

Court : Chennai

to the provisions of this Act, the term of every patent granted, after the commencement of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (38 of 2002), and the term of every patent which has not expired and has not ceased to … the answers to questions 12 to 14 and 31 to 58 regarding supplies made by the defendant to companies in Egypt. Referring to the Advocate Commissioner’s reports (Exs.P11 and P20), he pointed out that the defendant had … that the above mentioned products are best selling pharmaceutical products of the second plaintiff, which is a subsidiary of the first plaintiff and the user … VII Rules 1 and 2 of CPC read with Proviso 1 to Section 7 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of … [Del] [DB] (Bayer), particularly paragraphs 88, 93, 96,100, 102,103, 107, 111 and 119 thereof. He also relied