Advanced Search Results

Mineria Nacional Limitada, a Partnership Firm and Shri Anil Vasudeva S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CompanyLimitation

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 4(2), 10F, 10(3), 10(12), 13, 14 and 260A; Companies(Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24, 29(2), 34 and 34(2); Uttar Pradesh Sales-Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3B and 10; Sales Tax Act - Sections 10 and 10(3B); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A; Special Court(Trial of Offences Relating to transactions in Securities) Act, 1992; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 43

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR789

aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies(Second Amendment Act, 2002) may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … place at which the registered Office of the Company concerned is situated as indicated by Section 2(11) r/w Section 10(12)(a) of the Act. 4. There is no dispute that the Order sought to be appealed was passed by

Raghunath Rai Bareja and anr. Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : BankingLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 136; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446, 446(1) and 446(3); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18, 19, 24, 31, 31(1) and 34; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 34, Rule 11; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9, 10 and 117; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(2)ALT114(SC); 2007(1)AWC507(SC); [2007]135CompCas163(SC); (2007)1CompLJ108(SC); 2007(5)CTC642; 2007(3)MhLj83; 2007MPLJ306(SC); 2006(13)SCALE511; (2007)2SCC230; 2006AIRSCW6446

16. In this connection, it may be mentioned that Section 446(3) of the Companies Act was omitted by Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 and evidently the High Court has overlooked this Amendment. As a result in our opinion the High Court … petition including costs of this application and such costs, charges and expenses as may be payable under Rule 10 together with such subsequent interest as may be payable under Rule 11 of Order XXXIV of the first

Duroflex Ltd. Vs. Johnny Mathew

Court : Kerala

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 10, 10E(1), (1A), (4B) to (4D), 10F, 18, 111, 111(1), 111(2), 111(3), 111(4), 111(5), 111(7), 111(10), 113(4), 155 and 155(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29(2) and 137 - Article 137; Maharashtra Rent Control Act - Sections 18; Telangana Area Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 8A; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Securities Act, 1992; Special Court Act - Sections 9A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 196; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21

Reported in : (2008)2CompLJ314(Ker); [2007]75SCL569(Ker)

exercise and discharge such powers and functions as may be conferred on it before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 by or under this Act or any other law, and shall also exercise and discharge such other powers … High Court. Then the question is what are the powers given to the CLB under the Companies Act? Section 10 of the Act deals with constitution of Company Law Board. Section 10E (1), (1 A) and (4B) to

Sumitomo Corporation Vs. Cdc Financial Services (Mauritius) Ltd. and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 10(1), 10F, 397, 398, 399 and 402; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 8, 37, 44, 45, 47, 47(2), 48 and 50; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16 to 20

Reported in : AIR2008SC1594; 2008(1)ARBLR452(SC); (2008)1CompLJ393(SC); JT2008(3)SC32; 2008(4)MhLj31; 2008(3)SCALE92; (2008)4SCC91; [2008]82SCL495(SC); 2008AIRSCW1766; MANU/SC/1101/2008

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein for lack of territorial jurisdiction holding that Section 10(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956 will take precedence over Section 50 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Chapters 1-B and 1-C of the Companies Act, 6 (2010) 11 SCC112 PART A1956as inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act 2002 which provided for the constitution of a National Company Law Tribunal7 and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal8 … of 1986); (ix) Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (28 of 1987); (x) Section 10 of the Special Courts (Trial of Offences relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (27 of 1992); (xi)

New Bridge Holdings B.V. Vs. Ttk-lig Limited and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act - Section 406; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 10; Land Revenue Act - Section 40; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 195(1)(b); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39 Rule 2(3)

gain. [Provided that the provisions of this section shall not apply on and after the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002.]” 11. Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 confers a power on the High Court to

In Re: Ritesh Polysters Limited a

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2005)123CompCas348

contentious issue, it would be necessary to extract the provisions of Section 621A as stood prior to the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, which reads as under: - "621A: Composition of certain offences: - (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code … the Company came out in the year 1995 with a public issue of 30,00,000 equity shares of Rs. 10/- each for cash at a premium of Rs. 5/- per share aggregating Rs. 450 lakhs. The prospectus dated

Ms Aarti Sponge and Power Vs. Bimal Kumar and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board [made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002] may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … (APPEAL UNDER SECTION 10-F OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956) Dr. I.M. QUDDUSI, J, 1. The instant appeal has been filed u/s

Mahesh Chandra Sharma vs.tycoon Seeds Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board [made before the commencement of the Companies (second amendment) Act, 2002]. may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH Ghosh, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This appeal is filed under section 10 (F) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) seeking to impugn the order dated

National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales TaxCompany

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 33C; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 and 394; Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy and Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : [2004]118CompCas556(Bom); (2004)2CompLJ160(Bom); [2004]51SCL629(Bom); [2004]135STC50(Bom)

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. By the Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy and Amendment) Act, 2002, published on May 4, 2002, Section 33C has been inserted into the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 ('the … 1956, are complied with, the High Court by an order dated November 10, 1994, approved the amalgamation of the two companies from the appointed date, … is not competent to declare that for the purposes of sales tax, the date of amalgamation of the companies shall not be from the date declared by the court or the Central Government under the Companies Act, … by the court or the Central Government under the above Act and secondly, assuming the State has such legislative competence, then, such power cannot be