Advanced Search Results

Raghunath Rai Bareja and anr. Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : BankingLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 136; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446, 446(1) and 446(3); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18, 19, 24, 31, 31(1) and 34; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 34, Rule 11; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9, 10 and 117; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(2)ALT114(SC); 2007(1)AWC507(SC); [2007]135CompCas163(SC); (2007)1CompLJ108(SC); 2007(5)CTC642; 2007(3)MhLj83; 2007MPLJ306(SC); 2006(13)SCALE511; (2007)2SCC230; 2006AIRSCW6446

16. In this connection, it may be mentioned that Section 446(3) of the Companies Act was omitted by Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 and evidently the High Court has overlooked this Amendment. As a result in our opinion the High Court … together with such subsequent interest as may be payable under Rule 11 of Order XXXIV of the first Schedule to Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and that the balance, if any, shall be paid to the defendants/respondents

Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Others. Vs. Securitie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Companies

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 55A(b), 55A(c), 56, 57, 58, 60B, 60B(1), (2), 2(19A), 60B(9), 235 to 241, 73, 73(1)(2A), 209-A , 68A(1)(a), 2(45AA), 81(1A), 234(1), 234(4)(a), 67(3), 62, 63, 108A, 109, 110, 117A, 117B, 117C, 56, 62, 63, 642, 642(4), 2(19A); Securities and Exchange Board of India (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 ; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 - Regulations 3, 6, 2(zc), 2(p), 2(n), 4(2), 5(1), 6, 7, 16(1), 20(1), 25, 26, 36, 37, 46, 57; Securities and Exchange Board of India(SEBI) Act 1992 - Section 11C, 11A, 15Z, 55A, 68A, 77A, 80A, 108, 109, 110 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 206, 206A, 207, 59 to 81,; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, Form No. 2A,; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act(SCR), 1956 - Section 2(h), 21, 73(1)(3), 28, 28(1)(b), 20; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Section 55A, 67(3); Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 2(19B), 60B(9), 60B(1)(2)(3), ; Constitution of India - Articles 129, ; Companies Act, 2006 - Sections 755, 760,; Food Safety Modernization(FSMA), Act 2000 - Section 85; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Section 45I(f) ; Companies Amendment Act 53 of 2000 - Section 81(1A); Insurance Act, 1938 - Section 2; Securities Laws (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 13, 16, 28(1)(b), 28(2); Indian Evidence Act - Section 114 ; Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956 - Rule 4CC, 4D; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Rules, 2003 - Rule 2,; UPC (PA) Amendment Rules 2011 ; SCR Rules - Rule 19; Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Amendment Rules 2011

Reported in : (2013)1SCC1

a recognized stock exchange. Section 60B, as already indicated, refers to IM. Section 2(19B) was inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1.4.2003, which reads as follows:“2(19B) "information memorandum" means a process undertaken prior to the filing of a … reports to be set out are provided under Section 56 of the Act, read with Part 1 of Schedule 11 of the Companies Act, which also calls for the details of the stock exchange where application was

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Chapters 1-B and 1-C of the Companies Act, 6 (2010) 11 SCC112 PART A1956as inserted by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act 2002 which provided for the constitution of a National Company Law Tribunal7 and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal8 … imposition of a short tenure of three years for the members of the Tribunals as enumerated in the Schedule of Tribunals Rules, 2017. A short tenure, coupled with provision of routine suspensions pending enquiry and lack of

Duroflex Ltd. Vs. Johnny Mathew

Court : Kerala

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 10, 10E(1), (1A), (4B) to (4D), 10F, 18, 111, 111(1), 111(2), 111(3), 111(4), 111(5), 111(7), 111(10), 113(4), 155 and 155(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29(2) and 137 - Article 137; Maharashtra Rent Control Act - Sections 18; Telangana Area Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 8A; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Securities Act, 1992; Special Court Act - Sections 9A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 196; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21

Reported in : (2008)2CompLJ314(Ker); [2007]75SCL569(Ker)

exercise and discharge such powers and functions as may be conferred on it before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 by or under this Act or any other law, and shall also exercise and discharge such other powers … prescribes for any suit, appeal or application a period of limitation different from the period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of Section 3 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the Schedule

Smt. Hetal Alpesh Muchhala Vs. Adityesh Educational Institute and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ArbitrationCompany

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 33, 34 and 34(3); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35 and 35(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10E(4C), 10E(4D), 10F, 397 and 398; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1963; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1974; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 252; Evidence Act; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2)

Reported in : [2009]152CompCas75(Bom)

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board (made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002) may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … JJ] Court fee on Petition under Section 34 of the Act Bombay Court Fees Act (36 of 1959), Schedule I, Article 3, Schedule II, Article 1(f)(iii) Held, According to Article 3 of Schedule I, on any plaint, application

Sharath Rukmangada and Another Vs. Cauvery Papers Limited (In Liqn), R ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Company

or before or after commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960] (65 of 1960) (3) ***Omitted by the Companies (Second Amendment Act) Act, 2002 (4) Nothing in sub-section (1) or sub- section (3) shall apply to any proceeding pending in … No.2 was filed by respondent No.3- IARC on 24.06.2015 before respondent No.2 under Rule 85 of the second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961, read with Section 22 of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks

Valliyamma vs Harrisons Malayalam Limited

Court : Kerala

be referred as per their status before the trial court.) Plaintiff is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act having its registered office at Kochi and having estates in various places including the one at Arapetta, … DISTRICT. 673 577 BY ADVS. M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR K.JOHN MATHAI JOSON MANAVALAN KURYAN THOMAS PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR FINAL HEARING ON 10.01.2023, THE COURT ON 30.01.2023 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.R.ANITHA, J … receipts proving payment of tax by the plaintiff company for the period 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005.18. Apart from that, plaintiff also produced Ext.A4, which is … the company to file the suit. Plaint A schedule property absolutely belongs to the company having acquired … Appellants are the defendants. Suit originally was filedfor permanent injunction and subsequently amended for recovery possession. (Parties would hereafter be referred as per their status

M/S.Pioneer Alloy Castings Ltd., (In Liq Vs. 1.The Assistantgeneral Ma ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

in appeal before the Supreme Court or a High Court. Section 537 (Prior to its substitution by the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002 - 537 - Avoidance of certain attachments, executions, etc., in winding up by or subject to supervision of … confirmation thereof was stayed subject to the applicant depositing five installments of Rs.10 crores each, as per the schedule fixed therein. The order also made it clear that in case of default, the bank shall be free

Brunton Developers vs United Breweries (Holdings) Limited (in Liquidat ...

Court : Karnataka

recovery of any tax or impost or any dues payable to the Government.1. Substituted by the Companies (SecondAmendment) Act, 2002 (w.e.f. a date yet to be notified). Prior to its substitution, section 537 read as under: "537. Avoidance … a registered sale deed dated 21.05.2012. The aforesaid property is hereinafter referred to as the 'schedule property'.8. The scheduled property was conveyed by the first respondent to the appellant under a duly stamped and registered sale deed

Vrajlal Talakshi Gala Vs. Orient Realtors Private Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment Act, 2002) may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … leave to the Applicant/Appellant to amend the Company Appeal and all pending Company Applications therein in terms of Schedule-I annexed hereto; (b) that pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Appeal, Court Receiver, High Court,