Advanced Search Results
Core Healthcare Limited Vs. Nirma Limited
Gujarat
Mar-01-2007
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 35, 43A, 55, 78, 81(1), 81(1A), 100 to 104, 189, 191, 235 to 251, 390, 391, 391 to 394, 395, 395(4A), 425(1), 433, 484, 529(1), 529A, 529A(1), 529A(2), 530 and 643; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 5, 5(1), 13, 13(2), 13(4), 13(6), 13(8), 13(13), 17, 17A, 35 and 37; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15(1); Recovery Act; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2001 - Sections 153; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 153; Companies Act, 1948 - Sections 206, 207, 208 and 209; Companies (Consolidation) Act, 1908 - Sections 120; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 72A(4); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 69 and 69A; Contract Act; Goods Act; Joint Stock Co
[2007]138CompCas204(Guj); [2007]79SCL47(Guj)
which an order has been made before the commencement of this Act under Section 153 of the Indian Companies [Amendment] Act,2001, sanctioning a compromise or an arrangement.Information as to compromises or arrangements with creditors and members.393 [1] Where
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskReliance Natural Resources Ltd. Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
May-07-2010
CompanyConstitution
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 36, 153A, 193, 194, 195, 235 to 351, 391 to 394, 394(1), 433 and 643; ;Oil Fields (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948; ;Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and Maritime Zones Act, 1976; ;Contract Act - Section 17; ;Petroleum and Natural Gas Rules, 1959; ;Evidence Act - Sections 17, 18 and 20; ;Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 38, 39, 73, 77(3), 297 and 298; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 2001; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 1965
2007(Supp.)Bom.C.R.925
apply to a company in respect of which an order has been made before the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2001 sanctioning a compromise or an arrangement.393. Information as to compromises or arrangements with creditors and members - (1) … under the PSC.(t) With these details, RNRL on 07.11.2006/08.11.2006, filed a Company application No. 1122 of 2006 under Section 392 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') before the High Court of Bombay
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna H. Bajaj Through Her Constituted Attorney Mr. Shailesh Bajaj V ...
Mumbai
Feb-21-2009
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 73, 209A, 235 to 351, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 392, 393, 393(1), 394, 394(2), 406, 433, 542 and 643; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2001
2009(111)BomLR1509; [2009]152CompCas43(Bom)
apply to a company in respect of which an order has been made before the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2001 sanctioning a compromise or an arrangement.]393. Information as to compromises or arrangements with creditors and members - (1) … is further submitted that the transferor Company has not disclosed the fact in petition about pending investigation under Section 209A of the Companies Act. It is also submitted that as per the proviso to Section 391 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vahid Paper Converters and ors. Vs. Ito and ors.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Nov-09-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)98ITD165(Ahd.)
(Amendment and Misc. Provisions) Act, 1986 with effect from 1-4-1988 whereby Section 34 was omitted. Further the Finance Act, 2001 inserted Explanation 5 to Section 32 with effect from 1-4-2002.6. At the time of hearing before us, Shri … individuals and firms because they are not required to prepare profit and loss account as provided for the companies in the Companies Act. As regards the Mahendra Mills's case, he observed is a case relating to Asstt.Year
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Prudential Capital Markets Ltd. (In Liquidation)
Kolkata
Oct-08-2007
Company
Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Section 45I, 45IA(4), 45IA(7), 45MB(2) and 45MC; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53A, 391, 441(2), 446(2), 531, 531(1), 531A, 536(2) and 537(1); ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960; ;Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10 and 32; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956; ;Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control (Amendment) Act, 2005; ;Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control (Amendment) Act, 2001; ;Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 59; ;Provincial Insolvency Act - Section 54; ;Presidency Towns Insolvency Act - Section 56; ;West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950; ;Transfer of Property Act - Section 107; ;Registration Act, 1908 - Section 17(1); ;Rent
(2008)1CompLJ314(Cal),[2008]84SCL239(Cal)
after the order for the winding up of the company, or before or after the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960 (65 of 1960).531. Fraudulent preference--(1) Any transfer of property, movable or immovable, delivery of goods, payment, execution … conditions set down under Sub-section (4) of Section 45-IA of the 1934 Act.4. Company Petition No. 217 of 2001 was filed by a creditor on 7 April 2001, for winding up the company. The company was directed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.S. Atwal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Ludhiana
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-22-2015
Land Acquisition
registered if they have been executed on or after the commencement of the Registration and Other Related Law (Amendment) Act, 2001. Section 17(1A)further provides that, in case, such a document is not registered, it shall have no effect, for the … of the relevant previous year as if the provisions of clause (6) of the first proviso to sub section (1) of Section 205 of the Companies Act, 1956 are applicable. It was pronounced that there is no reason
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Geeta Devi Mishra and ors. Vs. Anil Kumar Tiwari and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-17-2003
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140, 147, 149(2) and 173; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1994; Repealing and Amending Act, 2001 - Sections 4
2005ACJ424; 2004(1)MPHT82; 2004(1)MPLJ373
Section 140 of the Act which enhanced the compensation from Rs. 25,000/- to Rs. 50,000/-. The Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1994 incorporated the amendment in Section 140 of the original Act and thereafter the amending Act lost its … The amount of Rs. 25,000/- instead of Rs. 50,000/- was awarded in view of the Repealing and Amending Act, 2001.4. After hearing the learned Counsel for both the sides, this Court is of the opinion that the view … by the claimants against the order by which their application under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter to be referred to as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHolland (Respondent) Vs. the Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue a ...
UK Supreme Court
Nov-24-2010
Land Acquisition
a memorandum of association and complying with the requirements of the Act as to registration: Companies Act 1985, section 1; see now Companies Act 2006, section 7. Among the requirements for registration is a statement of the company's … of directors with any appointment, irregular or otherwise, and without any holding out: for Australia see the Corporations Act 2001, section 9, and eg Gebo Investments (Labuan) Ltd v Signatory Investments Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 544; Chameleon Mining NL … de facto directors are within section 212 IA 1986. That section, as amended by para 18 of Schedule 17 to the Enterprise Act 2002, provides
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSnowcem India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-24-2004
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 274(1); Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 21
[2005]124CompCas161(Bom); [2005]60SCL50(Bom)
of Section 274(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956, as amended with effect from December 13, 2000, by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000. The petitioners pray that Section 274(1)(g) be declared illegal, invalid, null, void and unenforceable.2. The brief facts
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Swanstone Multiplex Cinema (P) Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-27-2009
ContractCommercial
Companies Act; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(13), 4, 4(2), 5, 5A, 6, 9 and 11B; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 72; Bombay Entertainments Duty (Amendment) Act, 2001; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 37, 37(1), 37(4), 46 and 64(1); Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995; Bombay Entertainments Duty Rules, 1958 - Rules 7, 15 and 23; Maharashtra Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1966; Constitution of India - Articles 142, 296 and 363
AIR2009SC2750; 2010(1)BomCR463; JT2009(10)SC157; 2009(10)SCALE148; (2009)8SCC235; (2009)24VST552(SC); 2009AIRSCW5189
Clause (b), on and with effect from the date of coming into force of the Bombay Entertainments Duty (Amendment) Act, 2001 (Mah. II of 2002), there shall be levied and collected by the State Government from the proprietor of … Court in Writ Petition No. 22 of 2006.Background facts:3. Respondent is a company registered and incorporated under the Companies Act. It inter alia is engaged in the business of operating a multiplex theatre, commonly known as Fame … illegally realized by the assessee from the cinema-goers would be hit by Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act and, thus, the State would have … the said theatre. Indisputably, the provisions of the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 (for short 'the Act') are applicable to the said multiplex theatre. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »