Advanced Search Results
Gujarat State Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Maegabyte Consultancy Servic ...
Mumbai
Feb-17-1999
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 434(1)
[2003]115CompCas165(Bom)
the petition by order dated March 16, 1998, this court restricted the petition to Section 434(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 1956. 2. Section 434(1)(c) of the Companies Act reads as under : '434. (1) A company shall be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeethai Mills Ltd. Vs. N. Perumalsamy and anr.
Chennai
Aug-10-1979
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 434(1)
(1980)1MLJ443
in Company Petition No. 96of 1974 directing the winding up of the appellant-company under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, hereinafter referred to as the Act.2. The facts are not in controversy. The first respondent herein obtained … for a sum of Rs. 17,093.06 with further interest. The first respondent issued a notice as contemplated in Section 434(1) of the Act. The first notice was returned as 'left' and to a second notice issued to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRegistrar of Companies Vs. S. Sohanmull Golcha P. Ltd.
Rajasthan
Aug-10-1971
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434(1)
1971(4)WLN329
', was presented by the Registrar of Companies, Rajasthan, on May 13, 1964, under Section 439(1)(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act '), on the ground that the company was unable to … on the company by any of its creditors within the meaning of Clause (a) of Sub-section (I) of Section 434 of the Act. So also, it is not the case that any execution or other process issued on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. Vs. Jhalani Tools Ltd.
Delhi
Mar-18-2003
Company
Companies Act - Sections 125, 434 and 434(1); Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act - Sections 20(2); Evidence Act - Sections 17
2003IIIAD(Delhi)547; 104(2003)DLT834; 2003(69)DRJ592; [2003]47SCL757(Delhi)
to as `the JTL') by virtue of a Notice dated 25th March, 1997 under Section 434 of the Companies Act (hereinafter referred to as `the Act') by which the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as `the TISCO') called upon
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: the Vysya Bank Ltd.
Mumbai
Aug-22-1991
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 434 and 434(1)
1992(2)BomCR176; (1991)93BOMLR500
A.A. Cazi, J.1. This is a petition under sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the Company Randhir Steel & Alloys (P) Limited which has its registered officer … the petitioners show that the petitioners have complied with the provisions of Clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 434 of the Companies Act, they will not succeed in this petition. The relevant portion of section 434(1)(a) reads
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevendra Kumar JaIn Vs. Polar Forgings and Tools Ltd.
Delhi
Nov-03-1992
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 434
[1995]84CompCas766(Delhi); 49(1993)DLT552; 1992(24)DRJ598
parties in regard to liability to pay interest and validity of the notice under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act'). I have heard learned counsel in support of these contentions.(4) Mr. Aggarwal, learned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArvind Investment Consultant Vs. Presto Finance Ltd.
Gujarat
Aug-29-1996
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 434 and 439
[1998]94CompCas350(Guj)
winding up order of the respondent-company, Presto Finance Limited, under section 433 read with section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, is the sole question which has come up for adjudication in this petition. 2. The petitioner, Arvind … respondent-company to discharge its financial liability. 5. The petitioner, thereafter, was obliged to issue a statutory notice under section 434(1) of the Companies Act, dated February 2, 1996, demanding an amount of Rs. 88,000 along with the agreed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. M.W. Pardhan
Mumbai
Dec-14-1964
Company
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 434, 434(1) and 439
AIR1966Bom4; (1965)67BOMLR294; ILR1965Bom531
the court Receiver issued statutory notice on 28 the June 1962 an under section 434 of the Indian companies act to the company requiring the company to make payment of Rupees twenty-five lakhs with interest to the Additional
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn the Matter of Advent Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai
Sep-19-1968
Company
Companies Act - Sections 434(1)
[1969]39CompCas463(Bom)
Vimadalal, J. 1. This is a petition under section 433(e) of the Companies Act for the winding up of a company named Advent Corporation Pvt. Ltd. on the ground of its inability … to pay its debts, both by virtue of noncompliance with a statutory notice given under the provisions of section 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, as well as on the ground of its being commercially insolvent. The petition was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.L. Mehta Cinema Enterprises (P.) Ltd. Vs. Pravinchandra P. Mehta
Mumbai
Jan-13-1989
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 434; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 33
1989(3)BomCR101; (1989)91BOMLR92
fiction contained in an envisaged by other statutory provisions such as the one under section 434 of the Companies Act. Section 434 contains a legal fiction. It would be available against a company otherwise solvent which may not respond to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »