Advanced Search Results

Sharada Achar vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

IN WRIT PETITION No.29252 OF 2023 BETWEEN: COUNTRY CLUB HOSPITALITY AND HOLIDAYS LTD., A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AT AMRUTHA CASTLE 5-9-16, SAIFABAD OPPOSITE TO SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD - 500 063 REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. … NEELIGIN ROAD HUBLI - 580 029, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SHIR AMRUT MEHARWADE PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 58(1) OF INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1982. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI DARSHAN R., ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP … QUASHING THE IMPUGNED CIRCULAR DATED 03.09.2020 BEARING NO. RERA/FINANCE - SECTION / 83/2020-21 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY VIDE ANNEXURE-A. IN

M/S Columbia Sportswear India Sourcing Pvt Ltd vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

taken an identical view in Xilinx India’s case supra, as under:-2. The petitioner is a company incorporated underthe Companies Act, 2013. It has its registered office in Hyderabad, Telangana and branch office in New Delhi. The petitioner is a … moved by SGIPL under section 11B of the CE Act as made applicable to the service tax vide section 83 of the Finance Act and which had led to a decision by a Co-ordinate Bench of this court

Sulochana Gupta, vs Rbg Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kerala

of the Articles of Association. W.A.1083/2020 53. Appellants have further stated that as per Section 96(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, the company should hold its Annual General Meeting(AGM) every year and not more than 15 months shall elapse … ourselves of the observations made by this Court in Munshi Ram v. Municipal Committee, Chheharta [1979 (3) SCC 83]. In the said decision, this Court was pleased to observe that: (SCC p. 88, para 23) "23.... when

Novartis Ag and Anr Vs. Cipla Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

(the expression includes predecessor in business and title) Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Limited is a company incorporated under The Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Sandoz House, Shiv Sagar Estate, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli, Mumbai-400018.3. CASE … and plaintiff No.1 spent USD72 billion on pharmaceutical research and development in 2013 as has been published in the Annual Report of plaintiff No.1 for … light of the fact that the working of patents is essential. Working is to be interpreted as per Section 83.16. In the present case, Plaintiff No.1 has given no reason whatsoever for the following: a. Not manufacturing the

Novartis Ag and Anr Vs. Cipla Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

(the expression includes predecessor in business and title) Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Limited is a company incorporated under The Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Sandoz House, Shiv Sagar Estate, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli, Mumbai-400018.3. CASE … and plaintiff No.1 spent USD72 billion on pharmaceutical research and development in 2013 as has been published in the Annual Report of plaintiff No.1 for … light of the fact that the working of patents is essential. Working is to be interpreted as per Section 83.16. In the present case, Plaintiff No.1 has given no reason whatsoever for the following: a. Not manufacturing the

Kal Airways Private Limited Vs. Spicejet Limited and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

115. Both petitions are accordingly disposed of. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9, Section 17 - Companies Act, 2013 Section 42 (3), Section 42(6), Section 42(10) - Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 119, Section 201(1A), Sections 278B, … of the Company; b. pass an ad-interim ex-parte order directing the Respondents to deposit a sum of Rs. 835,00,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Hundred and Thirty Five Crores only)in the Court i.e. the value of the shares due to

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

2008, or an "officer who is in default", as defined in clause (60) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, or was in any manner incharge of, or responsible to the corporate debtor for the conduct of its … commencement date, the Adjudicating Authority shall by order declare moratorium for prohibiting all of the following, namely: - 83 (a) the institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor including execution

Arcelormittal India Private Limited Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

certain matters. According to the learned Senior Advocate, if the definition of “control” in Section 2(27) of the Companies Act, 2013 is applied, the relationship of KSS Global with KSS Petron would not constitute “control” over the wholly owned … took us to the original orders and argued that the document of the European Union, being Council Regulation 833 of 2014 dated 31.7.2014, pursuant to Article 215 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Donv and Limited vs.mykind Vacations Private Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

NATH, J.(Oral) This petition is filed under Section 433(e) read with Section 434 and 1. 439 of the Companies Act, 1956(hereinafter referred to as „the Company Act‟) for winding up of the respondent company.2. The brief facts of … entered into a FIT Sales Agreement on 25.11.2011. It is also pleaded that from December 2012 to September 2013, the respondent availed the services of the petitioner by making various bookings which were duly CO.PET. 218/2014 Page

Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka Vs. Tourism Finance Corporation Of India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

2009), or an “officer who is in default”, as defined in clause (60) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), or was in any manner incharge of, or responsible to the corporate debtor for the … had submitted for approval of the adjudicating authority. [SBI v. Bhushan Steel Ltd., 2018 SCC OnLine NCLT32305 para 83(i)]. Without relief from imposition of the such liability, the Committee noted that in the long run, potential resolution