Advanced Search Results
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Vs. Amit Gupta
Supreme Court of India
Mar-08-2021
Land Acquisition
Act, 1993, the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and the Companies Act, 2013. These statutes provide for creation of multiple fora such as Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), Debts … resolution professional are entirely different from the jurisdiction and powers of NCLT‖56. 72 Therefore, we hold that the RP can approach the NCLT for adjudication … Gupta & Ors. .... Respondents 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. They are: A The appeal B The genesis of the PPA C Initiation of CIRP
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShakti Yezdani Vs. Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar
Supreme Court of India
Dec-14-2023
Land Acquisition
Act as those are not pari materia with S. 109A & S. 109B (now S. 72 of the Companies Act, 2013) of the Companies Act, 1956. 15.2 It is contended that S. 109A & S. 109B (now S. 72 … 109A & S. 109B in the larger context of the Companies Act, 1956 or the pari materia provisions (Section 72, Companies Act, 2013) in support of their respective stand. Having perused the scheme behind the Companies Act, 1956
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPurnangini Trehan vs Union of India & Ors.
Delhi
Apr-17-2026
Land Acquisition
the shareholders and creditors in the Scheme of Compromise filed by the petitioner under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013.44. It is pertinent to note that no criminal investigation is pending against the petitioner, and the account has … 29, 31, 95, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53, 56, 59, 61, 71, 72, 85 and 89* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 17.04.2026IN THE MATTERS OF:7
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Prem Adip Rishi vs Union of India & Ors.
Delhi
Apr-17-2026
Land Acquisition
the shareholders and creditors in the Scheme of Compromise filed by the petitioner under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013.44. It is pertinent to note that no criminal investigation is pending against the petitioner, and the account has … 29, 31, 95, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53, 56, 59, 61, 71, 72, 85 and 89* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 17.04.2026IN THE MATTERS OF:7
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGautam Bhalla vs Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.
Delhi
Apr-17-2026
Land Acquisition
the shareholders and creditors in the Scheme of Compromise filed by the petitioner under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013.44. It is pertinent to note that no criminal investigation is pending against the petitioner, and the account has … 29, 31, 95, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53, 56, 59, 61, 71, 72, 85 and 89* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 17.04.2026IN THE MATTERS OF:7
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Kapur and Others Vs. Vikram Kapur and Others
Delhi
Aug-03-2015
Land Acquisition
a separate entity and is governed by the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (and presently by the Companies Act, 2013). The essential legal position that the shareholders of the Company are not the owners of its assets and … application was not being taken up, Mr. Rajiv Kapur filed OMP No. 72 of 2009 in which an order was passed by the learned Single … 1. The challenge in both these petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( ˜Act') is to an Award dated 1st November 2014
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKunwer Sachdev vs Union of India and Ors.
Delhi
Apr-17-2026
Land Acquisition
the shareholders and creditors in the Scheme of Compromise filed by the petitioner under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013.44. It is pertinent to note that no criminal investigation is pendingagainst the petitioner, and the account has neither … 27, 29, 31, 95, 32, 33, 34, 35,37, 38, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53, 56, 59, 61, 71, 72, 85 and 89* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 17.04.2026IN THE MATTERS OF:+
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSidhant Gupta vs Union of India & Ors.
Delhi
Apr-17-2026
Land Acquisition
the shareholders and creditors in the Scheme of Compromise filed by the petitioner under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013.44. It is pertinent to note that no criminal investigation is pendingagainst the petitioner, and the account has neither … 27, 29, 31, 95, 32, 33, 34, 35,37, 38, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53, 56, 59, 61, 71, 72, 85 and 89* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 17.04.2026IN THE MATTERS OF:+
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGaurav Bhalla vs Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.
Delhi
Apr-17-2026
Land Acquisition
the shareholders and creditors in the Scheme of Compromise filed by the petitioner under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013.44. It is pertinent to note that no criminal investigation is pendingagainst the petitioner, and the account has neither … 27, 29, 31, 95, 32, 33, 34, 35,37, 38, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53, 56, 59, 61, 71, 72, 85 and 89* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 17.04.2026IN THE MATTERS OF:+
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Nisschal Jaain vs Union of India & Ors.
Delhi
Apr-17-2026
Land Acquisition
the shareholders and creditors in the Scheme of Compromise filed by the petitioner under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013.44. It is pertinent to note that no criminal investigation is pendingagainst the petitioner, and the account has neither … 27, 29, 31, 95, 32, 33, 34, 35,37, 38, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53, 56, 59, 61, 71, 72, 85 and 89* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 17.04.2026IN THE MATTERS OF:+
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »