Advanced Search Results

Official Liquidator Of; M/s. B.S. Refrigerators Ltd. and Others Vs. M/ ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

of DHN Food Distributors Ltd., and Others -vs- London Borough of Tower Hamlets (1976(3) All Eng. Law Reports 462) wherein on taking note of the transaction interse and the shares held by the group companies has indicated … is filed under Rule 6 and 9 of the Company [Court] Rules, 1959, r/w Section 449 of the Companies Act, 1956, Praying to take into consideration the completion of sale in a transparent manner by public auction and

M/S Swastik Steels (Hospet) Pvt Ltd (in Liqn) vs Nil

Court : Karnataka

N Location: HIGH NIL COURT OF KARNATAKA …RESPONDENT THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 462 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 READ WITH RULES 11(b) AND 298 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1956. THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED … BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 174 OF 2025 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.78 OF 2013 BETWEEN: M/S. SWASTIK STEELS (HOSPET) PVT. LTD., (IN LIQN.) REPRESENTED BY OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CORPORATE

M/S Kmmi Ispat Pvt Ltd ( in Liqn) vs Nil

Court : Karnataka

N Location: HIGH NIL COURT OF KARNATAKA …RESPONDENT THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 462 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 READ WITH RULES 11(b) AND 298 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1956. THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED … THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 188 OF 2025 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 27 OF 2013 BETWEEN: M/S. KMMI ISPAT PVT. LTD., (IN LIQN.) REPRESENTED BY OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CORPORATE BHAVAN,

Yerram Vijay Kumar versus the State of Telangana & Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 439

Act, 2013; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Penal Code, 1860; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015.List of Keywords Section 447, Companies Act, 2013; Section 447, Companies Act, 2013; Section 451, Companies Act, 2013; Section 212(6), Companies Act, 2013; Section 436(2), Companies Act, … an offence under this Act, a Special Court may also try an offence other than an offence under 462 [2026] 1 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports this Act with which the accused may, under the Code of Criminal

M/s.Anantara Solutions Private Limited Vs Additional / Joint / Deputy ...

Court : Chennai

14,4595. Christian Wedell 30,7666. Walden Investment VI 51,931 Total 7,27,153RESOLVED FURTHER THAT pursuant to Section 53 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Sections 100 to 105 of the Companies Act, 1956, and other applicable provisions of the Companies Act,

Bhagyadas.M vs Aruvipuram S.N.D.P Yogam

Court : Kerala

14 of Table C; is the contention.15. The Senior Counsel further pointed out that Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013, corresponds to Section 25 of the 1956 Act & 1385/2021 29but a provision similar to Section 25(6) of … The only provision under which a company can be exempted from the provisions of the 2013 Act is Section 462, but the same can apply only as a general exemption. It is further pointed out as per Section

V.Vijayakumar, vs S.N.D.P Yogam,

Court : Kerala

14 of Table C; is the contention.15. The Senior Counsel further pointed out that Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013, corresponds to Section 25 of the 1956 Act & 1385/2021 29but a provision similar to Section 25(6) of … The only provision under which a company can be exempted from the provisions of the 2013 Act is Section 462, but the same can apply only as a general exemption. It is further pointed out as per Section

Converted as Suo-Motu Pil vs Union of India,

Court : Chennai

such person-(a) is an Indian national, or company as defined in 10[clause (20) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013)]; and(b) satisfies such conditions as may beprescribed: Provided that in respect of any mineral specified … about 0.10 MT.288. Using the same formula adopted for calculating the total amountof ROM necessary for producing 23, 462 MT of Monazite in the case of M/s.V.V. Mineral, it is found that a total quantity of 63,61,952

State of Haryana and Anr. Vs. Devander Sagar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Parliament has, in terms of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013, provided amelioration against Governmental apathy. 4 By a brief Order delivered on 12.1.2004, that is in the era … 8.4.2010 had released the subject land from acquisition. 2 The State of Haryana had issued a Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984 (‘L.A. Act’ for brevity) on 18.1.2001 to acquire 12.18 acres of

N. Mohan Reddy vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

NIMMALA R/O 4-2-522, POLICE HOUSING COLONY NEAR MAMTA MEDICAL COLLEGE KHANAPURAM HAWELI, KHAMMAM2. AGRICAPITA INNOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: ULTIMATE PLAZA II, 1ST FLOOR, SECTOR-A, PLOT NO. 24,Digitally signed by MANDAKINI COLONY, … (accused Nos.1 to 5) are before this Court challenging the registration of an FIR for offences punishable under Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal