Advanced Search Results

Vardhman Properties Ltd. Vs. Vardhman Realtech Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

in India, cannot be claimed exclusively by any person whatsoever. It is averred that as on 1st January, 2013, there are 319 companies registered all over India by the name of "Vardhman" with the Registrar of the … 5th April, 2010 and 16th August, 2010, respectively, which is in violation of Section 22 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 as the defendant no. 1 and 2/Companies have been registered with the name which closely resembles the … 763. 3. Hearest Communications Inc. v. Dinesh Varyana and Anr. CS(OS) No. 458 of 2008. Delhi High Court 2009. 15. On merit, it is her

Madhuri Commodities Private Ltd & Ors vs M/S Sony India Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

17 of 2067. At this stage, it is also relevant to note that under Section 149(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, a private Company is statutorily required to have a minimum of only two Directors on its Board of … reiterated by the Apex Court in SampellySatyanarayana Rao vs. Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited, (2016) 10 SCC 458, wherein it was observed by the Court that the question whether a post-dated cheque is for “discharge of

M/S Sapthagiri Shelters vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

NO.23 OF 2004 IS CONCERNED. IN WP NO. 10647/2021 BAGMANE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED -168- A COMPANY UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT LAKE VIEW A BLOCK, 8TH FLOOR, BAGMANE TECH PARK, C V RAMAN NAGAR … & R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH SECTION 18-A OF THE KARNATAKA TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT, 1961 BROUGHT INTO EFFECT BY KARNATAKA ACT NO.23 OF

Knk Construction Private Limited vs M/S Modern Asset

Court : Karnataka

Cas 458 (Tripura). Ananthasubramanian v. Union of India*, which pertains to a matter under section 339(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 which is pari materia with section 66 of the IBC. The High Court in the case of Smt.

M/S Hpcl Bio-Fuels Ltd. versus M/S Shahaji Bhanudas Bhad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.133

List of Acts Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Companies Act, 2013; Limitation Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. List of Keywords Section … 175; Union of India v. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. [2004] 2 SCR 642 : (2004) 3 SCC 458; Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd. v. Belapur Sugar & Allied Industries Ltd., 2004 (3) MHLF 414; Sarva Shramik

Sulochana Gupta, vs Rbg Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kerala

of the Articles of Association. W.A.1083/2020 53. Appellants have further stated that as per Section 96(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, the company should hold its Annual General Meeting(AGM) every year and not more than 15 months shall elapse … to the learned counsel, in terms of Raman Gopi and another v. Kunju Raman Uthaman [2011 (4) KLT 458 (FB)] and Ehvees v. The District Collector, Malappuram and Others (W.A. No. 706 of 2020 dated 08.06.2020 -

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. versus Century ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.313

Authority v. Harkishan [2017] 1 SCR 572 : (2017) 3 SCC 588 - referred to. List of Acts Companies Act, 2013; City of Bombay Improvement Act, 1898; Bombay Improvement Trust Transfer Act, 1925; Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. List … Basavaraj v. Canara Bank [2009] 15 SCR 504 : (2010) 12 SCC 458; Murlidhar Agarwal and Anr. v State of Uttar Pradesh and Others [1975] … sanitary dwellings for certain classes of the inhabitants of the city to secure tangible benefits for the poorer sections of society - Lease deed did not confer any rights to convert the usage of the lands for

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

2008, or an "officer who is in default", as defined in clause (60) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, or was in any manner incharge of, or responsible to the corporate debtor for the conduct of its

Yerram Vijay Kumar versus the State of Telangana & Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 439

Act, 2013; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Penal Code, 1860; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015.List of Keywords Section 447, Companies Act, 2013; Section 447, Companies Act, 2013; Section 451, Companies Act, 2013; Section 212(6), Companies Act, 2013; Section 436(2), Companies Act, … the trial Court on a private complaint, as it is a cognizable offence.1 2022 : TSHC : 30033. 458 [2026] 1 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports17. Under Section 206 of the Companies Act, 2013,the Registrar of Companies based

Mr. Siddharth Chugh vs Array Networks India Pvt Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

048 EMAIL:[email protected] ... PETITIONER (BY SRI PANKAJ BHAGATH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. ARRAY NETWORKS INDIA PVT. LTD.,A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT INDIQUBE SIGMA NO.3B 3RD BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU KARNATAKA, INDIA - 560 034. EMAIL: … ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MANU P.KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-1 AND R-2) THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 30/10/2024 PASSED BY THE