Advanced Search Results

Marine Geotechnics Llc Vs. Coastal Marine Construction and Engineering ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

an Indian company a debt due and payable by it within the meaning of Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956? This is the issue in this winding up petition. 2. The petitioner, Marine Geotechnics LLC (œMarine Geotechnics?) … Videocon Industries Ltd. (Company Petition No.528 of 2012; decision dated 5 December 2013, per N.M. Jamdar, J.) is a recent decision of a learned single … statutory notice. Coastal Marine must be deemed to be unable to pay its debts within the meaning of Section 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956. In any case, he says, Coastal Marine has liabilities in excess of Rs.26

Iae International Aero Engines Ag Vs. United Breweries(holdings) Limit ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

said Dr. Vijay Mallya who is said to be residing presently in the United Kingdom.9. Though the new Companies Act, 2013 has been enforced in India and some jurisdictions under that new Law have been transferred from this Court … and others Vs.United Breweries (Holdings) Limited 6/244 This Company Petition is filed under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) r/w Section 434 and 439(1)(b) of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, praying to pass an order to wind up the Respondent

Action Ispat & Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs.shyam Metalics & Energy Limi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

order dated 14.01.2019 held that the power to transfer a petition to NCLT under Section 434(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 is „discretionary‟ and „has to be exercised in the facts and circumstances of the case so as to

Saravana Alloys Steels Private Limited vs Magnifico Minerals Pvt Ltd

Court : Karnataka

1956, READ WITH SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, READ WITH SECTION 434(1) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.04.2024 PASSED BY THE LD. SINGLE JUDGE

The Archdiocese of Bangalore vs Nitesh Residency Hotels Private Limite ...

Court : Karnataka

THE COMPANY COURT RULES, 1959, READ WITH SECTION 151 OF THE CPC READ WITH SECTION 434(1) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 11 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016, PRAYING TO TRANSFER THE COMPANY PETITION

IAE International Aero Engines AG, Represented herein by its Attorney, ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

Dr. Vijay Mallya who is said to be residing presently in the United Kingdom. 9. Though the new Companies Act, 2013 has been enforced in India and some jurisdictions under that new Law have been transferred from this Court … the facts and circumstances of this case. This Company Petition is filed under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) r/w Section 434 and 439(1)(b) of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, praying to pass an order to wind up the Respondent

Cfsit, Inc vs.shakti Bhog Foods Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

plead that in terms of the powers vested in this court under proviso to section 434(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, it is mandatory for this court to transfer these petitions to NCLT.3. The Official Liquidator, some of the

Abhinandan Kumar Jain vs.mvl Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

plead that in terms of the powers vested in this court under proviso to section 434(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, it is mandatory for this court to transfer these petitions to NCLT.3. The Official Liquidator, some of the

Sicom Ltd. Vs.hanung Toys & Textiles Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

plead that in terms of the powers vested in this court under proviso to section 434(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, it is mandatory for this court to transfer these petitions to NCLT.3. The Official Liquidator, some of the

Brijesh Gupta & Anr. Vs.premia Projects Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

plead that in terms of the powers vested in this court under proviso to section 434(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, it is mandatory for this court to transfer these petitions to NCLT.3. The Official Liquidator, some of the