Advanced Search Results

Yerram Vijay Kumar versus the State of Telangana & Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 439

Act, 2013; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Penal Code, 1860; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015.List of Keywords Section 447, Companies Act, 2013; Section 447, Companies Act, 2013; Section 451, Companies Act, 2013; Section 212(6), Companies Act, 2013; Section 436(2), Companies Act, … extent of ss.448 and 451 quashed - Impugned judgment set aside - Penal Code, 1860 - ss.420, 406, 426, 468, 470, 471 & 120B - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s.482 - Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015.

Yogesh Agarwal Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

case are that the complainant Acko General Insurance Limited is a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. It is wholly owned by subsidiary of Acko Technology and Services Private Limited (Acko Tech). It is further … Police Station (CID), for the offences punishable under Sections 403, 406, 408, 426, 120B r/w.34 of IPC and Sections 66 and 72 of IT Act. … for R1 Sri C.V.Nagesh, Senior Counsel for Sri/Smt.Chinmayi J.Mirji, Advocate for R2) This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of of Cr.P.C praying to quash the entire proceedings in CR.No.7219/2020 presently on the file of the

Dheeraj Kansana Vs. State of M.P. and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

- Corporate criminal liability - Quashment of proceedings - Documents that may be relied on in defence - Companies Act, 1956, S. 291 10. Further picking up the same thread, the learned counsel for the petitioner relied on … learned counsel for the petitioner relied on Sathish Mehra Vs. State of N.C.T. Of Delhi and Anr. AIR 2013 SC 506, in which the powers of the High Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C has been clearly … of Haryana and others Vs. Bhajan Lal and others 1992 SCC (Cri) 426. 15. This Court vide order dated 25.8.2014 passed in W.P. No. 4998/2014

United Spirits Limited Vs. Neel Rajesh Shah

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

filed proceedings in CP No.06/2017 before the National Company Law Tribunal, Bangalore Bench under Section 58 of the Companies Act 2013, the Company Law Tribunal, Bangalore vide its order dated 18.03.2019 has allowed the said application filed by the … first category of cases enumerated in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal [1992 Supp (1) SCC335:1992. SCC (Cri) 426]. and as such warrants interference by the Court. Reading the averments in the Complaint in entirety and accepting

United Spirits Limited vs Neel Rajesh Shah

Court : Karnataka

having filedproceedings in CP No.06/2017 before the National Company Law Tribunal, Bangalore Bench under Section 58 of the Companies Act 2013, the Company Law Tribunal, Bangalore vide its order dated 18.03.2019 has allowed the said application filed by the … cases enumerated in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal [1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 426] and as such warrants interference by the Court. Reading the averments in the Complaint in entirety and accepting

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts Against Safety Of Maritime Navigation and Fixed Platforms On Continental Shelf Act, 2002; Section 212 of the Companies Act, 2013; and Section 12 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 2016. State Legislations:- Section 19 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and … judgment that the 612 Supra at Footnote No.303 613 Supra at Footnote No.302 614 Supra at Footnote No.302 426 impugned amendment is invalid just because it nullifies some provisions of the earlier Act.” (emphasis supplied) There are

Commissioner of Income-tax -II, Agra Vs. Dimpal Yadav

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

State or Provincial Act; (d) any Government company as defined in clause (45) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013); (e) such other institution, association or body or class of institutions, associations or bodies which … upon a decision of Gauhati High Court in CIT v. Bhagwati Prasad Bajoria (HUF)[2003] 263 ITR 487/133 Taxman 426, Chamundi Granites (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT/Asstt. Director of Inspection v. Kum. A.B. Shanthi [2002] 255 ITR 258/122

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

writ petition, it so happened that the Parliament has passed new company law in the form of Indian Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act, 2013') which replaces the earlier Act, 1956. In this Act, again substantive … behalf.” In the prayer clause, constitutional validity of Sections 415, 418, 424, 426, 431 and 434 have also been questioned. At the time of hearing, … defects in various provisions of Part 1B and Part 1C of the Act, 1956 and, in particular, in Sections 10FD(3)(f)(g)(h), 10FE, 10FF, 10FL(2), 10FR(3), 10FT. Declaring that those provisions as existed offended the basic Constitutional scheme of

Sulochana Gupta, vs Rbg Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kerala

of the Articles of Association. W.A.1083/2020 53. Appellants have further stated that as per Section 96(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, the company should hold its Annual General Meeting(AGM) every year and not more than 15 months shall elapse … 2020 Vs. Pinnacle(Air) Pvt. Ltd For Admission (After Notice)5. Comp. App (AT) NCC Ltd. Vs. Adhish Vijay(Ins) No. 426 of Golden Jubilee Srivastava Kaundal 2020 Hotels6. Comp. App (AT) Consolidated Kumar Anurag Vijay(Ins) No. 430 of Engineering

Ram Parshotam Mittal Vs. Hotel Queen Road pvt.ltd. Andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

shares of Rs.100 per share and a Special Business Resolution No.10 was passed under section 81(1A) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Companies Act’). The appointment of Mr. 4 R.P. Mittal, Mrs. Sarla Mittal … the Division Bench of Delhi High Court by a common order disposed of FAO (OS) No.282/2005, FAO (OS) 426 of 2008 and 440 of 2008 upholding the right of Hilcrest to vote in the meetings of HQRL.