Advanced Search Results

Moser Baer Karamchari Union Thr. President Mahesh Chand Sharma Vs. Uni ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Baer Karamchari Union have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction or order striking down Section 327(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2013”) as arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

V Nagarajan Vs. Sks Ispat And Power Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

is in the following terms: “61. Appeals and Appellate Authority.-(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained under the Companies Act, 2013, any person aggrieved by the order of the Adjudicating Authority under this part may prefer an appeal to … person aggrieved” in Section 61(2) of the IBC, in contradistinction to Section 421(3) of the Companies Act, has no material bearing since an appeal cannot … Ors. .... Respondents 1 PART A JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. A Facts ............................................................................................................ 2 B Submissions of Parties ................................................................................ 5 B.1 Appellant’s submissions ........................................................................ 5

The Deputy Commissioner And Vs. M/S S v Global Mill Limited

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Chowdhury, [(2018) 3 SCC41 (Bengal Chemists) is a case which arose under Sections 421(3) and 433 of the Companies Act, 2013 in the context of limitation period of forty-five (45) days prescribed in Section 421(3) plus additional forty-five (45)

M/S Vysya Leasing & Finance Ltd. Vs.m/s Amrit Lal Bajaj & Co. ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

other consequential legal effect. An indication of this position in law is given in Section 18(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, which provides that even in case of conversion of a company registered under one class to another class

Sagufa Ahmed Vs. Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

period of limitation from the date of the order of the NCLT, contrary to Section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, and (ii) that the Appellate Tribunal failed to take note of the lockdown as well as the order

Bengal Chemist and Druggists Association Vs. Kalyan Chowdhury

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Company Law Appellate Tribunal dated 31.07.2017 by which the Appellate Tribunal, after setting out Section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, (for short 'the Act') has dismissed the appeal as not maintainable, inasmuch as the appeal has been filed

A. Rajendra versus Gonugunta Madhusudhan Rao & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 4 S.C.R. 681

reads as follows:- 61. Appeals and Appellate Authority. - (1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained under the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) any person aggrieved by the order of the Adjudicating Authority under this part may prefer … period of limitation for filing appeal under Section 61(2) of the IBC, 2016. This Court while dealing with Section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Section 61(2) of IBC adopted a purposive interpretation and observed that the

Sunil Keswani vs.registrar of Companies Delhi & Haryana

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the order dated 04.07.2016 of the tribunal was subject to remedy of appeal before the appellate tribunal under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013. The petitioners place reliance on certain orders that were passed by the appellate … versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC1 ORDER (ORAL) Section 74 of the Companies Act, 2013, prior to its amendment of 2018, read as under:-"“74. Repayment of deposits, etc., accepted before commencement of this

Unitech Ltd. Vs.registrar of Companies Delhi & Haryana

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the order dated 04.07.2016 of the tribunal was subject to remedy of appeal before the appellate tribunal under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013. The petitioners place reliance on certain orders that were passed by the appellate … versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC1 ORDER (ORAL) Section 74 of the Companies Act, 2013, prior to its amendment of 2018, read as under:-"“74. Repayment of deposits, etc., accepted before commencement of this

Rajeev Vidyadharan @ Rajeev Anchal vs the National Company Law Tribuna ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

The writ petition is not maintainable in view of theefficacious remedy of appeal available to the petitioners under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013. As against Ext.P11, the petitioners have already preferred an appeal before the NCLT. … the 1st Respondent violating Exhibit P-9 order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and violating the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 during the pendency of Company Appeal (AT)5. To issue a writ of Mandamus to the R-25 directing him