Advanced Search Results
Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Supreme Court of India
May-14-2015
Company
writ petition, it so happened that the Parliament has passed new company law in the form of Indian Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act, 2013') which replaces the earlier Act, 1956. In this Act, again substantive … in Section 409 of the Act, 2013 and that of Chairperson and Members of NCLAT are stipulated in Section 411 of the Act, 2013. The petitioner has no quarrel about the qualifications mentioned for the President and Judicial
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jul-14-2021
Land Acquisition
Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002;Section 268, Companies Act, 2013; Section 231 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Section 56, Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006; … and (e) of Section 409(3) relating to the appointment of Technical Members were held to be invalid. Section 411(3), which provided qualifications of Technical Members, and Section 412(2), which dealt with the constitution of the Selection Committee,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMsk Worldwide Express Private Limited vs Msk Courier & Cargo Priva ...
Karnataka
Nov-13-2025
IA NO.3 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1&2 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC. IN MFA NO.4173/2019 CIN:U63023KA2014PTC073755 PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, NO.72, (OLD NO.797), “ANNAPOORNA” REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. M. SATISH KUMAR S/O LATE MR. MARIYAPPA AGED
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S Columbia Sportswear India Sourcing Pvt Ltd vs Union of India
Karnataka
Apr-26-2025
taken an identical view in Xilinx India’s case supra, as under:-2. The petitioner is a company incorporated underthe Companies Act, 2013. It has its registered office in Hyderabad, Telangana and branch office in New Delhi. The petitioner is a … the nature ofservice tax was explained and it was observed that (page 411 in 293 ITR) : "6. At this stage, we may refer to … FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 174 OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT 2017 ANNEXURE-A AS ULTRA VIRES THE CONSTITUTIONAL 101ST AMENDMENT ACT,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Kims Bellerose Institue of Medical Sciences Pvt Ltd vs State of K ...
Kerala
Jun-04-2024
the petitioner company in the revenue records to match Ext.P2 certificate.2. Petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956and the erstwhile name of the Company was Bellerose Institute of Medical Sciences Pvt. Ltd. and was represented … and the petitioner company was not duly stamped whereby violating Sections 39 and 42 of the Companies Act, 2013.3. The petitioner would submit that M/s.Bellerose Institute of MedicalSciences Pvt. Ltd. was run by the erstwhile owner, Juby … erstwhile owner and the petitioner company was not duly stamped whereby violating Sections 39 and 42 of the Companies Act, 2013.3. The petitioner would submit … of 2019 is pending before the Apex Court and that FIR No. 411 of 2019 of Crime Branch Kottayam and ECIR registered by theEnforcement Directorate
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jul-27-2022
Land Acquisition
Acts Against Safety Of Maritime Navigation and Fixed Platforms On Continental Shelf Act, 2002; Section 212 of the Companies Act, 2013; and Section 12 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 2016. State Legislations:- Section 19 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and … in Behram Khurshid 583 Supra at Footnote No.159 584 Supra at Footnote No.3 585 Supra at Footnote No.159 411 Pesikaka586 and Deep Chand587 including American jurisprudence expounded in Cooley on Constitutional Limitations588 and Norton vs. Shelby County589.117.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Represented By Vs. S P Raju
Karnataka
Sep-23-2022
Land Acquisition
reasonable connection with the discharge of his duties. (ii) Anil Kumar and others Vs. M.K.Aiyappa and another - 2013 (1) SCC705In this judgment it is held that in the absence of sanction, Magistrate cannot even order investigation … unknown public servants & others for the offences under Sections 120B, 379, 411, 420, 427, 444, 468, 447 of IPC, Sec. 13(1)(d) r/w Sec. 13(2) … Sections 120B, 379, 420, 427 & 447 of IPC and under Section 13(2) r/w Sec. 13(1)(d) of P.C. Act, 1988 and consequently reject the said I.A.No.14. IN CRL.RP.NO.1476/2016: BETWEEN State Represented by Central Bureau of Investigation (Anti-Corruption
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Represented By Vs. Ramakant Y Hullar
Karnataka
Sep-23-2022
Land Acquisition
reasonable connection with the discharge of his duties. (ii) Anil Kumar and others Vs. M.K.Aiyappa and another - 2013 (1) SCC705In this judgment it is held that in the absence of sanction, Magistrate cannot even order investigation … unknown public servants & others for the offences under Sections 120B, 379, 411, 420, 427, 444, 468, 447 of IPC, Sec. 13(1)(d) r/w Sec. 13(2) … Sections 120B, 379, 420, 427 & 447 of IPC and under Section 13(2) r/w Sec. 13(1)(d) of P.C. Act, 1988 and consequently reject the said I.A.No.14. IN CRL.RP.NO.1476/2016: BETWEEN State Represented by Central Bureau of Investigation (Anti-Corruption
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Represented By Vs. Smt Shameem Bhanu
Karnataka
Sep-23-2022
Land Acquisition
reasonable connection with the discharge of his duties. (ii) Anil Kumar and others Vs. M.K.Aiyappa and another - 2013 (1) SCC705In this judgment it is held that in the absence of sanction, Magistrate cannot even order investigation … unknown public servants & others for the offences under Sections 120B, 379, 411, 420, 427, 444, 468, 447 of IPC, Sec. 13(1)(d) r/w Sec. 13(2) … Sections 120B, 379, 420, 427 & 447 of IPC and under Section 13(2) r/w Sec. 13(1)(d) of P.C. Act, 1988 and consequently reject the said I.A.No.14. IN CRL.RP.NO.1476/2016: BETWEEN State Represented by Central Bureau of Investigation (Anti-Corruption
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Represented By Vs. N Vishwanathan
Karnataka
Sep-23-2022
Land Acquisition
reasonable connection with the discharge of his duties. (ii) Anil Kumar and others Vs. M.K.Aiyappa and another - 2013 (1) SCC705In this judgment it is held that in the absence of sanction, Magistrate cannot even order investigation … unknown public servants & others for the offences under Sections 120B, 379, 411, 420, 427, 444, 468, 447 of IPC, Sec. 13(1)(d) r/w Sec. 13(2) … Sections 120B, 379, 420, 427 & 447 of IPC and under Section 13(2) r/w Sec. 13(1)(d) of P.C. Act, 1988 and consequently reject the said I.A.No.14. IN CRL.RP.NO.1476/2016: BETWEEN State Represented by Central Bureau of Investigation (Anti-Corruption
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »