Advanced Search Results

Sunil Kumar Jain Vs. Sundaresh Bhatt

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Code as the term having the same meaning as assigned to it in Section 326 of the Companies Act, 2013. It is submitted that Section 327 of the Companies Act provides for preferential payments upon winding up of

IAE International Aero Engines AG, Represented herein by its Attorney, ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

Dr. Vijay Mallya who is said to be residing presently in the United Kingdom. 9. Though the new Companies Act, 2013 has been enforced in India and some jurisdictions under that new Law have been transferred from this Court … (Prayers: This Company Petition is filed under Section 439(1)(b) r/w Sections 433(e), 433(f), 434 and 450 of the Companies Act, 1956, praying to order that the … Investment Corp. v. North India Petrochemicals Ltd., reported in 1994 (3) SCC 348, the petition for winding up ought to be dismissed. 73. Without prejudice

The Oriental Insurance Co. Limited and Another Vs. Gulab Road Lines an ...

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

to comply with the same (order dated 29.07.1999). 6. On 10.05.2013, the instant Execution Application bearing No.11 of 2013, under Section 27 of the Act, was filed by Decree Holders/Complainants to punish the Judgment Debtors/Opposite Parties, in … This Criminal Petition/Execution Application has been filed by the complainants/Decree Holders, under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act only) for enforcement of the order dated 29.07.1999, passed by

Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

debtor, such as undischarged insolvents and persons who have been removed as directors under Section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013 (for not filing financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of 3 financial years, for example). … be unwise, improvident, or out of harmony with a particular school of thought‖ [Williamson v. Lee Optical Co., 348 U.S. 483, 488 27 (1955)].. Nor are we able or willing to draw lines by calling a law

M/s. Sun TV Network Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director K. Vija ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

same meaning as assigned to them under section4 of the companies Act, 1956 and Section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013. Note 5: The terms Onter-Connected Undertakings shall have the same meaning as assigned to it as per the … entertainment channel in South India having invested an amount of Rs.150.22 crores and is also offering employment to 348 direct persons in the said channels and is in operation from 2006. The petitioner further stated that it

Hari Sankaran Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Tribunal allowed the said 2 application preferred by the Central Government under Section 130(1) & (2) of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Companies Act’) and has permitted re­casting and re­ opening of the accounts of … is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. That the said company IL&FS has 348 group companies, including IFIN and ITNL. That the said IL&FS is a core investment company and systemically important

Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited (Formerly Known as Dewan H ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]4S.C.R.344

Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016; Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2019; Companies Act, 2013; Companies Act, 1956; Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016; Financial … of the RBI Act or of the NHB Act. [Paras 95, 99] 348 [2025] 4 S.C.R. Digital Supreme Court Reports Reserve Bank of India Act, … Pagination as per the original Judgment. 352 [2025] 4 S.C.R. Digital Supreme Court Reports (iii) Mandatory Requirements of Section 30(2) of the IBC and Regulation 38 of Regulations, 2016 ........................................................................ 95 (iv) Maximization of the value of

Achal Kumar Jindal vs State Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

have been stated.15. Sh. Jethmalani submits that the complainants had, earlier, filed aCompany Petition under Sections 241/242/244 of Companies Act, 2013, alleging oppression-and-mismanagement in ECL and therein also, similar averments had been made. In such petition, filed way back … Anilchandra Shah vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another: (2013) 6 SCC 348, it is argued that after filing charge-sheet on the basis of first … Petitioner Achal Kumar Jindal, who seeks quashing of FIRNo.0142/2025 registered at P.S. EOW for commission of offences under Sections 420/409/120B IPC, has filed the abovesaid two applications in CRL.M.C. 321/2026 whereby he seeks stay of on-going investigation

D. Anil Kumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

attracted. According to him, M/s PRD Mini Nidhi Limited is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 as a 'Nidhi' in terms of Section 406 of the Act as it stood then at the time

D. Anil Kumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

attracted. According to him, M/s PRD Mini Nidhi Limited is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 as a 'Nidhi' in terms of Section 406 of the Act as it stood then at the time