Advanced Search Results

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

2008, or an "officer who is in default", as defined in clause (60) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, or was in any manner incharge of, or responsible to the corporate debtor for the conduct of its

Electrosteel Steel Limited (Now M/S Esl Steel Limited) versus Ispat Ca ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1373

Enterprises Development Act, 2006; Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Civil Procedure Code, 1908; Companies Act, 2013.List of Keywords Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Section 31 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; … a total principal outstanding amount of Rs. 1,59,09,214.00 which were registered as Case No. 330/2014 and Case No. 331/2014. In Case No. 330/2014, the claim amount was Rs. 1,36,69,981.33, whereas in Case No. 331/2014 the claim amount

Ashok Kumar & Sons (Huf) vs.brahma City Private Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

9 9. The above submissions have been considered. Pursuant to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, („IBC‟), the Companies Act, 2013 was amended in the manner specified in the 11th Schedule to the IBC. Section 434 of the Companies

Roseland Buildtech Pvt Ltd vs Vihaan 43 Reality Pvt Ltd Earlier Known ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 1993, the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and the Companies Act, 2013. These statutes provide for creation of multiple fora such as Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), Debt … 13 V. OBJECT AND PURPOSE OF THE IBC............................................ 14 VI. OUSTER PROVISIONS UNDER THE IBC .................................... 19 VII. SECTIONS 65, 75, 60(5)(C) OF THE IBC AND THE RELEVANT NCLT RULES, 2016 ................................................................................... 20 A. SCOPE OF SECTION … made in the plaint are considered on(2025) 4 SCC 38.(2023) 16 SCC 331.(2023) 8 SCC 274.(2022) 2 SCC 583.(2018) 1 SCC 407.(2025) 256 Comp Cas

M/S Hpcl Bio-Fuels Ltd. versus M/S Shahaji Bhanudas Bhad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.133

List of Acts Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Companies Act, 2013; Limitation Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. List of Keywords Section … : (2019) 8 SCC 416; Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India [2019] 17 SCR 331 : (2020) 17 SCC 324; Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Assn. v. NBCC (India) Ltd. [2021] 12 SCR

Chetan Malhotra and Others Vs. Lala Ram and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kaushalya Devi v. Karan Arora, 2007 11 SCC 120 is yet another case relied upon by the insurance companies. It arose out of death of a minor (fourteen years' old boy), the claim having been preferred under … finding on contributory negligence. Case 'C' : MAC Appeal No. 250 of 2013 (In re: death of eleven years' old child Mukesh) 7. This appeal … 100), the index was 172 in 1989-90 and 331 in the financial year 1997-98. If we go … 18 on the notional income of Rs. 15,000/- p.a. as specified in the second schedule to the M.V. Act, adding the non-pecuniary damages in terms of R.K. Malik (supra). The parents (claimants) are in appeal seeking enhancement. … in the MV Act, including on the principle of fault liability (under Section 166). The decision to make an appropriate award of compensation in each

Anil Khirwal Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines and ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

(8) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, the period of mining leases, including existing mining leases, of Government companies or corporations shall be such as may be prescribed by the Central Government. (9) The provisions of this … of the State Government after coming into force of the Mines and Minerals 2 (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 2015 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘Amendment Act, 2015’) and the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in … fallen from 218 million tonnes in 2009-10 to 152 million tonnes in 2013-14. Section 8A was inserted as the State Government had no facility or

Ms Shah Brothers Through One of Its Partner Sri Raj Kumar Shah Vs. The ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

(8) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, the period of mining leases, including existing mining leases, of Government companies or corporations shall be such as may be prescribed by the Central Government. (9) The provisions of this … of the State Government after coming into force of the Mines and Minerals 2 (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 2015 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘Amendment Act, 2015’) and the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in … fallen from 218 million tonnes in 2009-10 to 152 million tonnes in 2013-14. Section 8A was inserted as the State Government had no facility or

Padam Kumar Jain Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

(8) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, the period of mining leases, including existing mining leases, of Government companies or corporations shall be such as may be prescribed by the Central Government. (9) The provisions of this … of the State Government after coming into force of the Mines and Minerals 2 (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 2015 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘Amendment Act, 2015’) and the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in … fallen from 218 million tonnes in 2009-10 to 152 million tonnes in 2013-14. Section 8A was inserted as the State Government had no facility or

Lawson Vs. Fmr Llc

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

for the first circuit No. 12-3. Argued November 12, 2013-Decided March 4, 2014 To safeguard investors in public companies and restore trust in the financial markets following the collapse of Enron Corporation, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act … detailed provisions of the text.” Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 331 U. S. 519 . Pp. 14-16.      (b) Other considerations support the … Rep. No. 107-146, pp. 2-11 (2002). A provision of the Act, 18 U. S. C. §1514A, protects whistleblowers. Section 1514A, at the time here relevant, instructed: “No [public] company . . . , or any officer, employee,