Advanced Search Results

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

2008, or an "officer who is in default", as defined in clause (60) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, or was in any manner incharge of, or responsible to the corporate debtor for the conduct of its … PETITION (C) No.228/2020 WRIT PETITION(C) No.209/2020 JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.1. The petitioners have approached this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. They call in 2 question Sections 3, 4 and 10 of the Insolvency

Securities And Exchange Board Of India Vs. Rajkumar Nagpal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

October 2020, a joint of meeting of a class of creditors was governed by section 230 of the Companies Act 2013.13 The SEBI Circular adopted a special majority of 60% of the investors by ISIN and 75% of the … dated 6 July 2019 and the legal framework thereafter ........... 27 iii. SEBI (Debenture Trustees) Regulations 1993 ..................................................... 32 iv. The SEBI Circular dated 13 October 2020 and the legal framework thereafter 34 a. The SEBI Circular:

Arcelormittal India Private Limited Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

certain matters. According to the learned Senior Advocate, if the definition of “control” in Section 2(27) of the Companies Act, 2013 is applied, the relationship of KSS Global with KSS Petron would not constitute “control” over the wholly owned … which in turn is owned and controlled by the L.N. Mittal Group, the promoters of AMIPL. Fraseli held 32.22% in one ‘KazStroy Service Global BV’ (hereinafter referred to as “KSS Global”), a company incorporated in the Netherlands

National Confederation Of Officers Association Of Central Public Secto ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Union Government ensures that no decision which requires the passage of a special resolution under the Companies Act 2013 can be adopted without its support, which effectively gives it a veto over key decisions concerning HZL. The … veto over key decisions concerning HZL. The control of the Union Government is wielded under the provisions of Section 134(2) and Section 47 of the Companies Act 2013. Under the Companies Act 2013, several matters requiring the … of Officers Association1 has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution. The Confederation, which is a trade union registered under

Shri. Avinash Katware vs the State of Karnataka by

Court : Karnataka

on the - 77 - Company stating that no payments are to be made to non- banking finance Companies, unsecured creditors, unsecured loans and on account of capital goods, the concurrent Auditor was authorized to monitor the … of Directors dated 14.04.2008. It is further stated that during 2005 to 2013, the Company undertook major expansion in Himachal Pradesh and business of the … any point of time and hence, the allegations made against him are baseless.62. Learned senior advocate contended that Section 32 of SARFAESI Act gives protection to the officials of the Bank who act in good faith under the

Delhi & District Cricket Association vs.vinod Tihara & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Plaintiff is of oppression and mismanagement and in terms of Section 241 read with 430 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Trial Court had no jurisdiction to entertain this dispute and the same ought to have been filed … taken cognizance of the said complaint and should have initiated an inquiry on the said complaint. FAO4132018 Page 32 of 58 43. It was also submitted on behalf of the Respondent no.1 that the contentions raised by

Association For Democratics Reforms Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

the IT Act was amended in 1978 to exempt the income of political parties through voluntary 174 The Companies Act 2013; Section 2(40) 175 The Companies At 2013; Section 137 121 PART F contributions for tax purposes (ostensibly to curb … former serves a larger public interest. In Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan v. Union of India162, proceedings under Article 32 were initiated challenging orders issued under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure prohibiting protests in certain

M/S. Svpcllimited,d. No.11-13-173/11and12 Vs. The State Bank ofindia a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

of movable property. Section 2 (v) defines "reconstruction company" to mean a company formed and registered under the Companies Act, 1956 for the purpose of asset reconstruction. Section 2(z) defines "securitisation" to mean acquisition of financial assets by … by the petitioner, as devoid of merits. A petition, in Crl.M.P.No.2559 of 2013, was filed by the 1st respondent bank, under Section 14 of the … evolve a scheme for reconstruction. Section 22, which is given primacy by way of a non-obstante clause in Section 32 of SICA, has been enacted to protect the properties of the sick industrial company and the company itself

Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

debtor, such as undischarged insolvents and persons who have been removed as directors under Section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013 (for not filing financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of 3 financial years, for example). … done by giving notice to the corporate debtor who then has an opportunity to correct such information. 69 32. Apart from the record maintained by such utility, Form I appended to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to

Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka Vs. Tourism Finance Corporation Of India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

2009), or an “officer who is in default”, as defined in clause (60) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), or was in any manner incharge of, or responsible to the corporate debtor for the … “326. We are of the clear view that no case whatsoever is made out to seek invalidation of Section 32-A. The boundaries of this Court's jurisdiction are clear. The wisdom of the legislation is not open to judicial