Advanced Search Results

Ashapura Minechem Ltd. Vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of revival and rehabilitation, sanction of scheme, scheme to be binding and for the implementation of scheme under section 261 to 264 of the Companies Act, 2013; And, whereas, sections 253 to 269 of the Companies Act, 2013 … sanctioned or are under implementation; And, whereas the Companies Act, 1956 has been repealed are re-enacted as the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) which, inter alia, provides for scheme of revival and rehabilitation, sanction of scheme, scheme to

M/S Atv Projects (India) Ltd vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of revival and rehabilitation, sanction of scheme, scheme to be binding and for the implementation of scheme under section 261 to 264 of the Companies Act, 2013; And, whereas, sections 253 to 269 of the Companies Act, 2013 … sanctioned or are under implementation; And, whereas the Companies Act, 1956 has been repealed are re-enacted as the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) which, inter alia, provides for scheme of revival and rehabilitation, sanction of scheme, scheme to

Tata Consultancy Services Limited Vs. Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Companies Act, 1956 had not been repealed. The provisions for repeal are contained in Section 465 of The Companies Act, 2013. Section 465(1) repeals the 1956 Act, subject to certain stipulations mentioned in the provisos there under. Sub­section (2) of … This meant that with effect from 13.12.2000, the whole of Section 43A except Sub­section (2A) got washed out. 26120.18 Sub­section (2A) prescribes the procedure to be followed by a company, which has earlier become a public company

Sulochana Gupta, vs Rbg Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kerala

of the Articles of Association. W.A.1083/2020 53. Appellants have further stated that as per Section 96(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, the company should hold its Annual General Meeting(AGM) every year and not more than 15 months shall elapse … Constitution Bench in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India [1997] 228 ITR 725 (SC); [1997] 3 SCC 261, dealt with the nature of power of judicial review conferred by article 226 of the W.A.1083/2020 82Constitution and

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts Against Safety Of Maritime Navigation and Fixed Platforms On Continental Shelf Act, 2002; Section 212 of the Companies Act, 2013; and Section 12 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 2016. State Legislations:- Section 19 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and

Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

debtor, such as undischarged insolvents and persons who have been removed as directors under Section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013 (for not filing financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of 3 financial years, for example). … contracts, Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U. S. 1 (1915), setting minimum wages for women, Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, 261 U. S. 525 (1923), and fixing 2 New State Ice Co. v. Liebman, 285 U.S. 262, 310-311 (1932).

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

a creditor of DPCL has no right to challenge the decision of DPCL under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 much less by way of writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. For the said purpose, the … has been empowered to make laws under Clause (3)(a) of Article 239AA. 261. The further contention is that since the Lt. Governor is bound by … language of Section 44 of the Act, the difference between the position of the President and the Governor on the one

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

individuals, firm, cooperative or other society, association, trust, agency, or 233 As defined in Section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013. 234 Section 2(b)(i), Transgender Persons Act 192 PART D institution.235 ‘Establishment’ therefore includes any public or private entity, … marriage on its irretrievable breakdown dispensing of the six month cooling period prescribed by law in certain circumstances. 261 D Paul Sullins, Child Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in same-sex parent families in the United States: Prevalence and

M/s. Maya Appliances Private Limited, Besant Avenue, Adyar, Chennai an ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : MRTP

and discriminating does not rule out the element of confusion if the trade marks/trade names/corporate names of two companies are identical or if the similarity between them is profound. In several cases it has been held that … kitchen appliances. The first applicant launched its brand VIDIEM in the year 2013, under which gas cook-tops, table top grinders and pressure cookers were sold. … between the marks is great (Wincharger Corpn. Vs. Rinco, Inc., 297 F2d 261 (CCPA 1962). "The words 'sophisticated' and 'knowledgeable' are not talismans which, when … provisions and the principles of law. Apropos the provisions, they are placed hereunder for easy understanding: THE DESIGNS ACT, 2000: 3.1. Section 2(d): design means only the features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornament or composition of lines

Sageer Rashid K.a vs Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

Investor Education and Protection Fund ( ‘IEPF’, in short) as per Section 124 (5) & (6) of the Companies Act, 2013, as they remained unclaimed in the unpaid dividend account of the respective companies for a period of seven … POPULAR CANDLE INDUSTRIES EDAPALLY, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 68202419 MURALI MANOHAR G G AGED 54 YEARS S/O GOKULAN, GOKULALAYAM, 261/111 KUMBALAM, PANANGAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682506 20 SONY JOY AGED 48 YEARS S/O JOY MENACHERY, MENACHERY HOUSE, NEAR